SMH holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 4 issuer countries.

SMH's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 17.55% of net assets. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd and Applied Materials Inc follow; the three together are 32.58%. Ten companies are 70.27% of the fund; the other 15 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, SMH behaves like 13.9 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 3.0 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings SMH has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (16.5 then, 13.9 now). the United States is the largest country at 82.09% of the portfolio, across 4 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, SMH went from behaving like 16.5 equally weighted positions to 13.9 — 16% fewer, while its top ten went from 64.21% to 70.27% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

The 15 largest of 25 positions in SMH's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: SMH.csv.gz.

Share of SMH's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of SMH's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.06 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: SMH.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $88m was out to 3 borrowers, 0.11% of net assets. The largest, BNP PARIBAS PRIME BROKERAGE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, held 97% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter SMH has filed, with each borrower: SMH.json · all funds.

25 positions became 25: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 9.9%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of SMH compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

100.00% equity as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of SMH (13.9). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• 008 Expense ratio
• 007 Maximum drawdown
• 007 Standard deviation
• 004 Duration
• 004 Beta
• 003 Factor exposure
• 003 Correlation

The same filings read aloud in under a minute. Links open YouTube; nothing from it loads on this page.

• Is SMH + SOXX more diversified than SOXX alone? No — 74% overlap 2026-09-19

• QQQ Holdings: All 105 Positions, the Top 10 at 45%, and Why It Behaves Like 34 Stocks

  What the Invesco QQQ Trust actually held on 30 June 2026, from its SEC Form N-PORT filing: 102 stocks plus three cash and futures lines, the fifty largest with weights, and the arithmetic that turns "105 holdings" into an effective count of 34. Nvidia 7.6%, Apple 6.7%, Micron 5.6%; the top ten are 45.0% and the top fifty 87.5%. Overlap with VOO, VGT, XLK and QQQM, and how the concentration has moved since 2020.

  17 Sept 2026 5 min ETF Analysis

• Berkshire Hathaway Holdings, Q2 2026: 29 Stocks That Behave Like 8.6

  The document behind every search for "Warren Buffett's portfolio" is Berkshire Hathaway's Form 13F. The one for 30 June 2026, filed 14 August, lists 29 US-listed positions worth $299.3 billion. Weighted by value they behave like 8.6 equal holdings; the top ten are 88.5%. What changed against the March filing, share by share, and what a 13F cannot tell you.

  15 Sept 2026 5 min ETF Analysis

• SOXL Holdings: What the 3x Semiconductor ETF Actually Owns

  SOXL's SEC filing lists 42 positions: 30 semiconductor stocks worth 57% of net assets, eight index swaps with a notional of $41 billion (243% of net assets), and 39% in Treasury money funds. The stocks and the swap notional add to exactly 300%. Here is what the 3x semiconductor ETF holds, where the leverage comes from, who the counterparties are, and why its holdings count cannot be read like SOXX's.

  14 Sept 2026 5 min ETF Analysis

• Minimum Variance vs Maximum Diversification: Two Optimizers, Two Very Different Portfolios

  Minimum variance and maximum diversification start from the same covariance matrix but optimize different things — one minimizes portfolio volatility, the...

  22 Aug 2026 9 min Long-Term Strategy

• XBI vs IBB: Equal-Weight vs Cap-Weight Biotech — Two Very Different Risk Profiles

  XBI weights biotech names roughly equally, tilting hard toward small- and mid-cap clinical-stage companies; IBB is cap-weighted and dominated by a handful...

  10 Aug 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• KWEB vs FXI vs MCHI: Three Very Different Ways to Own China

  These three funds share a "China" label but are not three flavors of the same trade: KWEB is an internet-sector fund, FXI is a state-heavy large-cap fund,...

  01 Aug 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• Memory, Logic, and Equipment: What's Actually Inside a Semiconductor ETF

  A semiconductor ETF is not one bet — it is a weighted basket of four different businesses (memory, logic/design, foundry, equipment) that peak and trough on...

  24 Jul 2026 8 min ETF Analysis

• The 2026 Semiconductor Selloff, Part 2 — SOXX vs SMH vs SOXQ: Which Chip ETF Actually Fits a Long-Term Portfolio

  The three funds look nearly identical on realized volatility and five-year max drawdown, but SMH's 5Y CAGR beat SOXX by roughly 4.9 percentage points a year...

  22 Jul 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• The 2026 Semiconductor Selloff: How the Most Crowded Trade Cracked, and Why Korea Fell Harder Than U.S. Chips

  From their June 2026 peaks, the two large U.S. semiconductor ETFs fell hard — SOXX −15.6% and SMH −12.7% — but their long-term uptrends stayed intact, which...

  21 Jul 2026 9 min Macro & Markets

• XLV vs VHT: Two Ways to Own Healthcare — Concentration, Fees, and Defensive Behavior

  XLV holds roughly 60 large-cap S&P 500 healthcare names; VHT holds around 400 across the full U.S. cap spectrum — the same sector, two different portfolios....

  17 Jul 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• SMH vs SOXX: Two Semiconductor ETFs, Two Very Different Concentration Profiles

  SMH and SOXX both track US-listed semiconductor equity, but SMH runs a far more concentrated book — the return gap over five years is mostly a concentration...

  12 Jun 2026 8 min ETF Analysis