WCLD holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table . Pricing: 98.48% at a quoted market price (level 1), 4 issuer countries.

Ten companies are 26.52% of the fund; the other 55 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, WCLD behaves like 57 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 28 quarterly filings WCLD has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (48.8 then, 57 now).

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, WCLD went from behaving like 48.8 equally weighted positions to 57 — 17% more, while its top ten went from 24.45% to 26.52% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

WCLD's filing lists 66 positions including 1.52% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 56.2 effective holdings with a top ten of 26.53%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 57 with a top ten of 26.52%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

Share of WCLD's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of WCLD's own filings, 82 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: WCLD.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $22m was out to 6 borrowers, 9.07% of net assets. The largest, BofA Securities, Inc., held 88.1% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 1.52% of net assets, 16.8% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter WCLD has filed, with each borrower: WCLD.json · all funds.

65 positions became 65: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 12.8%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of WCLD compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

98.48% equity, 1.52% short-term investment as filed; 98.5% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of WCLD (57). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• 005 Expense ratio
• 005 Maximum drawdown
• 005 Beta
• 004 Duration
• 003 Standard deviation
• 003 Factor exposure

• ARKK vs QQQ: Disruptive Innovation vs the Nasdaq-100 — What a Full Cycle Revealed

  Over the trailing five years QQQ compounded at 15.6% annually while ARKK compounded at −8.1% — the two funds did not just diverge in degree, they diverged...

  03 Aug 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• SCHG vs VUG: Large-Cap Growth Twins — Where the Index Construction Diverges

  On the realized record, SCHG and VUG are statistically indistinguishable: a 1 basis-point fee gap, near-identical five-year volatility, and drawdowns within...

  17 Jun 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• VGT vs QQQ: Tech Sector vs Nasdaq-100 — How Different Are They Really?

  VGT is a pure GICS Information Technology sector fund; QQQ is the Nasdaq-100, a multi-sector index that excludes some of the names most people assume are...

  11 Jun 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• QQQ vs QQQM: Same Index, Different Wrapper — When the Cheaper Twin Actually Wins

  QQQ and QQQM track the identical index (the Nasdaq-100), so their return difference over five years is a rounding error — 17.2% vs 17.3% CAGR. The real...

  10 Jun 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• IGV vs WCLD vs QQQ: Breaking Down the 'Tech Beta' Stack

  IGV, WCLD, and QQQ are sold as "tech ETFs" but they are not interchangeable. QQQ is a diversified large-cap growth index, IGV is a concentrated software...

  03 Jun 2026 13 min ETF Analysis