ITOT holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 99.99% at a quoted market price (level 1), 13 issuer countries.

ITOT's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 6.63% of net assets. Apple Inc and Microsoft Corp follow; the three together are 16.22%. Ten companies are 32.12% of the fund; the other 2,491 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, ITOT behaves like 66 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.6 times the median. Across 28 quarterly filings ITOT has become more concentrated: it behaved like 159.9 at 2019-09-30 and 66 at 2026-06-30. Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 64 positions were added and 55 dropped; 9.0% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, ITOT went from behaving like 159.9 equally weighted positions to 66 — 59% fewer, while its top ten went from 17.96% to 32.12% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

ITOT's filing lists 2,502 positions including 1.54% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 65 effective holdings with a top ten of 32.1%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 66 with a top ten of 32.12%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 2,501 positions in ITOT's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: listed with the point-in-time files, available on request.

Share of ITOT's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of ITOT's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.04 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: ITOT.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $1.5bn was out to 31 borrowers, 1.56% of net assets. The largest, JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, held 22% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 1.54% of net assets, 98.5% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter ITOT has filed, with each borrower: ITOT.json · all funds.

2,478 positions became 2,487: 64 added (0.6% of the fund at the later date), 55 dropped (0.5% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 9.0%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of ITOT compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (0.14%), Honeywell International, Inc. (0.10%), Honeywell Aerospace, Inc. (0.10%), Carnival Corp. Ltd. (0.05%), Sunbelt Rentals Holdings, Inc. (0.04%), DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (0.03%). Gone: Honeywell International, Inc. (0.23%), Carnival Corp. (0.05%), Coterra Energy, Inc. (0.04%), DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (0.03%), Hologic, Inc. (0.03%), Masimo Corp. (0.01%).

98.31% equity, 1.69% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $94.14B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of ITOT (66). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• 004 Turnover
• 003 Expense ratio
• 003 Factor exposure
• 003 Tracking error

The same filings read aloud in under a minute. Links open YouTube; nothing from it loads on this page.

• ITOT vs QQQ: owning both is less diversified than ITOT alone (48% overlap) 2026-10-10
• ITOT vs VUG: owning both is less diversified than ITOT alone (52% overlap) 2026-10-09
• ITOT + VOO: owning both makes you less diversified 2026-09-11
• ITOT + IVV: owning both makes you less diversified 2026-09-07

• Why 2,017 IWM Holdings Read as 33: Securities Lending in the Russell 2000 ETF

  IWM, the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, files 2,017 holdings but our concentration measure read it as 33. The cause is a 17% cash-collateral position from securities lending, flagged in the filing itself; set it aside and the fund's own investments behave like about 840. Seventy-three funds on this site, including IJH, IJR, RSP, LQD and HYG, had the same problem. What we found, what we changed today, and what is still open.

  14 Sept 2026 6 min ETF Analysis

• FCTR vs LRGF: Where AI Actually Changes the Multi-Factor Loading

  LRGF has returned 13.5% annualized over the past five years; FCTR has returned 3.0%. A 10.5-percentage-point gap that wide is structural, not noise. FCTR's...

  27 May 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• The "All-Weather" AI Portfolio: Combining Diversification with Predictive Power

  Dalio's "all-weather" idea is sound on its merits — risk-balanced exposure across four macro environments — and is implementable today with five or six...

  01 May 2026 10 min Long-Term Strategy

• The Master Guide to Evidence-Based ETF Portfolios: Using AI to Optimize Allocation (2026)

  "AI-driven portfolio optimization" mostly solves a problem long-horizon investors don't actually have. Real-time tilting at retail frequency tends to cost...

  26 Apr 2026 9 min Long-Term Strategy

• Tax-Loss Harvesting and the After-Tax Compounding Gap: What the Math Actually Shows

  Over a 30-year horizon, a 1-percentage-point reduction in annual tax drag compounds into roughly a one-third increase in terminal wealth — not because of...

  10 Mar 2026 10 min Long-Term Strategy