Fund index
IGV
5 articles on this site analyse IGV — 1 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30IGV reports 111 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 19.8 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 100% of IGV is held at a quoted market price, across 3 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
28Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, IGV went from behaving like 19.6 equally weighted positions to 19.8 — 1% more, while its top ten went from 63.64% to 62.91% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 111 | 19.8 | 62.91% | 10.37% |
| 2026-03-31 | 114 | 20.8 | 61.55% | 8.82% |
| 2025-12-31 | 117 | 21 | 61.94% | 8.97% |
| 2025-09-30 | 116 | 20 | 64.27% | 9.03% |
| 2025-06-30 | 119 | 20.8 | 61.5% | 9.07% |
| 2025-03-31 | 120 | 21 | 62.25% | 8.35% |
| 2024-12-31 | 124 | 20.3 | 63.47% | 8.62% |
| 2024-09-30 | 118 | 20.7 | 61.51% | 8.95% |
| 2024-06-30 | 118 | 20.3 | 62.39% | 9.68% |
| 2024-03-31 | 118 | 20.3 | 62.97% | 8.83% |
| 2023-12-31 | 119 | 20.4 | 62.85% | 8.64% |
| 2023-09-30 | 118 | 20.3 | 62.28% | 8.64% |
| 2023-06-30 | 120 | 20.8 | 61.58% | 8.97% |
| 2023-03-31 | 122 | 21.7 | 59.21% | 8.92% |
| 2022-12-31 | 123 | 20.5 | 61.77% | 8.74% |
| 2022-09-30 | 119 | 24.3 | 55.7% | 8.83% |
| 2022-06-30 | 124 | 22.4 | 59.08% | 8.88% |
| 2022-03-31 | 131 | 25.1 | 54.36% | 8.55% |
| 2021-12-31 | 131 | 25.4 | 53.37% | 8.64% |
| 2021-09-30 | 123 | 25.7 | 52.78% | 9.28% |
| 2021-06-30 | 126 | 24.9 | 55.11% | 8.82% |
| 2021-03-31 | 114 | 24.6 | 55.05% | 9.22% |
| 2020-12-31 | 115 | 26.1 | 53.53% | 8.58% |
| 2020-09-30 | 104 | 21.8 | 61.16% | 8.4% |
| 2020-06-30 | 104 | 22.1 | 60% | 8.76% |
| 2020-03-31 | 103 | 17.2 | 66.69% | 13.07% |
| 2019-12-31 | 107 | 19.2 | 63.98% | 10.37% |
| 2019-09-30 | 97 | 19.6 | 63.64% | 8.81% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
2Measures applied to it
6All articles
5-
ARKK vs QQQ: Disruptive Innovation vs the Nasdaq-100 — What a Full Cycle Revealed
Over the trailing five years QQQ compounded at 15.6% annually while ARKK compounded at −8.1% — the two funds did not just diverge in degree, they diverged...
-
SCHG vs VUG: Large-Cap Growth Twins — Where the Index Construction Diverges
On the realized record, SCHG and VUG are statistically indistinguishable: a 1 basis-point fee gap, near-identical five-year volatility, and drawdowns within...
-
VGT vs QQQ: Tech Sector vs Nasdaq-100 — How Different Are They Really?
VGT is a pure GICS Information Technology sector fund; QQQ is the Nasdaq-100, a multi-sector index that excludes some of the names most people assume are...
-
QQQ vs QQQM: Same Index, Different Wrapper — When the Cheaper Twin Actually Wins
QQQ and QQQM track the identical index (the Nasdaq-100), so their return difference over five years is a rounding error — 17.2% vs 17.3% CAGR. The real...
-
IGV vs WCLD vs QQQ: Breaking Down the 'Tech Beta' Stack
IGV, WCLD, and QQQ are sold as "tech ETFs" but they are not interchangeable. QQQ is a diversified large-cap growth index, IGV is a concentrated software...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.