Fund · Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund · measured from SEC filings
VXUS holdings
VXUS reports 8,832 holdings and behaves like 253.6 equally weighted ones, computed from its SEC Form N-PORT filing for 2026-07-31. The fact sheet publishes the first number; this page computes the second, and traces it across 27 quarters of filings.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-07-31Read this figure with the following in mind
1.7% of net assets is securities-lending cash collateral, excluded from the figure; counted as filed the fund would read 238.5
The figure below is what the filing says, published unchanged. What it may not do is sit beside a plain long-only fund and be read as the same quantity. How comparability is decided.
Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 12.5% at a quoted market price (level 1), 48 issuer countries, 1.99% restricted securities.
What stands out
as of 2026-07-31VXUS's largest investment is TSMC at 3.93% of net assets. Samsung Electron and ASML Holding NV follow; the three together are 6.89%. Ten companies are 13.32% of the fund; the other 8,822 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, VXUS behaves like 253.6 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 6.0 times the median. Across 27 quarterly filings VXUS has become more concentrated: it behaved like 550.4 at 2019-10-31 and 280.1 at 2026-04-30. Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 215 positions were added and 126 dropped; 8.4% of the weight moved. Japan is the largest country at 15.01% of the portfolio, across 48 countries in the filing.
Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.
Every filing since 2019
27Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, VXUS went from behaving like 550.4 equally weighted positions to 280.1 — 49% fewer, while its top ten went from 8.42% to 12.41% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 8,824 | 280.1 | 12.41% | 3.94% |
| 2026-01-31 | 8,720 | 330.6 | 11.66% | 3.25% |
| 2025-10-31 | 8,704 | 350.7 | 10.76% | 3.08% |
| 2025-07-31 | 8,648 | 402.1 | 9.71% | 2.68% |
| 2025-04-30 | 8,622 | 445.1 | 9.28% | 2.07% |
| 2025-01-31 | 8,599 | 403.6 | 9.94% | 2.53% |
| 2024-10-31 | 8,656 | 420.7 | 9.86% | 2.38% |
| 2024-07-31 | 8,670 | 412.6 | 10.43% | 2.21% |
Earlier filings (19 more, back to 2019-10-31)
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | 8,656 | 436.2 | 10.2% | 1.92% |
| 2024-01-31 | 8,622 | 452.9 | 9.86% | 1.65% |
| 2023-10-31 | 8,586 | 467.9 | 9.7% | 1.51% |
| 2023-07-31 | 8,030 | 480.2 | 9.47% | 1.48% |
| 2023-04-30 | 8,026 | 490.7 | 9.41% | 1.4% |
| 2023-01-31 | 7,948 | 490.2 | 9.25% | 1.5% |
| 2022-10-31 | 8,017 | 502.8 | 9.12% | 1.23% |
| 2022-07-31 | 7,871 | 489.3 | 9.42% | 1.54% |
| 2022-04-30 | 7,915 | 484.5 | 9.6% | 1.55% |
| 2022-01-31 | 7,754 | 476 | 9.65% | 1.8% |
| 2021-10-31 | 7,781 | 492.2 | 9.74% | 1.59% |
| 2021-07-31 | 7,613 | 481.3 | 10.1% | 1.58% |
| 2021-04-30 | 7,571 | 473.7 | 10% | 1.6% |
| 2021-01-31 | 7,376 | 436.2 | 10.65% | 1.75% |
| 2020-10-31 | 7,746 | 407.3 | 11.05% | 2.18% |
| 2020-07-31 | 7,374 | 423.7 | 10.82% | 1.8% |
| 2020-04-30 | 7,501 | 447.3 | 10.39% | 1.66% |
| 2020-01-31 | 7,469 | 503.6 | 9.4% | 1.41% |
| 2019-10-31 | 7,476 | 550.4 | 8.42% | 1.24% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Compared with, in the essays
6Overlap with other funds
20Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.
| With | Overlap | Shared | Combined effective |
|---|---|---|---|
| VXUS vs VEA | 71.67% | 2,996 | 313.8 |
| VXUS vs VT | 36.77% | 3,356 | 305.5 |
| VXUS vs VWO | 26.3% | 2,318 | 96.7 |
| VXUS vs VTV | 0.79% | 3 | 285.6 |
| VXUS vs BND | 0.73% | 1 | 824.2 |
| VXUS vs VIG | 0.7% | 4 | 196 |
| VXUS vs QQQ | 0.42% | 3 | 121.5 |
| VXUS vs VTI | 0.4% | 5 | 215.7 |
| VXUS vs QQQM | 0.37% | 2 | 114.7 |
| VXUS vs VOO | 0.34% | 1 | 173.8 |
10 more pairs, down to 0% overlap
| With | Overlap | Shared | Combined effective |
|---|---|---|---|
| VXUS vs VUG | 0.25% | 4 | 73.9 |
| VXUS vs VGT | 0.12% | 2 | 57.2 |
| VXUS vs ITOT | 0.11% | 4 | 213.4 |
| VXUS vs AGG | 0% | 0 | 746.5 |
| VXUS vs IVV | 0% | 1 | 173.9 |
| VXUS vs SCHD | 0% | 0 | 114.9 |
| VXUS vs SGOV | 0% | 0 | 64.6 |
| VXUS vs SMH | 0% | 0 | 53 |
| VXUS vs XLK | 0% | 0 | 61.6 |
| VXUS vs AVUV | 0% | 0 | 551.4 |
As filed, collateral included
1.66% collateralVXUS's filing lists 8,833 positions including 1.66% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 238.5 effective holdings with a top ten of 14.27%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 253.6 with a top ten of 13.32%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.
Largest positions, as filed
as of 2026-04-30The 15 largest of 8,832 positions in VXUS's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: listed with the point-in-time files, available on request.
| # | Position | Weight | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 4.01% | 4.0% |
| 2 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | 1.69% | 5.7% |
| 3 | ASML Holding NV | 1.33% | 7.0% |
| 4 | SK hynix Inc | 1.15% | 8.2% |
| 5 | Tencent Holdings Ltd | 0.89% | 9.1% |
| 6 | HSBC Holdings PLC | 0.75% | 9.8% |
| 7 | Vanguard Cmt Funds-Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund | 0.75% | 10.6% |
| 8 | Alibaba Group Holding Ltd | 0.70% | 11.3% |
| 9 | Roche Holding AG | 0.68% | 11.9% |
| 10 | AstraZeneca PLC | 0.68% | 12.6% |
| 11 | Novartis AG | 0.67% | 13.3% |
| 12 | Nestle SA | 0.62% | 13.9% |
| 13 | Shell PLC | 0.61% | 14.5% |
| 14 | Royal Bank of Canada | 0.60% | 15.1% |
| 15 | Siemens AG | 0.52% | 15.6% |
By country of issuer
as of 2026-04-30Share of VXUS's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.
| Country | Share |
|---|---|
| Japan | 14.90% |
| United Kingdom | 8.69% |
| Canada | 8.03% |
| Taiwan | 7.88% |
| Hong Kong SAR China | 6.74% |
| South Korea | 5.91% |
| France | 5.18% |
| Switzerland | 5.05% |
Returns the fund reported
2019-08 – 2026-04Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of VXUS's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.
Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.11 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: VXUS.json · all funds.
Who borrows VXUS's shares
2026-07-31The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $10.3bn was out to 24 borrowers. The largest, J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES PLC, held 25.5% of it.
| Borrower | On loan | Share of the loan |
|---|---|---|
| J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES PLC | $2.6bn | 25.5% |
| MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INTERNATIONAL PLC | $1.7bn | 16.8% |
| GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. | $1.5bn | 14.3% |
| MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC | $967m | 9.4% |
| JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC | $784m | 7.6% |
The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter VXUS has filed, with each borrower: VXUS.json · all funds.
Since the previous filing
2026-01-31 → 2026-04-308,614 positions became 8,703: 215 added (1.1% of the fund at the later date), 126 dropped (1.1% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 8.4%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of VXUS compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.
| Largest increases | 2026-01-31 | 2026-04-30 | Largest decreases | 2026-01-31 | 2026-04-30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 3.25% | 3.94% | Tencent Holdings Ltd | 1.15% | 0.88% |
| Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | 1.26% | 1.66% | Alibaba Group Holding Ltd | 0.92% | 0.69% |
| Vanguard Cmt Funds-Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund | 0.36% | 0.73% | Novo Nordisk A/S | 0.46% | 0.32% |
| SK hynix Inc | 0.82% | 1.13% | Toyota Motor Corp | 0.58% | 0.48% |
| Delta Electronics Inc | 0.18% | 0.32% | SAP SE | 0.50% | 0.40% |
| MediaTek Inc | 0.20% | 0.29% | LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE | 0.40% | 0.32% |
New: Roche Holding AG (0.67%), Sunbelt Rentals Holdings Inc (0.07%), KE Holdings Inc (0.02%), Abivax SA (0.02%), Vedanta Ltd (0.01%), Zijin Gold International Co Ltd (0.01%). Gone: Roche Holding AG (0.78%), Ashtead Group PLC (0.07%), Toyota Industries Corp (0.05%), KE Holdings Inc (0.03%), JDE Peet's NV (0.01%), New Gold Inc (0.01%).
Asset categories and pricing
as of 2026-07-31| Asset category (as filed) | Share of investments |
|---|---|
| equity EC | 96.92% |
| short-term investment STIV | 2.36% |
| preferred equity EP | 0.71% |
| derivative DE | 0.01% |
12.5% of VXUS is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1); 0.0% at level 3, priced from the filer's own inputs. Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.
Derivative exposure and counterparties
as of 2026-04-30A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $629.12B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.
| Swap counterparty | Notional | % of net assets |
|---|---|---|
| Goldman Sachs | $425M | 0.07% |
| MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC | $386M | 0.06% |
| Bank of America NA | $275M | 0.04% |
| Goldman Sachs International | $74M | 0.01% |
| CITIBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | $8M | 0% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | $2M | 0% |
Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OBFR01 + 0% on $1.17B of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.
Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).
Neighbours by effective holdings, equity funds
10Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of VXUS (253.6). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.
| Fund | Reports | Behaves like | Top ten | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 507 | 239.5 | 11.25% | 2026-06-30 |
| SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1,707 | 240.7 | 10.53% | 2026-05-31 |
| BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 978 | 243.1 | 12.21% | 2026-07-31 |
| USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 289 | 246.9 | 6.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 1,883 | 252.9 | 12.26% | 2026-05-31 |
| IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 2,630 | 267.8 | 11.97% | 2026-07-31 |
| VEA Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund | 3,890 | 268.9 | 13.15% | 2026-06-30 |
| AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | 797 | 272.3 | 8.67% | 2026-05-31 |
| KOMP State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | 505 | 272.8 | 9.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index Fund | 403 | 276.9 | 8.32% | 2026-05-31 |
Measures applied in the essays
8On video
1The same filings read aloud in under a minute. Links open YouTube; nothing from it loads on this page.
Essays that examine VXUS
37-
Why 2,017 IWM Holdings Read as 33: Securities Lending in the Russell 2000 ETF
IWM, the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, files 2,017 holdings but our concentration measure read it as 33. The cause is a 17% cash-collateral position from securities lending, flagged in the filing itself; set it aside and the fund's own investments behave like about 840. Seventy-three funds on this site, including IJH, IJR, RSP, LQD and HYG, had the same problem. What we found, what we changed today, and what is still open.
-
Monte Carlo vs the 4% Rule: Simulating Retirement Withdrawals Instead of Assuming Them
The 4% rule is a single conclusion drawn from one country's worst historical sequence; Monte Carlo is a method that asks how often a plan survives across...
-
Target-Date Funds vs a DIY Three-Fund Portfolio: What the Convenience Actually Costs
The headline fee gap between a Vanguard target-date fund and a self-built three-fund portfolio is roughly 0.04% a year — real, but far smaller than most...
-
CALF vs AVUV: Small-Cap Free Cash Flow vs Small-Cap Value — Two Quality Screens
Both funds screen small-caps for "quality," but on different variables: CALF ranks by free-cash-flow yield, AVUV by valuation crossed with profitability....
-
The Three-Fund Portfolio in 2026: What VTI, VXUS, and BND Actually Delivered
Over the trailing five years, VTI did the heavy lifting (12.3% CAGR), VXUS lagged (7.9%), and BND delivered almost nothing (0.1%) — yet that spread is the...
-
VEA vs VWO: Developed vs Emerging Markets — How to Split International Exposure
VEA (developed) and VWO (emerging) are the two halves of total international exposure; held together at market weight they approximate a single...
-
The Mulden Hybrid Portfolio Framework: Quarterly Review (Q2 2026)
Across the 5-year window ending Q2 2026, the framework's diversifiers (gold) and growth tilt (QQQM) carried the return, while the bond sleeve (BND)...
-
Why Tracking Error Matters More Than Expense Ratio in 2026
VOO and IVV both charge 0.03%. The fee debate ends in a tie, which means the right framework question is no longer "which is cheaper?" but "which one tracks...
-
VXUS vs. IQIN: International Stocks vs. AI-Driven Global Multi-Factor Asset Allocation
Over the past five years, the "AI-driven" IQIN underperformed plain market-cap VXUS on every dimension we measured — lower CAGR, higher volatility, deeper...
-
AVUV vs. SYLD: Deep Value Small-Cap vs. AI-Driven Shareholder Yield Selection
AVUV is a small-cap-value factor sleeve built on the Fama-French academic playbook. SYLD is an all-cap rules-based screen on dividends, buybacks, and debt...
-
How Jim Simons Built the Medallion Fund: Lessons for the Modern AI Investor
Medallion's roughly 39% net annualized return over three decades is real, public, and almost entirely a function of capacity — capped near $10B and closed...
-
VXUS vs VOO: 9,336 Stocks Between Them and Exactly One in Common
Over the past decade, VOO compounded at 15.4% annualized; VXUS at 9.7%. The 5.7-percentage-point gap is real, large, and almost entirely a story about one...
-
Is Capital Leaving the US? Global Money Flow Trends Explained
"Capital leaving the US" describes a marginal flow story, not an exodus. The US still anchors roughly 60% of global equity market capitalization, and that...
-
Reading 2026 Capital Flows: The Macro Arithmetic Behind the "Smart Money" Narrative
"Smart money" is mostly a narrative device. The honest version of the question is which 2026 capital flows are large and persistent enough to look...
-
Asset Allocation in Practice: How 10% Weight Shifts Reshape Long-Term Outcomes
Across the trailing five years (2021-2026), a defensive blend (VOO 50 / SCHD 30 / SGOV 20) produced a roughly 10.1% blended CAGR, while a growth-tilted...
-
The Rule of 72 in Practice: What Realized ETF Returns Say About Doubling Time
Applied to realized 5-year CAGRs, the Rule of 72 gives doubling estimates ranging from 4.1 years (QQQM) to 20.6 years (SGOV) — but that range collapses...
-
The Rationale Behind a Five-ETF Long-Term Core: VOO, QQQM, SCHD, VXUS, AVUV
Five funds with non-overlapping roles — broad US beta (VOO), large-cap growth tilt (QQQM), dividend-quality (SCHD), ex-US developed and emerging (VXUS), and...
-
The Final-Decade Asymmetry: How Long-Horizon ETF Compounding Actually Distributes
The arithmetic of a 30-year, $500/month plan at a 9% nominal CAGR has roughly 80% of the terminal balance coming from compounded returns, not from...
-
Compounding Realistically: What 30 Years of Index Investing Actually Looks Like
The "index-fund millionaire" math is real but mundane: at a 9% nominal CAGR, $500/month reaches $1M in roughly 33 years; $2,000/month gets there in 17. The...
-
How to Start ETF Investing: The Complete 2026 Roadmap
Starting an ETF portfolio is a sequence of four decisions — horizon, account type, allocation, rebalancing rule. Get that sequence right and the ticker...
-
Infrastructure in a 30-Year Core: What the Data on XLU and PAVE Actually Shows
"Infrastructure" is two different factor exposures wearing one label: XLU is regulated-utility income, PAVE is industrial build-out cyclicality. Treating...
-
Common Mistakes in Infrastructure Investing and How to Avoid Them
"Infrastructure" is not one asset class. XLU (regulated utilities), PAVE (industrial buildout), and GRID (smart-grid equipment) have different factor...
-
The Impact of 2026 Energy Policies on Your Long-Term Portfolio
Five thematic ways to express a 2026 energy-policy view — PAVE, GRID, NLR, XLU, VXUS — have produced very different 5-year returns, but the risk-adjusted...
-
VXUS vs. a US-Only Core: What International Diversification Actually Adds
Over the trailing five years VXUS underperformed VOO by roughly 540 basis points per year — and the case for holding it does not rest on that window. VXUS's...
-
What SGOV and Gold Actually Do: A Quant Look at Defensive Assets in 2026
SGOV's five-year realized volatility is 0.2% and its worst drawdown was 0.03% — it behaves like cash with a yield, not like a "bond." The 3.9% distribution...
-
The 90/10 Allocation Framework: Pairing Broad Equity, AI Infrastructure, and a Cash Sleeve
The 90/10 template — 90% diversified equity, 10% short-duration Treasury cash — is best understood as a 100% equity policy with a rebalancing buffer, not a...
-
"The Curse of Sequence Risk" – Protecting Your 30-Year Plan from a Pre-Retirement Crash
Sequence-of-returns risk is path-dependent: identical 30-year averages produce wildly different outcomes once withdrawals start, because losses early in...
-
Buy and Hold in 2026: What Rebalancing Discipline Actually Adds to Long-Term ETF Returns
Buy-and-hold is still the right base case for long-horizon ETF investors, but pure drift quietly converts a balanced portfolio into something the investor...
-
Beyond a One-ETF Equity Core: What AVUV and VXUS Actually Add to VOO
Over the last five years VOO has out-returned AVUV (small-cap value) by roughly 310 bp annualized and VXUS (international) by roughly 540 bp — the supposed...
-
VOO, QQQM and SCHD: One Behaves Like 52 Holdings, the Other Two Like 32 Each
QQQM produced the highest five-year CAGR (17.6%), but at 22.3% realized volatility and a −35.0% drawdown — a single-regime number, not a permanent ranking....
-
SCHD, AVUV, and VXUS During the Iran–U.S. War Shock Dividend Stability, Small-Cap Risk, and Global Exposure — A Data-Driven ETF Analysis
SCHD, AVUV, and VXUS occupy three different rows of the factor matrix — quality-dividend, small-cap value, and international beta. The realized data...
-
If War Triggers a Market Correction, Do Long-Term ETF Investors Actually Lose Money? (10+ Year Analysis)
Across decades of S&P 500 history, the median geopolitical shock produces a sharp initial drop followed by a positive 12-month return — recovery is...
-
Single-Country ETFs vs Global Diversification: A Structural Long-Horizon Comparison
A single-country ETF and a broad ex-US fund look comparable at a glance, but they sit on opposite sides of a diversification trade — one is a concentrated...
-
KOSPI 200 ETF Strategy: How It Fits in a Long-Term Global Portfolio
KOSPI 200 is not a regional bet — it is concentrated exposure to global memory-chip cycles, export manufacturing, and KRW currency dynamics. Samsung...
-
Do You Really Need International Exposure? (VXUS Explained)
VXUS holds roughly 8,500 non-US stocks at a 0.05% expense ratio, covering developed and emerging markets in one ticker. Through May 2026, VXUS posted a...
-
AVUV and the Case for Small-Cap Value Patience
AVUV is a quality-screened small-cap value ETF: factor exposure with a profitability filter, not pure book-to-market deep value. The five-year record (10.8%...
-
Why Central Bank Policy Divergence in 2026 Matters for Long-Term ETF Investors
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.