257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Overlap · from SEC filings

VGT vs VTI: what actually overlaps

VGT and VTI: 35.33% of a dollar ends up in the same companies either way (SEC Form N-PORT, 2026-05-31 and 2026-06-30), across 257 securities the two funds both hold. Every free comparison tool can list the tickers in common; this weights them, which is the part that decides whether owning both changes anything.

35.33%Overlap by weight
257Shared holdings
29.9Combined effective holdings
-37.1 vs VTI alone

The short version

Held alone, VGT behaves like 15.1 equally weighted positions and VTI like 67. Held together in equal size they behave like 29.9 — less diversified than holding VTI on its own. The two funds hold 257 of the same securities, 35.33% of a dollar by weight, so the pair buys those companies twice.

Overlap here is the sum, over securities both funds hold, of the smaller of the two weights: the share of a dollar that sits in the same company either way. Matching is on CUSIP. Figures are as of each fund's own reporting date (2026-05-31 and 2026-06-30), which do not always align.

Not 50/50, or holding a third fund alongside these two? The portfolio calculator runs this same math for any weights, across up to 12 funds.

Side by side

as filed
VGTVTI
Assets$172B$2300B
Holdings3062,006
Effective holdings15.167
Top ten weight59.38%32.02%
Largest position16.83%6.35%
Priced at market (Level 1)100%100%
Reporting date2026-05-312026-06-30

Each fund on its own: VGT · VTI

Where the overlap actually is

257

The ten shared positions that account for the most of it, with what each fund holds of its own. Shared is the lesser of the two — the part that is held in common either way. Where the two columns diverge, one fund is making a larger bet on that company than the other, and holding both does not average it away.

CompanyVGTVTIShared
NVIDIA Corp 16.828% 6.353% 6.353%
Apple Inc 14.574% 5.869% 5.869%
Microsoft Corp 9.46% 3.827% 3.827%
Broadcom Inc 4.208% 2.47% 2.47%
Micron Technology Inc 4.202% 1.798% 1.798%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.21% 1.308% 1.308%
Applied Materials Inc 1.396% 0.793% 0.793%
Intel Corp 2.032% 0.775% 0.775%
Lam Research Corp 1.559% 0.748% 0.748%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.853% 0.575% 0.575%

What the difference is made of

0.89% · 64.05%

0.89% of VGT sits in companies VTI does not hold at all, and 64.05% of VTI in companies VGT does not hold. The largest of each, by weight in its own fund:

Only in VGT (0.89%)
  • NXP Semiconductors NV
  • Clearwater Analytics Holdings Inc
  • Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc
  • SolarEdge Technologies Inc
  • Everforth Inc
Only in VTI (64.05%)
  • Amazon.com Inc
  • Alphabet Inc
  • Alphabet Inc
  • Meta Platforms Inc
  • Tesla Inc

What each fund did last quarter

Each fund's newest filing against its previous one. A pair whose overlap is rising or falling does so because of these moves; the figures are the same ones on each fund's page and in its feed.

FundPeriodPositionsAddedDroppedTurnoverLargest increase
VGT 2026-02-28 → 2026-05-31 320 → 318 358.7% Micron Technology Inc 2.41% → 4.2%
VTI 2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30 3,467 → 3,485 1271099.0% Micron Technology Inc 0.61% → 1.8%

Related comparisons

8

Other pairs involving VGT or VTI, ordered by how much they overlap.

PairOverlapCombined effective
ITOT vs VTI 95.07% 66.6
VOO vs VTI 88.3% 58.6
IVV vs VTI 85.64% 58.6
VGT vs XLK 78.84% 15.9
VT vs VTI 60.65% 98.3
VGT vs VUG 55.65% 18.5
QQQM vs VGT 53.73% 23.4
VTI vs VUG 52.3% 34.1

Sources and limits

Computed from SEC Form N-PORT (NPORT-P), the portfolio report every registered US fund files. Positions below 0.001% of net assets are dropped; weights are normalised to each filing's own total.

Unit investment trusts including SPY and DIA do not file N-PORT, so no overlap can be computed for them. Where a comparison is missing from this site, that is usually why rather than an oversight.

Overlap says what is held in common, not what will move together. Two funds with no shared holdings can still fall together, and the effective holding count takes no account of correlation. All 275 pairs are in the concentration dataset, and every fund's own history is on its fund page.