Fund index
VT
4 articles on this site analyse VT — 1 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-04-30VT reports 10,058 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 148.3 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 65.99% of VT is held at a quoted market price, across 47 issuer countries , with 0.8% in restricted securities. Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
27Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, VT went from behaving like 412.3 equally weighted positions to 148.3 — 64% fewer, while its top ten went from 10.22% to 21.71% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 10,058 | 148.3 | 21.71% | 4.19% |
| 2026-01-31 | 10,013 | 151.1 | 21.33% | 4.16% |
| 2025-10-31 | 9,964 | 131.3 | 22.63% | 4.58% |
| 2025-07-31 | 9,996 | 139.9 | 21.25% | 4.36% |
| 2025-04-30 | 9,818 | 180 | 18.21% | 3.61% |
| 2025-01-31 | 9,820 | 160.5 | 20.17% | 3.75% |
| 2024-10-31 | 9,861 | 163.7 | 19.07% | 3.8% |
| 2024-07-31 | 9,929 | 167.1 | 18.74% | 3.81% |
| 2024-04-30 | 9,868 | 194.1 | 17.3% | 3.69% |
| 2024-01-31 | 9,846 | 194.3 | 16.62% | 3.9% |
| 2023-10-31 | 9,706 | 197.8 | 16.29% | 3.83% |
| 2023-07-31 | 9,586 | 209.7 | 15.9% | 3.97% |
| 2023-04-30 | 9,569 | 234.9 | 14.08% | 3.73% |
| 2023-01-31 | 9,537 | 289.8 | 12.52% | 3.18% |
| 2022-10-31 | 9,570 | 250.7 | 13.8% | 3.79% |
| 2022-07-31 | 9,460 | 238.6 | 14.46% | 3.69% |
| 2022-04-30 | 9,553 | 251.5 | 13.88% | 3.54% |
| 2022-01-31 | 9,372 | 243.4 | 14.46% | 3.57% |
| 2021-10-31 | 9,312 | 261.6 | 14.31% | 3.18% |
| 2021-07-31 | 9,126 | 281.8 | 13.46% | 3.02% |
| 2021-04-30 | 9,078 | 298.3 | 13.02% | 2.84% |
| 2021-01-31 | 8,873 | 279.2 | 13.38% | 3.2% |
| 2020-10-31 | 8,843 | 267.5 | 13.81% | 3.1% |
| 2020-07-31 | 8,718 | 264.6 | 13.71% | 3.11% |
| 2020-04-30 | 8,468 | 296 | 12.73% | 2.76% |
| 2020-01-31 | 8,472 | 360.9 | 11.2% | 2.43% |
| 2019-10-31 | 8,200 | 412.3 | 10.22% | 2.07% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
1Measures applied to it
2All articles
4-
Minimum Variance vs Maximum Diversification: Two Optimizers, Two Very Different Portfolios
Minimum variance and maximum diversification start from the same covariance matrix but optimize different things — one minimizes portfolio volatility, the...
-
VT vs VTI: Total World vs Total US — What Global Diversification Actually Adds
VT is not "international" — it is roughly 60% US already, so the real choice is 100% US versus a 60/40 US/ex-US blend in one ticker. Over the trailing...
-
VXUS vs VOO: Where Should You Invest in 2026?
Over the past decade, VOO compounded at 15.4% annualized; VXUS at 9.7%. The 5.7-percentage-point gap is real, large, and almost entirely a story about one...
-
Is Capital Leaving the US? Global Money Flow Trends Explained
"Capital leaving the US" describes a marginal flow story, not an exodus. The US still anchors roughly 60% of global equity market capitalization, and that...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.