TQQQ holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 50.67% at a quoted market price (level 1), 6 issuer countries.

The largest line in TQQQ's filing is not a stock but ProShares Genius Money Market ETF, a fund position at 18.35% of net assets. Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 13 positions were added and 8 dropped; 51.1% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable derivative funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

The 15 largest of 127 positions in TQQQ's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Lines the filer classes as derivatives are included at their filed value, which is not their exposure; a swap or option line may carry a counterparty's name. The exposure itself is in the section on counterparties below. Every position, every quarter: TQQQ.csv.gz.

Share of TQQQ's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of TQQQ's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: TQQQ.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2024-11-30, $6m was out to 1 borrower, 0.02% of net assets.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter TQQQ has filed, with each borrower: TQQQ.json · all funds.

109 positions became 114: 13 added (14.9% of the fund at the later date), 8 dropped (13.4% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 51.1%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of TQQQ compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: United States of America (4.07%), United States of America (1.98%), U.S. Treasury Bills (1.85%), United States of America (1.68%), U.S. Treasury Bills (1.24%), U.S. Treasury Bills (1.23%). Gone: United States of America (5.53%), United States of America (2.49%), United States of America (1.84%), United States of America (1.66%), United States of America (1.65%), Thomson Reuters Corp. (0.14%).

50.7% of TQQQ is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $39.77B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays FEDL01 + 1.058% on $101.94B of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured derivative fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of TQQQ (19.5). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• 015 Expense ratio
• 014 Maximum drawdown
• 010 Variance drag
• 009 Total return
• 008 Duration
• 008 Standard deviation
• 006 Factor exposure
• 006 Rebalancing bands

• Fractional Kelly: A Disciplined Way to Size a High-Volatility Satellite Sleeve

  Full Kelly maximizes long-run compound growth in theory, but it assumes you know your edge exactly — a condition that essentially never holds with a...

  31 Aug 2026 9 min Long-Term Strategy

• Volatility Targeting: How Scaling Exposure to a Risk Budget Changes Long-Term Outcomes

  Volatility targeting scales exposure inversely to expected volatility so the portfolio holds a roughly constant risk budget — it works because volatility is...

  17 Aug 2026 8 min Long-Term Strategy

• The Honest Math of Daily-Reset Leverage: What QLD, SSO, and TQQQ Actually Cost in a 4% Rate Regime

  A 2x daily-reset ETF such as QLD does not deliver 2x the annual return of the Nasdaq-100. It delivers roughly 2x of each daily return, compounded — a...

  04 Apr 2026 11 min ETF Analysis

• Why Capital Preservation Is the Secret to Winning with Leveraged Assets

  The case for capital preservation in a leveraged portfolio is not a temperament argument — it is an arithmetic one. Drawdown recovery is non-linear: a 50%...

  29 Mar 2026 9 min Long-Term Strategy

• What Rising Interest Rates Mean for Leveraged ETF Borrowing Costs

  Leveraged ETFs do not borrow on margin. They obtain exposure through total return swaps whose financing leg is reset daily at short-term rates (Fed Funds or...

  28 Mar 2026 12 min Macro & Markets

• TQQQ Analysis: Is a 3x Nasdaq-100 Strategy Viable for a 30-Year Horizon?

  TQQQ's 10-year 44.9% CAGR was earned in a specific regime — near-zero financing costs, persistent Nasdaq-100 leadership, manageable realized volatility. The...

  27 Mar 2026 12 min ETF Analysis

• Leveraged ETFs vs Index ETFs: What Daily Reset Actually Costs a Long-Term Holder

  Leveraged ETFs are engineered to deliver a multiple of the index's daily return, then reset every evening. Their multi-year payoff is path-dependent, not...

  27 Mar 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• Can Leveraged ETFs Be Part of a Long-Term Portfolio? Risk Mitigation Strategies

  Daily-reset leveraged ETFs are not buy-and-hold instruments. Holding-period return depends on the realized path of the underlying, not just its start and...

  26 Mar 2026 11 min Long-Term Strategy

• The Honest Math of Leveraged ETFs - Path Dependency, Volatility Decay, and the Behavioral Gap

  Over the last five years, TQQQ delivered a 27.0% CAGR while QQQM delivered 17.6% — a ratio of 1.53x, not the 3x the leverage label implies. Realized...

  26 Mar 2026 10 min Long-Term Strategy

• The Math of Leveraged ETF Decay: Myth vs. Reality in Trending Markets

  Daily-reset leverage produces a return that, over any non-trivial horizon, is not L times the index — it is L times the daily return, compounded, then taxed...

  25 Mar 2026 9 min Long-Term Strategy

• Leveraged ETF Satellites in a Long-Term Core: The Drawdown Math Most Plans Skip

  Over the last five years, TQQQ (3x QQQ) realized a 27.0% CAGR — roughly 1.5x QQQM's 17.6%, not 3x — while drawing down 81.7% peak-to-trough. QLD (2x QQQ)...

  25 Mar 2026 8 min Long-Term Strategy

• The Honest Math of Leveraged ETFs: What Long-Horizon Investors Need to Understand Before Holding 2x or 3x

  Over the trailing five years, TQQQ compounded at 27.0% while QQQ compounded at 17.6%. A 3x daily-reset product captured roughly 1.5x of the underlying — not...

  24 Mar 2026 11 min ETF Analysis

• TQQQ vs QQQM: What Live Returns Reveal About 3x Leverage Over a Full Cycle

  Over the trailing five years, TQQQ realized only ~1.53× the CAGR of QQQM (27.0% vs 17.6%), not 3×. Daily resets, financing costs, and the 2022 drawdown...

  23 Mar 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• VOO vs QQQM vs TQQQ: What 5-Year Volatility and Drawdown Tell Us About Leverage in a Long-Term Core

  Over the trailing five years, TQQQ delivered ~27.0% annualized but with 66.6% realized volatility and an 81.7% peak-to-trough drawdown — a hole that...

  23 Mar 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• The Honest Math of Leveraged ETFs: A 5-Year Data Read on TQQQ, SSO, and UPRO

  Over the trailing five years, TQQQ delivered roughly 1.5x the realized CAGR of QQQM — not 3x — while taking on roughly 3x the drawdown and 3x the...

  22 Mar 2026 9 min Investment Framework

• Buy and Hold in 2026: What Rebalancing Discipline Actually Adds to Long-Term ETF Returns

  Buy-and-hold is still the right base case for long-horizon ETF investors, but pure drift quietly converts a balanced portfolio into something the investor...

  10 Mar 2026 10 min Long-Term Strategy

• VOO, QQQM and SCHD: One Behaves Like 52 Holdings, the Other Two Like 32 Each

  QQQM produced the highest five-year CAGR (17.6%), but at 22.3% realized volatility and a −35.0% drawdown — a single-regime number, not a permanent ranking....

  08 Mar 2026 11 min ETF Analysis

• If the Nasdaq 100 Corrects 20%, Will Long-Term Investors Lose Money? (10+ Year Analysis)

  A 20% Nasdaq-100 drawdown is the index's textbook resting state, not its tail event — the real long-term risk lives in the 50% and 80% drawdowns sitting in...

  28 Feb 2026 9 min Macro & Markets