Fund index
VIG
9 articles on this site analyse VIG — 1 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-04-30VIG reports 340 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 59.8 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 99.99% of VIG is held at a quoted market price, across 2 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
27Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, VIG went from behaving like 50.9 equally weighted positions to 59.8 — 18% more, while its top ten went from 34.94% to 32.5% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 340 | 59.8 | 32.5% | 5.18% |
| 2026-01-31 | 346 | 56.9 | 33.24% | 6.27% |
| 2025-10-31 | 341 | 51.4 | 34.47% | 7.17% |
| 2025-07-31 | 340 | 56.5 | 33.01% | 6.01% |
| 2025-04-30 | 342 | 62.5 | 31.74% | 4.2% |
| 2025-01-31 | 342 | 59.3 | 32.39% | 5.35% |
| 2024-10-31 | 341 | 64.1 | 30.58% | 4.74% |
| 2024-07-31 | 343 | 65.7 | 30.14% | 4.56% |
| 2024-04-30 | 343 | 69.3 | 29.11% | 3.88% |
| 2024-01-31 | 319 | 59.8 | 32.13% | 5.53% |
| 2023-10-31 | 318 | 60.2 | 32.09% | 5.3% |
| 2023-07-31 | 319 | 62 | 31.35% | 4.83% |
| 2023-04-30 | 319 | 63 | 31.19% | 4.66% |
| 2023-01-31 | 293 | 69.3 | 28.8% | 3.77% |
| 2022-10-31 | 294 | 67.5 | 29.4% | 4.4% |
| 2022-07-31 | 293 | 67.6 | 29.23% | 4.16% |
| 2022-04-30 | 291 | 66.9 | 29.43% | 3.88% |
| 2022-01-31 | 270 | 61.3 | 31.12% | 4.72% |
| 2021-10-31 | 272 | 61.8 | 30.54% | 4.96% |
| 2021-07-31 | 252 | 61.3 | 31.43% | 4.26% |
| 2021-04-30 | 252 | 62.3 | 31.25% | 3.94% |
| 2021-01-31 | 217 | 52.5 | 35% | 4.66% |
| 2020-10-31 | 218 | 52.6 | 34.59% | 4.57% |
| 2020-07-31 | 219 | 52.2 | 35.25% | 4.58% |
| 2020-04-30 | 192 | 45.3 | 37.89% | 6.08% |
| 2020-01-31 | 190 | 49.7 | 35.34% | 5.2% |
| 2019-10-31 | 188 | 50.9 | 34.94% | 4.6% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
1Measures applied to it
7All articles
9-
DGRO vs SCHD: Two Dividend-Growth Approaches — Breadth vs Concentration
DGRO holds 400+ names with a lower 1.96% yield and a growth lean; SCHD holds roughly 100 with a 3.25% yield and a sharper value-quality tilt — same...
-
VYM vs SCHD: High Yield vs Dividend Quality — Two Different Bets on Income
VYM and SCHD both market themselves as dividend funds, but they are built on different screens — VYM ranks the broad market by forward yield; SCHD filters...
-
SCHD vs JEPI: Dividend Growth vs Covered-Call Income — Which Belongs in a Long-Term Core?
JEPI pays more than twice SCHD's yield (8.5% vs 3.3%), but over the trailing five years SCHD delivered the higher total return (8.4% vs 7.3% CAGR). JEPI's...
-
DIVZ vs SCHD vs NOBL: Three 'Quality Dividend' Approaches Compared
Three funds, three different definitions of "quality dividend": SCHD screens on financial strength plus yield, NOBL filters by 25+ years of consecutive...
-
NOBL vs. DGRW: Dividend Aristocrats vs. AI-Filtered Quality Dividend Growth
Over the past five years, DGRW returned 11.8% annualized versus NOBL's 5.7% — a 6.1-point gap, with DGRW showing slightly lower volatility and drawdown....
-
AVUV vs. SYLD: Deep Value Small-Cap vs. AI-Driven Shareholder Yield Selection
AVUV is a small-cap-value factor sleeve built on the Fama-French academic playbook. SYLD is an all-cap rules-based screen on dividends, buybacks, and debt...
-
SCHD vs. DIVZ: Traditional Dividend Growth vs. AI-Enhanced Yield Strategy
Over the trailing five years DIVZ outpaced SCHD by roughly 90 bp per year on total return, with lower realized volatility — but at roughly ten times the...
-
SCHD vs VIG: A Quantitative Analysis of Dividend Quality Factors
VIG outpaced SCHD by roughly 160 basis points per year over the trailing five years (10.3% vs 8.7% CAGR), driven by its broader sector reach and...
-
SCHD and the Power of Dividend Discipline
SCHD is not a yield product — it is a quality screen (return on equity, cash flow / debt, five-year dividend growth) that happens to express itself through...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.