SOXX holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 6 issuer countries.

SOXX's largest investment is Micron Technology Inc at 8.54% of net assets. Advanced Micro Devices Inc and Nvidia Corp follow; the three together are 23.45%. Ten companies are 61.65% of the fund; the other 22 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, SOXX behaves like 20.4 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.1 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings SOXX has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (19.8 then, 20.4 now). Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 1 positions were added and 0 dropped; 12.1% of the weight moved. the United States is the largest country at 83.88% of the portfolio, across 6 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, SOXX went from behaving like 19.8 equally weighted positions to 20.4 — 3% more, while its top ten went from 60.21% to 61.65% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

SOXX's filing lists 33 positions including 1.17% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 20.3 effective holdings with a top ten of 61.65%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 20.4 with a top ten of 61.65%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 32 positions in SOXX's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: SOXX.csv.gz.

Share of SOXX's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of SOXX's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.06 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: SOXX.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $612m was out to 8 borrowers, 1.28% of net assets. The largest, JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, held 39.6% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 1.17% of net assets, 91.4% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter SOXX has filed, with each borrower: SOXX.json · all funds.

31 positions became 32: 1 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 12.1%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of SOXX compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: N/A (0.00%).

98.75% equity, 1.25% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $47.82B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of SOXX (20.4). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• 008 Expense ratio
• 007 Maximum drawdown
• 007 Standard deviation
• 004 Duration
• 004 Beta
• 003 Factor exposure

The same filings read aloud in under a minute. Links open YouTube; nothing from it loads on this page.

• Is SMH + SOXX more diversified than SOXX alone? No — 74% overlap 2026-09-19

• SOXL Holdings: What the 3x Semiconductor ETF Actually Owns

  SOXL's SEC filing lists 42 positions: 30 semiconductor stocks worth 57% of net assets, eight index swaps with a notional of $41 billion (243% of net assets), and 39% in Treasury money funds. The stocks and the swap notional add to exactly 300%. Here is what the 3x semiconductor ETF holds, where the leverage comes from, who the counterparties are, and why its holdings count cannot be read like SOXX's.

  14 Sept 2026 5 min ETF Analysis

• Minimum Variance vs Maximum Diversification: Two Optimizers, Two Very Different Portfolios

  Minimum variance and maximum diversification start from the same covariance matrix but optimize different things — one minimizes portfolio volatility, the...

  22 Aug 2026 9 min Long-Term Strategy

• XBI vs IBB: Equal-Weight vs Cap-Weight Biotech — Two Very Different Risk Profiles

  XBI weights biotech names roughly equally, tilting hard toward small- and mid-cap clinical-stage companies; IBB is cap-weighted and dominated by a handful...

  10 Aug 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• KWEB vs FXI vs MCHI: Three Very Different Ways to Own China

  These three funds share a "China" label but are not three flavors of the same trade: KWEB is an internet-sector fund, FXI is a state-heavy large-cap fund,...

  01 Aug 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• Memory, Logic, and Equipment: What's Actually Inside a Semiconductor ETF

  A semiconductor ETF is not one bet — it is a weighted basket of four different businesses (memory, logic/design, foundry, equipment) that peak and trough on...

  24 Jul 2026 8 min ETF Analysis

• The 2026 Semiconductor Selloff, Part 2 — SOXX vs SMH vs SOXQ: Which Chip ETF Actually Fits a Long-Term Portfolio

  The three funds look nearly identical on realized volatility and five-year max drawdown, but SMH's 5Y CAGR beat SOXX by roughly 4.9 percentage points a year...

  22 Jul 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• The 2026 Semiconductor Selloff: How the Most Crowded Trade Cracked, and Why Korea Fell Harder Than U.S. Chips

  From their June 2026 peaks, the two large U.S. semiconductor ETFs fell hard — SOXX −15.6% and SMH −12.7% — but their long-term uptrends stayed intact, which...

  21 Jul 2026 9 min Macro & Markets

• XLV vs VHT: Two Ways to Own Healthcare — Concentration, Fees, and Defensive Behavior

  XLV holds roughly 60 large-cap S&P 500 healthcare names; VHT holds around 400 across the full U.S. cap spectrum — the same sector, two different portfolios....

  17 Jul 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• SMH vs SOXX: Two Semiconductor ETFs, Two Very Different Concentration Profiles

  SMH and SOXX both track US-listed semiconductor equity, but SMH runs a far more concentrated book — the return gap over five years is mostly a concentration...

  12 Jun 2026 8 min ETF Analysis