257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Overlap · from SEC filings

VOO vs VTI: what actually overlaps

VOO and VTI: 88.3% of a dollar ends up in the same companies either way (SEC Form N-PORT, 2026-06-30), across 503 securities the two funds both hold. Every free comparison tool can list the tickers in common; this weights them, which is the part that decides whether owning both changes anything.

The 55-second version, same figures: VOO + VTI: owning both makes you less diversified (YouTube, opens off-site).

88.3%Overlap by weight
503Shared holdings
58.6Combined effective holdings
-8.4 vs VTI alone

The short version

Held alone, VOO behaves like 51.6 equally weighted positions and VTI like 67. Held together in equal size they behave like 58.6 — less diversified than holding VTI on its own. The two funds hold 503 of the same securities, 88.3% of a dollar by weight, so the pair buys those companies twice.

Overlap here is the sum, over securities both funds hold, of the smaller of the two weights: the share of a dollar that sits in the same company either way. Matching is on CUSIP. Figures are as of each fund's own reporting date (2026-06-30 and 2026-06-30), which do not always align.

Not 50/50, or holding a third fund alongside these two? The portfolio calculator runs this same math for any weights, across up to 12 funds.

Side by side

as filed
VOOVTI
Assets$1674B$2300B
Holdings5052,006
Effective holdings51.667
Top ten weight36.37%32.02%
Largest position7.51%6.35%
Priced at market (Level 1)100%100%
Reporting date2026-06-302026-06-30

Each fund on its own: VOO · VTI

Where the overlap actually is

503

The ten shared positions that account for the most of it, with what each fund holds of its own. Shared is the lesser of the two — the part that is held in common either way. Where the two columns diverge, one fund is making a larger bet on that company than the other, and holding both does not average it away.

CompanyVOOVTIShared
NVIDIA Corp 7.507% 6.353% 6.353%
Apple Inc 6.584% 5.869% 5.869%
Microsoft Corp 4.293% 3.827% 3.827%
Amazon.com Inc 3.614% 3.187% 3.187%
Alphabet Inc 3.246% 2.894% 2.894%
Broadcom Inc 2.771% 2.47% 2.47%
Alphabet Inc 2.587% 2.279% 2.279%
Micron Technology Inc 2.017% 1.798% 1.798%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.916% 1.708% 1.708%
Tesla Inc 1.834% 1.636% 1.636%

What the difference is made of

0.14% · 11.23%

0.14% of VOO sits in companies VTI does not hold at all, and 11.23% of VTI in companies VOO does not hold. The largest of each, by weight in its own fund:

Only in VOO (0.14%)
  • NXP Semiconductors NV
  • Amcor PLC
Only in VTI (11.23%)
  • Space Exploration Technologies Corp
  • Snowflake Inc
  • Bloom Energy Corp
  • Cloudflare Inc
  • Astera Labs Inc

What each fund did last quarter

Each fund's newest filing against its previous one. A pair whose overlap is rising or falling does so because of these moves; the figures are the same ones on each fund's page and in its feed.

FundPeriodPositionsAddedDroppedTurnoverLargest increase
VOO 2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30 505 → 507 1088.8% Micron Technology Inc 0.68% → 2.02%
VTI 2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30 3,467 → 3,485 1271099.0% Micron Technology Inc 0.61% → 1.8%

Written about this pair

3

This page is the measurement. These essays argue about what it means, with the figures as they stood when each was written.

Related comparisons

8

Other pairs involving VOO or VTI, ordered by how much they overlap.

PairOverlapCombined effective
IVV vs VOO 96.8% 51.6
ITOT vs VTI 95.07% 66.6
ITOT vs VOO 85.66% 58.2
IVV vs VTI 85.64% 58.6
VT vs VTI 60.65% 98.3
VOO vs VUG 57.49% 31
VOO vs VT 55.1% 83.7
QQQ vs VOO 54.46% 44.2

Sources and limits

Computed from SEC Form N-PORT (NPORT-P), the portfolio report every registered US fund files. Positions below 0.001% of net assets are dropped; weights are normalised to each filing's own total.

Unit investment trusts including SPY and DIA do not file N-PORT, so no overlap can be computed for them. Where a comparison is missing from this site, that is usually why rather than an oversight.

Overlap says what is held in common, not what will move together. Two funds with no shared holdings can still fall together, and the effective holding count takes no account of correlation. All 275 pairs are in the concentration dataset, and every fund's own history is on its fund page.