Fund index
UPRO
7 articles on this site analyse UPRO — 1 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-05-31UPRO reports 524 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 14.3 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 70.81% of UPRO is held at a quoted market price, across 8 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
27Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-02-28, UPRO went from behaving like 75.7 equally weighted positions to 15.8 — 79% fewer, while its top ten went from 27.6% to 51.28% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-31 * | 524 | 14.3 | 51.26% | 23.92% |
| 2026-02-28 | 522 | 15.8 | 51.28% | 22.48% |
| 2025-11-30 | 527 | 32.7 | 48.93% | 8.79% |
| 2025-08-31 * | 526 | 39.4 | 44.87% | 6.68% |
| 2025-05-31 | 528 | 54.4 | 36.81% | 4.54% |
| 2025-02-28 * | 525 | 52 | 36.37% | 4.11% |
| 2024-11-30 * | 528 | 50.6 | 36.6% | 4.29% |
| 2024-08-31 * | 529 | 54.1 | 34.48% | 5.19% |
| 2024-05-31 | 524 | 47.8 | 38.78% | 7.76% |
| 2024-02-29 * | 524 | 78.6 | 30.33% | 4.17% |
| 2023-11-30 * | 525 | 73.7 | 30.18% | 4.62% |
| 2023-08-31 * | 523 | 94.4 | 24.95% | 5.06% |
| 2023-05-31 | 518 | 73.6 | 28.22% | 6.47% |
| 2023-02-28 | 523 | 40.8 | 41.75% | 6.74% |
| 2022-11-30 | 519 | 37 | 43.84% | 9.8% |
| 2022-08-31 | 516 | 20.9 | 59.76% | 11.69% |
| 2022-05-31 | 520 | 29.3 | 43.17% | 11.74% |
| 2022-02-28 | 512 | 37.8 | 41.04% | 10.11% |
| 2021-11-30 | 512 | 47.4 | 35.68% | 9.14% |
| 2021-08-31 * | 522 | 35.3 | 44.74% | 10.38% |
| 2021-05-31 * | 519 | 37.6 | 45.37% | 7.7% |
| 2021-02-28 * | 518 | 54.7 | 34.79% | 7.43% |
| 2020-11-30 * | 517 | 38.1 | 46.15% | 7.87% |
| 2020-08-31 * | 519 | 31.1 | 52.77% | 7.66% |
| 2020-05-31 | 517 | 24.1 | 50.91% | 14.56% |
| 2020-02-29 | 512 | 69.9 | 29.3% | 5.5% |
| 2019-11-30 | 526 | 75.7 | 27.6% | 7.02% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
2Measures applied to it
8All articles
7-
The Honest Math of Daily-Reset Leverage: What QLD, SSO, and TQQQ Actually Cost in a 4% Rate Regime
A 2x daily-reset ETF such as QLD does not deliver 2x the annual return of the Nasdaq-100. It delivers roughly 2x of each daily return, compounded — a...
-
Why Capital Preservation Is the Secret to Winning with Leveraged Assets
The case for capital preservation in a leveraged portfolio is not a temperament argument — it is an arithmetic one. Drawdown recovery is non-linear: a 50%...
-
What Rising Interest Rates Mean for Leveraged ETF Borrowing Costs
Leveraged ETFs do not borrow on margin. They obtain exposure through total return swaps whose financing leg is reset daily at short-term rates (Fed Funds or...
-
Leveraged ETFs vs Index ETFs: What Daily Reset Actually Costs a Long-Term Holder
Leveraged ETFs are engineered to deliver a multiple of the index's daily return, then reset every evening. Their multi-year payoff is path-dependent, not...
-
Can Leveraged ETFs Be Part of a Long-Term Portfolio? Risk Mitigation Strategies
Daily-reset leveraged ETFs are not buy-and-hold instruments. Holding-period return depends on the realized path of the underlying, not just its start and...
-
The Honest Math of Leveraged ETFs - Path Dependency, Volatility Decay, and the Behavioral Gap
Over the last five years, TQQQ delivered a 27.0% CAGR while QQQM delivered 17.6% — a ratio of 1.53x, not the 3x the leverage label implies. Realized...
-
The Honest Math of Leveraged ETFs: A 5-Year Data Read on TQQQ, SSO, and UPRO
Over the trailing five years, TQQQ delivered roughly 1.5x the realized CAGR of QQQM — not 3x — while taking on roughly 3x the drawdown and 3x the...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.