257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Overlap · from SEC filings

VT vs VTI: what actually overlaps

VT and VTI: 60.65% of a dollar ends up in the same companies either way (SEC Form N-PORT, 2026-04-30 and 2026-06-30), across 1433 securities the two funds both hold. Every free comparison tool can list the tickers in common; this weights them, which is the part that decides whether owning both changes anything.

60.65%Overlap by weight
1433Shared holdings
98.3Combined effective holdings
-45.3 vs VT alone

The short version

Held alone, VT behaves like 143.6 equally weighted positions and VTI like 67. Held together in equal size they behave like 98.3 — less diversified than holding VT on its own. The two funds hold 1433 of the same securities, 60.65% of a dollar by weight, so the pair buys those companies twice.

Overlap here is the sum, over securities both funds hold, of the smaller of the two weights: the share of a dollar that sits in the same company either way. Matching is on CUSIP. Figures are as of each fund's own reporting date (2026-04-30 and 2026-06-30), which do not always align.

Not 50/50, or holding a third fund alongside these two? The portfolio calculator runs this same math for any weights, across up to 12 funds.

Side by side

as filed
VTVTI
Assets$90B$2300B
Holdings4,8832,006
Effective holdings143.667
Top ten weight21.52%32.02%
Largest position4.07%6.35%
Priced at market (Level 1)66.32%100%
Reporting date2026-04-302026-06-30

Each fund on its own: VT · VTI

Where the overlap actually is

1433

The ten shared positions that account for the most of it, with what each fund holds of its own. Shared is the lesser of the two — the part that is held in common either way. Where the two columns diverge, one fund is making a larger bet on that company than the other, and holding both does not average it away.

CompanyVTVTIShared
NVIDIA Corp 4.191% 6.353% 4.191%
Apple Inc 3.507% 5.869% 3.507%
Microsoft Corp 2.713% 3.827% 2.713%
Amazon.com Inc 2.281% 3.187% 2.281%
Alphabet Inc 2.03% 2.894% 2.03%
Broadcom Inc 1.73% 2.47% 1.73%
Alphabet Inc 1.599% 2.279% 1.599%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.199% 1.708% 1.199%
Tesla Inc 0.966% 1.636% 0.966%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.712% 1.118% 0.712%

What the difference is made of

37.04% · 1.9%

37.04% of VT sits in companies VTI does not hold at all, and 1.9% of VTI in companies VT does not hold. The largest of each, by weight in its own fund:

Only in VT (37.04%)
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd
  • Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
  • ASML Holding NV
  • SK hynix Inc
  • Tencent Holdings Ltd
Only in VTI (1.9%)
  • Space Exploration Technologies Corp
  • Honeywell International Inc
  • Honeywell Aerospace Inc
  • Carnival Corp Ltd
  • DuPont de Nemours Inc

By country of issuer

2026-04-30 · 2026-06-30

Where each fund's money sits by the issuer country its filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Two funds can share companies and still differ here, and a pair that looks diversified by name can be one country twice.

CountryVTVTIDifference
United States 61.97% 100.00% −38.03
Japan 5.73% 0.00% +5.73
United Kingdom 3.28% 0.00% +3.28
Canada 3.10% 0.00% +3.10
Taiwan 3.02% 0.00% +3.02
Hong Kong SAR China 2.60% 0.00% +2.60
South Korea 2.26% 0.00% +2.26
France 1.99% 0.00% +1.99
Switzerland 1.94% 0.00% +1.94
Germany 1.84% 0.00% +1.84

What each fund did last quarter

Each fund's newest filing against its previous one. A pair whose overlap is rising or falling does so because of these moves; the figures are the same ones on each fund's page and in its feed.

FundPeriodPositionsAddedDroppedTurnoverLargest increase
VT 2026-01-31 → 2026-04-30 9,946 → 10,001 2331787.1% Broadcom Inc 1.42% → 1.73%
VTI 2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30 3,467 → 3,485 1271099.0% Micron Technology Inc 0.61% → 1.8%

Written about this pair

1

This page is the measurement. These essays argue about what it means, with the figures as they stood when each was written.

Related comparisons

8

Other pairs involving VT or VTI, ordered by how much they overlap.

PairOverlapCombined effective
ITOT vs VTI 95.07% 66.6
VOO vs VTI 88.3% 58.6
IVV vs VTI 85.64% 58.6
ITOT vs VT 58.62% 97.6
VOO vs VT 55.1% 83.7
IVV vs VT 53.19% 83.7
VTI vs VUG 52.3% 34.1
QQQ vs VTI 48.13% 49.4

Sources and limits

Computed from SEC Form N-PORT (NPORT-P), the portfolio report every registered US fund files. Positions below 0.001% of net assets are dropped; weights are normalised to each filing's own total.

Unit investment trusts including SPY and DIA do not file N-PORT, so no overlap can be computed for them. Where a comparison is missing from this site, that is usually why rather than an oversight.

Overlap says what is held in common, not what will move together. Two funds with no shared holdings can still fall together, and the effective holding count takes no account of correlation. All 275 pairs are in the concentration dataset, and every fund's own history is on its fund page.