JHEM holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 23 issuer countries.

JHEM's largest investment is SK Hynix Inc Common Stock Krw5000.0 at 7.71% of net assets. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Common Stock Krw100.0 and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufactu Common Stock Twd10.0 follow; the three together are 18.06%. Ten companies are 28.17% of the fund; the other 944 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, JHEM behaves like 67.5 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.6 times the median. Across 28 quarterly filings JHEM has become more concentrated: it behaved like 125.3 at 2019-10-31 and 67.5 at 2026-06-30. Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 10 positions were added and 7 dropped; 16.3% of the weight moved. Taiwan is the largest country at 22.97% of the portfolio, across 23 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-06-30, JHEM went from behaving like 125.3 equally weighted positions to 67.5 — 46% fewer, while its top ten went from 20.79% to 28.17% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 954 positions in JHEM's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: JHEM.csv.gz.

Share of JHEM's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of JHEM's own filings, 83 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.65 percentage points over 83 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: JHEM.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $18m was out to 8 borrowers, 1.76% of net assets. The largest, Barclays Capital Securities Ltd., held 44.8% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.22% of net assets, 12.5% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter JHEM has filed, with each borrower: JHEM.json · all funds.

950 positions became 953: 10 added (0.2% of the fund at the later date), 7 dropped (0.1% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 16.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of JHEM compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Vedanta Aluminium Metal Limited (0.09%), Nan Ya Printed Circuit Board Corporation (0.07%), Vedanta Power Limited (0.01%), Vedanta Iron and Steel Limited (0.01%), Vedanta Oil and Gas Limited (0.01%), ACM Research (Shanghai) Inc. (0.01%). Gone: AXIA Energia (0.05%), Neoenergia S.A. (0.01%), J.K. Cement Limited (0.01%), Dalmia Bharat Limited (0.01%), Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited (0.00%), TVS Motor Company Limited (0.00%).

100.0% of JHEM is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of JHEM (67.5). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.