LSGR holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 95.43% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

LSGR's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 16.25% of net assets. Alphabet Inc and Tesla Inc follow; the three together are 36.37%. Ten companies are 73.33% of the fund; the other 12 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, LSGR behaves like 13.2 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 3.2 times more concentrated than the median. Across 13 quarterly filings LSGR has become more concentrated: it behaved like 16.7 at 2023-06-30 and 13.2 at 2026-06-30.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2023-06-30 and 2026-06-30, LSGR went from behaving like 16.7 equally weighted positions to 13.2 — 21% fewer, while its top ten went from 67.45% to 73.33% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 22 positions in LSGR's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: LSGR.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of LSGR's own filings, 37 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: LSGR.json · all funds.

22 positions became 22: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 6.6%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of LSGR compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

95.43% equity, 4.57% repurchase agreement as filed; 95.4% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of LSGR (13.2). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.