257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Overlap · from SEC filings

ITOT vs VTI: what actually overlaps

ITOT and VTI: 95.07% of a dollar ends up in the same companies either way (SEC Form N-PORT, 2026-06-30), across 1890 securities the two funds both hold. Every free comparison tool can list the tickers in common; this weights them, which is the part that decides whether owning both changes anything.

95.07%Overlap by weight
1890Shared holdings
66.6Combined effective holdings
-0.4 vs VTI alone

The short version

Held alone, ITOT behaves like 66 equally weighted positions and VTI like 67. Held together in equal size they behave like 66.6 — no better than holding VTI on its own. At 95.07% overlap the second fund is largely buying the same companies again.

Overlap here is the sum, over securities both funds hold, of the smaller of the two weights: the share of a dollar that sits in the same company either way. Matching is on CUSIP. Figures are as of each fund's own reporting date (2026-06-30 and 2026-06-30), which do not always align.

Not 50/50, or holding a third fund alongside these two? The portfolio calculator runs this same math for any weights, across up to 12 funds.

Side by side

as filed
ITOTVTI
Assets$96B$2300B
Holdings2,1182,006
Effective holdings6667
Top ten weight32.12%32.02%
Largest position6.63%6.35%
Priced at market (Level 1)99.99%100%
Reporting date2026-06-302026-06-30

Each fund on its own: ITOT · VTI

Where the overlap actually is

1890

The ten shared positions that account for the most of it, with what each fund holds of its own. Shared is the lesser of the two — the part that is held in common either way. Where the two columns diverge, one fund is making a larger bet on that company than the other, and holding both does not average it away.

CompanyITOTVTIShared
NVIDIA Corp. 6.63% 6.353% 6.353%
Apple, Inc. 5.814% 5.869% 5.814%
Microsoft Corp. 3.79% 3.827% 3.79%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.192% 3.187% 3.187%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.865% 2.894% 2.865%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.447% 2.47% 2.447%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.287% 2.279% 2.279%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.781% 1.798% 1.781%
Meta Platforms, Inc. 1.692% 1.708% 1.692%
Tesla, Inc. 1.621% 1.636% 1.621%

What the difference is made of

3.52% · 3.32%

3.52% of ITOT sits in companies VTI does not hold at all, and 3.32% of VTI in companies ITOT does not hold. The largest of each, by weight in its own fund:

Only in ITOT (3.52%)
  • Linde plc
  • Seagate Technology Holdings plc
  • Eaton Corp. plc
  • BlackRock Funds III
  • Chubb Ltd.
Only in VTI (3.32%)
  • Linde PLC
  • Seagate Technology Holdings PLC
  • Vanguard Cmt Funds-Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund
  • Eaton Corp PLC
  • Chubb Ltd

By country of issuer

2026-06-30

Where each fund's money sits by the issuer country its filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Two funds can share companies and still differ here, and a pair that looks diversified by name can be one country twice.

CountryITOTVTIDifference
United States 96.71% 100.00% −3.29
Ireland° 1.88% 0.00% +1.88
Switzerland 0.29% 0.00% +0.29
Bermuda° 0.26% 0.00% +0.26
Cayman Islands° 0.16% 0.00% +0.16
Netherlands° 0.14% 0.00% +0.14
Liberia° 0.11% 0.00% +0.11
United Kingdom 0.10% 0.00% +0.10
Curaçao° 0.09% 0.00% +0.09
Singapore 0.08% 0.00% +0.08

What each fund did last quarter

Each fund's newest filing against its previous one. A pair whose overlap is rising or falling does so because of these moves; the figures are the same ones on each fund's page and in its feed.

FundPeriodPositionsAddedDroppedTurnoverLargest increase
ITOT 2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30 2,478 → 2,487 64559.0% Micron Technology, Inc. 0.6% → 1.78%
VTI 2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30 3,467 → 3,485 1271099.0% Micron Technology Inc 0.61% → 1.8%

Related comparisons

8

Other pairs involving ITOT or VTI, ordered by how much they overlap.

PairOverlapCombined effective
VOO vs VTI 88.3% 58.6
ITOT vs IVV 88.27% 58.1
ITOT vs VOO 85.66% 58.2
IVV vs VTI 85.64% 58.6
VT vs VTI 60.65% 98.3
ITOT vs VT 58.62% 97.6
VTI vs VUG 52.3% 34.1
ITOT vs VUG 51.54% 33.9

Sources and limits

Computed from SEC Form N-PORT (NPORT-P), the portfolio report every registered US fund files. Positions below 0.001% of net assets are dropped; weights are normalised to each filing's own total.

Unit investment trusts including SPY and DIA do not file N-PORT, so no overlap can be computed for them. Where a comparison is missing from this site, that is usually why rather than an oversight.

Overlap says what is held in common, not what will move together. Two funds with no shared holdings can still fall together, and the effective holding count takes no account of correlation. All 275 pairs are in the concentration dataset, and every fund's own history is on its fund page.