VTI holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

VTI's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 6.36% of net assets. Apple Inc and Microsoft Corp follow; the three together are 16.06%. Ten companies are 32.02% of the fund; the other 3,529 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, VTI behaves like 67 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.6 times the median. Across 28 quarterly filings VTI has become more concentrated: it behaved like 161.5 at 2019-09-30 and 67 at 2026-06-30. Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 127 positions were added and 109 dropped; 9.0% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, VTI went from behaving like 161.5 equally weighted positions to 67 — 59% fewer, while its top ten went from 17.79% to 32.02% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

The 15 largest of 3,539 positions in VTI's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: listed with the point-in-time files, available on request.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of VTI's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.04 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: VTI.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $10.2bn was out to 35 borrowers, 0.44% of net assets. The largest, BofA Securities, Inc., held 14.6% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.43% of net assets, 97.3% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter VTI has filed, with each borrower: VTI.json · all funds.

3,467 positions became 3,485: 127 added (0.5% of the fund at the later date), 109 dropped (0.5% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 9.0%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of VTI compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Space Exploration Technologies Corp (0.14%), Honeywell International Inc (0.10%), Honeywell Aerospace Inc (0.10%), Carnival Corp Ltd (0.05%), DuPont de Nemours Inc (0.03%), Fedex Freight Holding Co Inc (0.02%). Gone: Honeywell International Inc (0.23%), Carnival Corp (0.05%), Coterra Energy Inc (0.04%), DuPont de Nemours Inc (0.03%), Hologic Inc (0.03%), Masimo Corp (0.01%).

99.30% equity, 0.70% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $2.30T. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OBFR01 + 0% on $4.24B of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of VTI (67). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• 033 Expense ratio
• 026 Maximum drawdown
• 023 Standard deviation
• 023 Factor exposure
• 016 Total return
• 016 Beta
• 012 Duration
• 011 Turnover

The same filings read aloud in under a minute. Links open YouTube; nothing from it loads on this page.

• VTI vs XLK: owning both is less diversified than VTI alone (33% overlap) 2026-10-06
• VTI vs VUG: owning both is less diversified than VTI alone (52% overlap) 2026-09-28
• QQQ vs VTI: owning both is less diversified than VTI alone (48% overlap) 2026-09-27
• IVV + VTI: owning both makes you less diversified 2026-09-10
• VOO + VTI: owning both makes you less diversified 2026-09-04

• QQQ Holdings: All 105 Positions, the Top 10 at 45%, and Why It Behaves Like 34 Stocks

  What the Invesco QQQ Trust actually held on 30 June 2026, from its SEC Form N-PORT filing: 102 stocks plus three cash and futures lines, the fifty largest with weights, and the arithmetic that turns "105 holdings" into an effective count of 34. Nvidia 7.6%, Apple 6.7%, Micron 5.6%; the top ten are 45.0% and the top fifty 87.5%. Overlap with VOO, VGT, XLK and QQQM, and how the concentration has moved since 2020.

  17 Sept 2026 5 min ETF Analysis

• How Long Will Your Money Last? The 4% Rule Tested on 25 Years of Real Fund Returns

  A retirement withdrawal test that uses the actual monthly returns of VTI, QQQ, IWM, AGG and TLT since 1999-2003 — including 2000-02 and 2008 — instead of an assumed return distribution. Eight portfolios, four withdrawal rates, 2,000 resampled 30-year paths each. The 4% rule survives almost everywhere in nominal terms; the interesting numbers are at 5%, 6% and 7%, and in what a bad decade does to a bond-only or Nasdaq-only retiree.

  16 Sept 2026 5 min Investment Framework

• Monte Carlo vs the 4% Rule: Simulating Retirement Withdrawals Instead of Assuming Them

  The 4% rule is a single conclusion drawn from one country's worst historical sequence; Monte Carlo is a method that asks how often a plan survives across...

  31 Aug 2026 9 min Long-Term Strategy

• Direct Indexing vs ETFs: When Owning the Stocks Beats Owning the Fund for Tax-Loss Harvesting

  An ETF is a single tax lot from the holder's perspective: you can only harvest a loss when the whole fund is underwater. Direct indexing holds the...

  30 Aug 2026 9 min Long-Term Strategy

• How Concentrated Is Your Index, Really? Measuring the Effective Number of Holdings

  A fund's holding count is a headline number; the effective number of holdings — the count an equal-weighted portfolio would need to match the same...

  28 Aug 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• Minimum Variance vs Maximum Diversification: Two Optimizers, Two Very Different Portfolios

  Minimum variance and maximum diversification start from the same covariance matrix but optimize different things — one minimizes portfolio volatility, the...

  22 Aug 2026 9 min Long-Term Strategy

• VO vs IJH: The Overlooked Mid-Cap Allocation — Does It Add Anything to VOO?

  VO and IJH both call themselves "mid-cap," but they track different indices with different rules — the S&P MidCap 400 (IJH) applies an earnings screen and...

  05 Aug 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• Target-Date Funds vs a DIY Three-Fund Portfolio: What the Convenience Actually Costs

  The headline fee gap between a Vanguard target-date fund and a self-built three-fund portfolio is roughly 0.04% a year — real, but far smaller than most...

  04 Aug 2026 10 min Long-Term Strategy

• ARKK vs QQQ: Disruptive Innovation vs the Nasdaq-100 — What a Full Cycle Revealed

  Over the trailing five years QQQ compounded at 15.6% annually while ARKK compounded at −8.1% — the two funds did not just diverge in degree, they diverged...

  03 Aug 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• The Hidden Chip Bet in Your Index Fund: How Much Semiconductor Exposure QQQ, VOO, and VTI Really Carry

  Cap-weighting quietly routes the same handful of mega-cap AI and semiconductor names into QQQ, VOO, and VTI — so "broad" and "concentrated" have become a...

  23 Jul 2026 10 min Long-Term Strategy

• VTV vs VUG: The Value-vs-Growth Split Inside the S&P 500 — What 15 Years of Data Show

  Over the trailing decade VUG compounded faster (18.1% vs 12.6% 10Y CAGR), but it did so with roughly double the realized volatility and a drawdown more than...

  16 Jul 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• RSP vs VOO: Does Equal-Weighting the S&P 500 Actually Beat Cap-Weighting?

  Over the trailing five and ten years, cap-weighted VOO beat equal-weighted RSP on total return — and it did so at a lower fee (0.03% vs 0.20%)....

  15 Jul 2026 8 min ETF Analysis

• VT vs VTI: Total World vs Total US — What Global Diversification Actually Adds

  VT is not "international" — it is roughly 60% US already, so the real choice is 100% US versus a 60/40 US/ex-US blend in one ticker. Over the trailing...

  23 Jun 2026 8 min ETF Analysis

• The Three-Fund Portfolio in 2026: What VTI, VXUS, and BND Actually Delivered

  Over the trailing five years, VTI did the heavy lifting (12.3% CAGR), VXUS lagged (7.9%), and BND delivered almost nothing (0.1%) — yet that spread is the...

  20 Jun 2026 8 min Long-Term Strategy

• Why 'VOO vs VTI' Is Usually the Wrong Question: A Framework for Measuring ETF Overlap

  VOO and VTI share the same large-cap core, the same 0.03% fee, and a return history that has tracked within roughly a percentage point a year — so "which is...

  13 Jun 2026 8 min Investment Framework

• VOO vs VTI: S&P 500 vs Total US Market — What the Difference Actually Costs Over Decades

  VOO and VTI carry the identical 0.03% expense ratio, so this decision is not about cost — it is about factor exposure. The only real difference is VTI's...

  08 Jun 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• IGV vs WCLD vs QQQ: Breaking Down the 'Tech Beta' Stack

  IGV, WCLD, and QQQ are sold as "tech ETFs" but they are not interchangeable. QQQ is a diversified large-cap growth index, IGV is a concentrated software...

  03 Jun 2026 13 min ETF Analysis

• FCTR vs LRGF: Where AI Actually Changes the Multi-Factor Loading

  LRGF has returned 13.5% annualized over the past five years; FCTR has returned 3.0%. A 10.5-percentage-point gap that wide is structural, not noise. FCTR's...

  27 May 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• QRFT Explained: AI-Driven Multi-Factor — Holdings, Fees, and Live Track Record

  Over the past five years, the rules-based iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF (LRGF) returned 13.5% annualized; the AI-enhanced QRAFT U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT)...

  25 May 2026 11 min ETF Analysis

• TTAI Explained: Tactical Theme Rotation — Is the AI Signal Actually Repeatable?

  TTAI is not an "AI rotation" fund in any meaningful sense — it is a rules-based free-cash-flow screen on international developed-market large caps, charging...

  23 May 2026 11 min ETF Analysis

• AIEQ vs ROBO: AI-Managed vs AI-Themed — Two Different Bets in the Same Wrapper

  AIEQ and ROBO both wear "AI" branding, but they are entirely different products: AIEQ uses an AI system as the process for picking US equities; ROBO is a...

  21 May 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• NOBL vs. DGRW: Dividend Aristocrats vs. AI-Filtered Quality Dividend Growth

  Over the past five years, DGRW returned 11.8% annualized versus NOBL's 5.7% — a 6.1-point gap, with DGRW showing slightly lower volatility and drawdown....

  13 May 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• AVUV vs. SYLD: Deep Value Small-Cap vs. AI-Driven Shareholder Yield Selection

  AVUV is a small-cap-value factor sleeve built on the Fama-French academic playbook. SYLD is an all-cap rules-based screen on dividends, buybacks, and debt...

  07 May 2026 11 min ETF Analysis

• VTI vs. AIEQ: Total Market Index vs. IBM Watson’s AI Selection Performance

  Over the trailing five years, VTI compounded at 11.8% annually while AIEQ — the IBM Watson-powered active equity ETF — compounded at 4.4%, a gap of roughly...

  05 May 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• QQQM vs. QRFT: Nasdaq 100 vs. AI-Driven Quality Factor Investing

  QQQM and QRFT both invest in U.S. large caps, but the construction logic — index-mechanical versus model-driven multi-factor — produces very different fee,...

  04 May 2026 11 min ETF Analysis

• SCHD vs. DIVZ: Traditional Dividend Growth vs. AI-Enhanced Yield Strategy

  Over the trailing five years DIVZ outpaced SCHD by roughly 90 bp per year on total return, with lower realized volatility — but at roughly ten times the...

  03 May 2026 11 min ETF Analysis

• SCHD vs VIG: A Quantitative Analysis of Dividend Quality Factors

  VIG outpaced SCHD by roughly 160 basis points per year over the trailing five years (10.3% vs 8.7% CAGR), driven by its broader sector reach and...

  28 Apr 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• The Master Guide to Evidence-Based ETF Portfolios: Using AI to Optimize Allocation (2026)

  "AI-driven portfolio optimization" mostly solves a problem long-horizon investors don't actually have. Real-time tilting at retail frequency tends to cost...

  26 Apr 2026 9 min Long-Term Strategy

• How Jim Simons Built the Medallion Fund: Lessons for the Modern AI Investor

  Medallion's roughly 39% net annualized return over three decades is real, public, and almost entirely a function of capacity — capped near $10B and closed...

  22 Apr 2026 9 min Long-Term Strategy

• Energy Equities and Geopolitical Conflict: When the Relationship Actually Holds

  "Energy equities rise on conflict" is true on average but conditional on physical supply transmission — not on how loud the headlines are. The post-2014...

  11 Apr 2026 12 min Macro & Markets

• How to Start ETF Investing: The Complete 2026 Roadmap

  Starting an ETF portfolio is a sequence of four decisions — horizon, account type, allocation, rebalancing rule. Get that sequence right and the ticker...

  29 Mar 2026 11 min Investment Framework

• What Rising Interest Rates Mean for Leveraged ETF Borrowing Costs

  Leveraged ETFs do not borrow on margin. They obtain exposure through total return swaps whose financing leg is reset daily at short-term rates (Fed Funds or...

  28 Mar 2026 12 min Macro & Markets

• BOTZ vs IRBO: Finding the Most Cost-Effective Entry into Automation

  Over the trailing five years, IRBO's equal-weighted approach delivered an 11.1% CAGR versus BOTZ's 4.3% — a 6.8-point gap that dwarfs the 21 bp fee...

  15 Mar 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• SCHD, AVUV, and VXUS During the Iran–U.S. War Shock Dividend Stability, Small-Cap Risk, and Global Exposure — A Data-Driven ETF Analysis

  SCHD, AVUV, and VXUS occupy three different rows of the factor matrix — quality-dividend, small-cap value, and international beta. The realized data...

  05 Mar 2026 12 min ETF Analysis

• The Tesla Ecosystem Through an ETF Lens: How Long-Horizon Investors Should Think About Concentrated Innovation Bets

  The Tesla ecosystem bundles electrification, energy storage, AI, and robotics into a single corporate balance sheet — which compresses both upside and...

  25 Feb 2026 9 min Macro & Markets

• Do You Really Need International Exposure? (VXUS Explained)

  VXUS holds roughly 8,500 non-US stocks at a 0.05% expense ratio, covering developed and emerging markets in one ticker. Through May 2026, VXUS posted a...

  22 Feb 2026 9 min ETF Analysis