RING holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 77% at a quoted market price (level 1), 9 issuer countries.

RING's largest investment is Newmont Corp at 16.31% of net assets. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd and Barrick Mining Corp follow; the three together are 37.66%. Ten companies are 68.13% of the fund; the other 43 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, RING behaves like 14.5 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.9 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings RING has become less concentrated: it behaved like 11.6 at 2019-11-30 and 14.5 at 2026-05-31. Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 10 positions were added and 2 dropped; 5.5% of the weight moved. Canada is the largest country at 55.74% of the portfolio, across 9 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, RING went from behaving like 11.6 equally weighted positions to 14.5 — 25% more, while its top ten went from 70% to 68.13% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

RING's filing lists 54 positions including 1.55% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 14.5 effective holdings with a top ten of 68.01%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 14.5 with a top ten of 68.13%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 53 positions in RING's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: RING.csv.gz.

Share of RING's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of RING's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.27 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: RING.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $43m was out to 6 borrowers, 1.54% of net assets. The largest, MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC, held 47.6% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 1.55% of net assets, 100.6% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter RING has filed, with each borrower: RING.json · all funds.

43 positions became 51: 10 added (0.4% of the fund at the later date), 2 dropped (2.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 5.5%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of RING compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: WEST AFRICAN RESOURCES LTD (0.21%), INDONESIAN RUPIAH (0.09%), SOUTH AFRICAN RAND (0.06%), CANADIAN DOLLAR (0.04%), AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR (0.01%), HONG KONG DOLLAR (0.01%). Gone: New Gold Inc (1.96%), The Montreal Exchange/Bourse De Montreal (0.00%).

77.0% of RING is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $2.79B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of RING (14.5). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.