FEPI holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 98.06% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

FEPI's largest investment is Advanced Micro Devices Inc at 8.47% of net assets. Micron Technology Inc and Alphabet Inc follow; the three together are 23.52%. Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 1 positions were added and 1 dropped; 7.9% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 18 positions in FEPI's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: FEPI.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of FEPI's own filings, 33 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: FEPI.json · all funds.

16 positions became 16: 1 added (2.4% of the fund at the later date), 1 dropped (2.5% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 7.9%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of FEPI compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: United States of America (2.42%). Gone: United States of America (2.48%).

98.06% equity, 1.94% debt as filed; 98.1% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $652M. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of FEPI (14.8). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.