FTLS holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 11 issuer countries.

FTLS's largest investment is Apple Inc at 5.89% of net assets. Nvidia Corp and Microsoft Corp follow; the three together are 12.55%. Ten companies are 31.81% of the fund; the other 174 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, FTLS behaves like 56.9 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 27 quarterly filings FTLS has held roughly steady since 2019-10-31 (78.3 then, 65.4 now). Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 129 positions were added and 150 dropped; 58.4% of the weight moved. the United States is the largest country at 84.89% of the portfolio, across 11 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, FTLS went from behaving like 78.3 equally weighted positions to 65.4 — 17% fewer, while its top ten went from 20.7% to 29.14% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 184 positions in FTLS's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: FTLS.csv.gz.

Share of FTLS's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of FTLS's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.11 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: FTLS.json · all funds.

221 positions became 200: 129 added (37.0% of the fund at the later date), 150 dropped (47.5% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 58.4%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of FTLS compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: ASML HOLDING NV (2.39%), SANDISK CORP (1.77%), ANALOG DEVICES INC (1.61%), PDD HOLDINGS INC (0.91%), GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY (0.76%), PROGRESSIVE CORP (THE) (0.73%). Gone: Tesla Inc (1.98%), Eli Lilly & Co (1.58%), Micron Technology Inc (1.21%), Lam Research Corp (1.09%), Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The (0.91%), KLA Corp (0.89%).

95.08% equity, 4.91% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $2.30B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of FTLS (56.9). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.