Fund index
ITOT
4 articles on this site analyse ITOT .
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30ITOT reports 2,502 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 65 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 99.99% of ITOT is held at a quoted market price, across 13 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
28Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, ITOT went from behaving like 138.4 equally weighted positions to 65 — 53% fewer, while its top ten went from 20.02% to 32.1% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 2,502 | 65 | 32.1% | 6.63% |
| 2026-03-31 | 2,492 | 65 | 32.21% | 6.69% |
| 2025-12-31 | 2,497 | 58 | 34.64% | 6.85% |
| 2025-09-30 | 2,489 | 57.4 | 34.56% | 7% |
| 2025-06-30 | 2,461 | 62.9 | 32.21% | 6.43% |
| 2025-03-31 | 2,453 | 72 | 29.71% | 6.15% |
| 2024-12-31 | 2,514 | 62.7 | 32.53% | 6.61% |
| 2024-09-30 | 2,549 | 68 | 30.24% | 6.33% |
| 2024-06-30 | 2,522 | 64.5 | 31.41% | 6.32% |
| 2024-03-31 | 2,513 | 79.7 | 27.82% | 6.12% |
| 2023-12-31 | 2,640 | 81.1 | 27.18% | 6.03% |
| 2023-09-30 | 2,804 | 83.7 | 27.04% | 5.98% |
| 2023-06-30 | 3,295 | 79.1 | 27.26% | 6.58% |
| 2023-03-31 | 3,331 | 90.9 | 24.67% | 6.06% |
| 2022-12-31 | 3,385 | 105.4 | 22.8% | 5.11% |
| 2022-09-30 | 3,371 | 93.4 | 25.24% | 5.82% |
| 2022-06-30 | 3,655 | 95.5 | 24.58% | 5.57% |
| 2022-03-31 | 3,660 | 92.7 | 25.37% | 5.91% |
| 2021-12-31 | 3,679 | 94.1 | 25.37% | 5.68% |
| 2021-09-30 | 3,706 | 106 | 23.9% | 4.96% |
| 2021-06-30 | 3,644 | 108.6 | 23.41% | 4.83% |
| 2021-03-31 | 3,622 | 117 | 22.22% | 4.68% |
| 2020-12-31 | 3,601 | 103.6 | 23.25% | 5.49% |
| 2020-09-30 | 3,587 | 94.6 | 24.22% | 5.53% |
| 2020-06-30 | 3,589 | 93.7 | 24.91% | 5.06% |
| 2020-03-31 | 3,641 | 94.9 | 24.84% | 4.77% |
| 2019-12-31 | 3,690 | 131.9 | 20.74% | 3.82% |
| 2019-09-30 | 3,589 | 138.4 | 20.02% | 3.58% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Measures applied to it
4All articles
4-
FCTR vs LRGF: Where AI Actually Changes the Multi-Factor Loading
LRGF has returned 13.5% annualized over the past five years; FCTR has returned 3.0%. A 10.5-percentage-point gap that wide is structural, not noise. FCTR's...
-
The "All-Weather" AI Portfolio: Combining Diversification with Predictive Power
Dalio's "all-weather" idea is sound on its merits — risk-balanced exposure across four macro environments — and is implementable today with five or six...
-
The Master Guide to Evidence-Based ETF Portfolios: Using AI to Optimize Allocation (2026)
"AI-driven portfolio optimization" mostly solves a problem long-horizon investors don't actually have. Real-time tilting at retail frequency tends to cost...
-
Tax-Loss Harvesting and the After-Tax Compounding Gap: What the Math Actually Shows
Over a 30-year horizon, a 1-percentage-point reduction in annual tax drag compounds into roughly a one-third increase in terminal wealth — not because of...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.