SOXQ holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 99.12% at a quoted market price (level 1), 6 issuer countries.

SOXQ's largest investment is Micron Technology Inc at 11.76% of net assets. Nvidia Corp and Broadcom Inc follow; the three together are 29.42%. Ten companies are 63.38% of the fund; the other 21 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, SOXQ behaves like 17.9 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.4 times more concentrated than the median. Across 20 quarterly filings SOXQ has held roughly steady since 2021-08-31 (18.6 then, 17.9 now). the United States is the largest country at 85.97% of the portfolio, across 6 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2021-08-31 and 2026-05-31, SOXQ went from behaving like 18.6 equally weighted positions to 17.9 — 4% fewer, while its top ten went from 62.67% to 63.38% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

The 15 largest of 31 positions in SOXQ's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: SOXQ.csv.gz.

Share of SOXQ's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of SOXQ's own filings, 60 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.08 percentage points over 59 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: SOXQ.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $21m was out to 1 borrower, 0.87% of net assets.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.88% of net assets, 101.5% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter SOXQ has filed, with each borrower: SOXQ.json · all funds.

31 positions became 31: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 16.9%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of SOXQ compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

99.08% equity, 0.92% short-term investment as filed; 99.1% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of SOXQ (17.9). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• The 2026 Semiconductor Selloff, Part 2 — SOXX vs SMH vs SOXQ: Which Chip ETF Actually Fits a Long-Term Portfolio

  The three funds look nearly identical on realized volatility and five-year max drawdown, but SMH's 5Y CAGR beat SOXX by roughly 4.9 percentage points a year...

  22 Jul 2026 9 min ETF Analysis