Fund index
VXUS
36 articles on this site analyse VXUS — 8 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-04-30VXUS reports 8,825 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 259.8 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 12.91% of VXUS is held at a quoted market price, across 49 issuer countries , with 2.06% in restricted securities. Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
27Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, VXUS went from behaving like 481.1 equally weighted positions to 259.8 — 46% fewer, while its top ten went from 9.46% to 13.45% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 8,825 | 259.8 | 13.45% | 3.93% |
| 2026-01-31 | 8,721 | 310.7 | 12.43% | 3.24% |
| 2025-10-31 | 8,705 | 332.2 | 11.41% | 3.08% |
| 2025-07-31 | 8,649 | 376.5 | 10.4% | 2.68% |
| 2025-04-30 | 8,623 | 397.3 | 10.27% | 2.06% |
| 2025-01-31 | 8,601 | 381.9 | 10.46% | 2.53% |
| 2024-10-31 | 8,658 | 404.9 | 10.16% | 2.38% |
| 2024-07-31 | 8,672 | 394.2 | 10.77% | 2.21% |
| 2024-04-30 | 8,658 | 394.1 | 11.06% | 1.91% |
| 2024-01-31 | 8,624 | 427.5 | 10.31% | 1.65% |
| 2023-10-31 | 8,588 | 427.2 | 10.4% | 1.5% |
| 2023-07-31 | 8,032 | 436.7 | 10.19% | 1.48% |
| 2023-04-30 | 8,028 | 439.9 | 10.21% | 1.62% |
| 2023-01-31 | 7,950 | 448.8 | 9.9% | 1.5% |
| 2022-10-31 | 8,019 | 460.7 | 9.78% | 1.39% |
| 2022-07-31 | 7,873 | 438.2 | 10.24% | 1.6% |
| 2022-04-30 | 7,917 | 414.5 | 10.74% | 1.92% |
| 2022-01-31 | 7,756 | 436.7 | 10.4% | 1.8% |
| 2021-10-31 | 7,783 | 454.2 | 10.45% | 1.58% |
| 2021-07-31 | 7,615 | 460.4 | 10.48% | 1.57% |
| 2021-04-30 | 7,573 | 411 | 11.19% | 1.71% |
| 2021-01-31 | 7,378 | 416.8 | 11.1% | 1.75% |
| 2020-10-31 | 7,748 | 380.4 | 11.78% | 2.19% |
| 2020-07-31 | 7,376 | 402.5 | 11.24% | 1.81% |
| 2020-04-30 | 7,503 | 367.2 | 12.05% | 2.14% |
| 2020-01-31 | 7,470 | 474.9 | 9.82% | 1.43% |
| 2019-10-31 | 7,477 | 481.1 | 9.46% | 1.55% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
6Measures applied to it
8All articles
36-
Monte Carlo vs the 4% Rule: Simulating Retirement Withdrawals Instead of Assuming Them
The 4% rule is a single conclusion drawn from one country's worst historical sequence; Monte Carlo is a method that asks how often a plan survives across...
-
Target-Date Funds vs a DIY Three-Fund Portfolio: What the Convenience Actually Costs
The headline fee gap between a Vanguard target-date fund and a self-built three-fund portfolio is roughly 0.04% a year — real, but far smaller than most...
-
CALF vs AVUV: Small-Cap Free Cash Flow vs Small-Cap Value — Two Quality Screens
Both funds screen small-caps for "quality," but on different variables: CALF ranks by free-cash-flow yield, AVUV by valuation crossed with profitability....
-
The Three-Fund Portfolio in 2026: What VTI, VXUS, and BND Actually Delivered
Over the trailing five years, VTI did the heavy lifting (12.3% CAGR), VXUS lagged (7.9%), and BND delivered almost nothing (0.1%) — yet that spread is the...
-
VEA vs VWO: Developed vs Emerging Markets — How to Split International Exposure
VEA (developed) and VWO (emerging) are the two halves of total international exposure; held together at market weight they approximate a single...
-
The Mulden Hybrid Portfolio Framework: Quarterly Review (Q2 2026)
Across the 5-year window ending Q2 2026, the framework's diversifiers (gold) and growth tilt (QQQM) carried the return, while the bond sleeve (BND)...
-
Why Tracking Error Matters More Than Expense Ratio in 2026
VOO and IVV both charge 0.03%. The fee debate ends in a tie, which means the right framework question is no longer "which is cheaper?" but "which one tracks...
-
VXUS vs. IQIN: International Stocks vs. AI-Driven Global Multi-Factor Asset Allocation
Over the past five years, the "AI-driven" IQIN underperformed plain market-cap VXUS on every dimension we measured — lower CAGR, higher volatility, deeper...
-
AVUV vs. SYLD: Deep Value Small-Cap vs. AI-Driven Shareholder Yield Selection
AVUV is a small-cap-value factor sleeve built on the Fama-French academic playbook. SYLD is an all-cap rules-based screen on dividends, buybacks, and debt...
-
How Jim Simons Built the Medallion Fund: Lessons for the Modern AI Investor
Medallion's roughly 39% net annualized return over three decades is real, public, and almost entirely a function of capacity — capped near $10B and closed...
-
VXUS vs VOO: Where Should You Invest in 2026?
Over the past decade, VOO compounded at 15.4% annualized; VXUS at 9.7%. The 5.7-percentage-point gap is real, large, and almost entirely a story about one...
-
Is Capital Leaving the US? Global Money Flow Trends Explained
"Capital leaving the US" describes a marginal flow story, not an exodus. The US still anchors roughly 60% of global equity market capitalization, and that...
-
Reading 2026 Capital Flows: The Macro Arithmetic Behind the "Smart Money" Narrative
"Smart money" is mostly a narrative device. The honest version of the question is which 2026 capital flows are large and persistent enough to look...
-
Asset Allocation in Practice: How 10% Weight Shifts Reshape Long-Term Outcomes
Across the trailing five years (2021-2026), a defensive blend (VOO 50 / SCHD 30 / SGOV 20) produced a roughly 10.1% blended CAGR, while a growth-tilted...
-
The Rule of 72 in Practice: What Realized ETF Returns Say About Doubling Time
Applied to realized 5-year CAGRs, the Rule of 72 gives doubling estimates ranging from 4.1 years (QQQM) to 20.6 years (SGOV) — but that range collapses...
-
The Rationale Behind a Five-ETF Long-Term Core: VOO, QQQM, SCHD, VXUS, AVUV
Five funds with non-overlapping roles — broad US beta (VOO), large-cap growth tilt (QQQM), dividend-quality (SCHD), ex-US developed and emerging (VXUS), and...
-
The Final-Decade Asymmetry: How Long-Horizon ETF Compounding Actually Distributes
The arithmetic of a 30-year, $500/month plan at a 9% nominal CAGR has roughly 80% of the terminal balance coming from compounded returns, not from...
-
Compounding Realistically: What 30 Years of Index Investing Actually Looks Like
The "index-fund millionaire" math is real but mundane: at a 9% nominal CAGR, $500/month reaches $1M in roughly 33 years; $2,000/month gets there in 17. The...
-
How to Start ETF Investing: The Complete 2026 Roadmap
Starting an ETF portfolio is a sequence of four decisions — horizon, account type, allocation, rebalancing rule. Get that sequence right and the ticker...
-
Infrastructure in a 30-Year Core: What the Data on XLU and PAVE Actually Shows
"Infrastructure" is two different factor exposures wearing one label: XLU is regulated-utility income, PAVE is industrial build-out cyclicality. Treating...
-
Common Mistakes in Infrastructure Investing and How to Avoid Them
"Infrastructure" is not one asset class. XLU (regulated utilities), PAVE (industrial buildout), and GRID (smart-grid equipment) have different factor...
-
The Impact of 2026 Energy Policies on Your Long-Term Portfolio
Five thematic ways to express a 2026 energy-policy view — PAVE, GRID, NLR, XLU, VXUS — have produced very different 5-year returns, but the risk-adjusted...
-
VXUS vs. a US-Only Core: What International Diversification Actually Adds
Over the trailing five years VXUS underperformed VOO by roughly 540 basis points per year — and the case for holding it does not rest on that window. VXUS's...
-
What SGOV and Gold Actually Do: A Quant Look at Defensive Assets in 2026
SGOV's five-year realized volatility is 0.2% and its worst drawdown was 0.03% — it behaves like cash with a yield, not like a "bond." The 3.9% distribution...
-
The 90/10 Allocation Framework: Pairing Broad Equity, AI Infrastructure, and a Cash Sleeve
The 90/10 template — 90% diversified equity, 10% short-duration Treasury cash — is best understood as a 100% equity policy with a rebalancing buffer, not a...
-
"The Curse of Sequence Risk" – Protecting Your 30-Year Plan from a Pre-Retirement Crash
Sequence-of-returns risk is path-dependent: identical 30-year averages produce wildly different outcomes once withdrawals start, because losses early in...
-
Buy and Hold in 2026: What Rebalancing Discipline Actually Adds to Long-Term ETF Returns
Buy-and-hold is still the right base case for long-horizon ETF investors, but pure drift quietly converts a balanced portfolio into something the investor...
-
Beyond a One-ETF Equity Core: What AVUV and VXUS Actually Add to VOO
Over the last five years VOO has out-returned AVUV (small-cap value) by roughly 310 bp annualized and VXUS (international) by roughly 540 bp — the supposed...
-
VOO, QQQM, and SCHD: What Five-Year Risk and Return Actually Say About a Long-Term Core
QQQM produced the highest five-year CAGR (17.6%), but at 22.3% realized volatility and a −35.0% drawdown — a single-regime number, not a permanent ranking....
-
SCHD, AVUV, and VXUS During the Iran–U.S. War Shock Dividend Stability, Small-Cap Risk, and Global Exposure — A Data-Driven ETF Analysis
SCHD, AVUV, and VXUS occupy three different rows of the factor matrix — quality-dividend, small-cap value, and international beta. The realized data...
-
If War Triggers a Market Correction, Do Long-Term ETF Investors Actually Lose Money? (10+ Year Analysis)
Across decades of S&P 500 history, the median geopolitical shock produces a sharp initial drop followed by a positive 12-month return — recovery is...
-
Single-Country ETFs vs Global Diversification: A Structural Long-Horizon Comparison
A single-country ETF and a broad ex-US fund look comparable at a glance, but they sit on opposite sides of a diversification trade — one is a concentrated...
-
KOSPI 200 ETF Strategy: How It Fits in a Long-Term Global Portfolio
KOSPI 200 is not a regional bet — it is concentrated exposure to global memory-chip cycles, export manufacturing, and KRW currency dynamics. Samsung...
-
Do You Really Need International Exposure? (VXUS Explained)
VXUS holds roughly 8,500 non-US stocks at a 0.05% expense ratio, covering developed and emerging markets in one ticker. Through May 2026, VXUS posted a...
-
AVUV and the Case for Small-Cap Value Patience
AVUV is a quality-screened small-cap value ETF: factor exposure with a profitability filter, not pure book-to-market deep value. The five-year record (10.8%...
-
Why Central Bank Policy Divergence in 2026 Matters for Long-Term ETF Investors
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.