Fund index
SMH
8 articles on this site analyse SMH — 2 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30SMH reports 26 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 13.9 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 100% of SMH is held at a quoted market price, across 4 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
28Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, SMH went from behaving like 16.5 equally weighted positions to 13.9 — 16% fewer, while its top ten went from 64.2% to 70.24% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 26 | 13.9 | 70.24% | 17.55% |
| 2026-03-31 | 26 | 12.2 | 72.19% | 19.64% |
| 2025-12-31 | 26 | 11.6 | 73.13% | 21.05% |
| 2025-09-30 | 25 | 12.5 | 72.75% | 19.28% |
| 2025-06-30 | 26 | 11.6 | 73.28% | 20.76% |
| 2025-03-31 | 25 | 12.4 | 71.66% | 19.55% |
| 2024-12-31 | 26 | 11.8 | 72.57% | 19.52% |
| 2024-09-30 | 26 | 12.2 | 71.39% | 19.76% |
| 2024-06-30 | 26 | 11.8 | 72.79% | 19.95% |
| 2024-03-31 | 26 | 11.9 | 71.94% | 20.54% |
| 2023-12-31 | 26 | 13.2 | 68.6% | 19.5% |
| 2023-09-30 | 26 | 12.2 | 72% | 19.75% |
| 2023-06-30 | 26 | 13.2 | 68.49% | 19.01% |
| 2023-03-31 | 26 | 16.1 | 64.77% | 13.66% |
| 2022-12-31 | 26 | 18.9 | 59.02% | 10.89% |
| 2022-09-30 | 26 | 18.9 | 58.35% | 11.25% |
| 2022-06-30 | 26 | 18.7 | 59.59% | 11.35% |
| 2022-03-31 | 25 | 18.8 | 59.08% | 10.53% |
| 2021-12-31 | 25 | 19.4 | 59.16% | 9.71% |
| 2021-09-30 | 26 | 14.9 | 67.53% | 15.52% |
| 2021-06-30 | 26 | 16.7 | 63.63% | 14.1% |
| 2021-03-31 | 26 | 16.5 | 63.36% | 15.23% |
| 2020-12-31 | 26 | 18.4 | 59.05% | 13.33% |
| 2020-09-30 | 26 | 19.2 | 59.19% | 11.03% |
| 2020-06-30 | 26 | 17.7 | 63.58% | 11.34% |
| 2020-03-31 | 26 | 16.8 | 64.42% | 12.38% |
| 2019-12-31 | 26 | 16.7 | 63.59% | 13.28% |
| 2019-09-30 | 31 | 16.5 | 64.2% | 12.94% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
1Measures applied to it
6All articles
8-
Minimum Variance vs Maximum Diversification: Two Optimizers, Two Very Different Portfolios
Minimum variance and maximum diversification start from the same covariance matrix but optimize different things — one minimizes portfolio volatility, the...
-
XBI vs IBB: Equal-Weight vs Cap-Weight Biotech — Two Very Different Risk Profiles
XBI weights biotech names roughly equally, tilting hard toward small- and mid-cap clinical-stage companies; IBB is cap-weighted and dominated by a handful...
-
KWEB vs FXI vs MCHI: Three Very Different Ways to Own China
These three funds share a "China" label but are not three flavors of the same trade: KWEB is an internet-sector fund, FXI is a state-heavy large-cap fund,...
-
Memory, Logic, and Equipment: What's Actually Inside a Semiconductor ETF
A semiconductor ETF is not one bet — it is a weighted basket of four different businesses (memory, logic/design, foundry, equipment) that peak and trough on...
-
The 2026 Semiconductor Selloff, Part 2 — SOXX vs SMH vs SOXQ: Which Chip ETF Actually Fits a Long-Term Portfolio
The three funds look nearly identical on realized volatility and five-year max drawdown, but SMH's 5Y CAGR beat SOXX by roughly 4.9 percentage points a year...
-
The 2026 Semiconductor Selloff: How the Most Crowded Trade Cracked, and Why Korea Fell Harder Than U.S. Chips
From their June 2026 peaks, the two large U.S. semiconductor ETFs fell hard — SOXX −15.6% and SMH −12.7% — but their long-term uptrends stayed intact, which...
-
XLV vs VHT: Two Ways to Own Healthcare — Concentration, Fees, and Defensive Behavior
XLV holds roughly 60 large-cap S&P 500 healthcare names; VHT holds around 400 across the full U.S. cap spectrum — the same sector, two different portfolios....
-
SMH vs SOXX: Two Semiconductor ETFs, Two Very Different Concentration Profiles
SMH and SOXX both track US-listed semiconductor equity, but SMH runs a far more concentrated book — the return gap over five years is mostly a concentration...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.