257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Overlap · from SEC filings

SGOV vs VXUS: what actually overlaps

SGOV and VXUS: 0% of a dollar ends up in the same companies either way (SEC Form N-PORT, 2026-05-31 and 2026-04-30), across 0 securities the two funds both hold. Every free comparison tool can list the tickers in common; this weights them, which is the part that decides whether owning both changes anything.

0%Overlap by weight
0Shared holdings
64.6Combined effective holdings
-189 vs VXUS alone

The short version

Held alone, SGOV behaves like 17.2 equally weighted positions and VXUS like 253.6. Held together in equal size they behave like 64.6 — less diversified than holding VXUS on its own — but not because the two funds overlap, since they share no securities at all. Effective holdings weights by money, and half of it now sits in SGOV, which behaves like 17.2 on its own. That is what pulls the blend down.

Overlap here is the sum, over securities both funds hold, of the smaller of the two weights: the share of a dollar that sits in the same company either way. Matching is on CUSIP. Figures are as of each fund's own reporting date (2026-05-31 and 2026-04-30), which do not always align.

Not 50/50, or holding a third fund alongside these two? The portfolio calculator runs this same math for any weights, across up to 12 funds.

Side by side

as filed
SGOVVXUS
Assets$100B$631B
Holdings235,361
Effective holdings17.2253.6
Top ten weight66.79%13.32%
Largest position9.36%4.11%
Priced at market (Level 1)0.86%12.5%
Reporting date2026-05-312026-04-30

Each fund on its own: SGOV · VXUS

What the difference is made of

100% · 98.4%

100% of SGOV sits in companies VXUS does not hold at all, and 98.4% of VXUS in companies SGOV does not hold. The largest of each, by weight in its own fund:

Only in SGOV (100%)
  • United States of America
  • United States of America
  • United States of America
  • United States of America
  • United States of America
Only in VXUS (98.4%)
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd
  • Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
  • ASML Holding NV
  • SK hynix Inc
  • Tencent Holdings Ltd

By country of issuer

2026-05-31 · 2026-04-30

Where each fund's money sits by the issuer country its filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Two funds can share companies and still differ here, and a pair that looks diversified by name can be one country twice.

CountrySGOVVXUSDifference
United States 100.00% 1.22% +98.78
Japan 0.00% 14.90% −14.90
United Kingdom 0.00% 8.69% −8.69
Canada 0.00% 8.03% −8.03
Taiwan 0.00% 7.88% −7.88
Hong Kong SAR China 0.00% 6.74% −6.74
South Korea 0.00% 5.91% −5.91
France 0.00% 5.18% −5.18
Switzerland 0.00% 5.05% −5.05
Germany 0.00% 4.78% −4.78

What each fund did last quarter

Each fund's newest filing against its previous one. A pair whose overlap is rising or falling does so because of these moves; the figures are the same ones on each fund's page and in its feed.

FundPeriodPositionsAddedDroppedTurnoverLargest increase
SGOV 2026-02-28 → 2026-05-31 23 → 23 222299.6% —
VXUS 2026-01-31 → 2026-04-30 8,614 → 8,703 2151268.4% Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 3.25% → 3.94%

Related comparisons

8

Other pairs involving SGOV or VXUS, ordered by how much they overlap.

PairOverlapCombined effective
VEA vs VXUS 71.67% 313.8
VT vs VXUS 36.77% 305.5
VWO vs VXUS 26.3% 96.7
VTV vs VXUS 0.79% 285.6
BND vs VXUS 0.73% 824.2
VIG vs VXUS 0.7% 196
AGG vs SGOV 0.42% 66.3
QQQ vs VXUS 0.42% 121.5

Sources and limits

Computed from SEC Form N-PORT (NPORT-P), the portfolio report every registered US fund files. Positions below 0.001% of net assets are dropped; weights are normalised to each filing's own total.

Unit investment trusts including SPY and DIA do not file N-PORT, so no overlap can be computed for them. Where a comparison is missing from this site, that is usually why rather than an oversight.

Overlap says what is held in common, not what will move together. Two funds with no shared holdings can still fall together, and the effective holding count takes no account of correlation. All 275 pairs are in the concentration dataset, and every fund's own history is on its fund page.