VT holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 66.32% at a quoted market price (level 1), 46 issuer countries, 0.76% restricted securities.

VT's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 4.19% of net assets. Apple Inc and Microsoft Corp follow; the three together are 10.4%. Ten companies are 21.52% of the fund; the other 10,073 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, VT behaves like 143.6 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 3.4 times the median. Across 27 quarterly filings VT has become more concentrated: it behaved like 419.2 at 2019-10-31 and 148.7 at 2026-04-30. Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 233 positions were added and 178 dropped; 7.1% of the weight moved. the United States is the largest country at 62.59% of the portfolio, across 46 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, VT went from behaving like 419.2 equally weighted positions to 148.7 — 65% fewer, while its top ten went from 10.19% to 21.73% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

The 15 largest of 10,083 positions in VT's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: listed with the point-in-time files, available on request.

Share of VT's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of VT's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.07 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: VT.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $494m was out to 26 borrowers. The largest, J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES PLC, held 20.4% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter VT has filed, with each borrower: VT.json · all funds.

9,946 positions became 10,001: 233 added (0.6% of the fund at the later date), 178 dropped (0.6% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 7.1%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of VT compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Roche Holding AG (0.23%), Coreweave Inc (0.03%), Sunbelt Rentals Holdings Inc (0.03%), Nebius Group NV (0.03%), EchoStar Corp (0.01%), Iris Energy Ltd (0.01%). Gone: Roche Holding AG (0.26%), Ashtead Group PLC (0.03%), CyberArk Software Ltd (0.02%), Toyota Industries Corp (0.02%), Exact Sciences Corp (0.02%), Hologic Inc (0.02%).

66.3% of VT is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1); 0.0% at level 3, priced from the filer's own inputs. Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $89.90B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OBFR01 + 0% on $80M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of VT (143.6). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• 004 Expense ratio
• 003 Maximum drawdown

The same filings read aloud in under a minute. Links open YouTube; nothing from it loads on this page.

• VT reports 10058 holdings. It behaves like 148.3. 2026-09-08

• Minimum Variance vs Maximum Diversification: Two Optimizers, Two Very Different Portfolios

  Minimum variance and maximum diversification start from the same covariance matrix but optimize different things — one minimizes portfolio volatility, the...

  22 Aug 2026 9 min Long-Term Strategy

• VT vs VTI: Total World vs Total US — What Global Diversification Actually Adds

  VT is not "international" — it is roughly 60% US already, so the real choice is 100% US versus a 60/40 US/ex-US blend in one ticker. Over the trailing...

  23 Jun 2026 8 min ETF Analysis

• VXUS vs VOO: 9,336 Stocks Between Them and Exactly One in Common

  Over the past decade, VOO compounded at 15.4% annualized; VXUS at 9.7%. The 5.7-percentage-point gap is real, large, and almost entirely a story about one...

  16 Apr 2026 12 min ETF Analysis

• Is Capital Leaving the US? Global Money Flow Trends Explained

  "Capital leaving the US" describes a marginal flow story, not an exodus. The US still anchors roughly 60% of global equity market capitalization, and that...

  15 Apr 2026 12 min Macro & Markets