VUG holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

VUG's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 12.63% of net assets. Apple Inc and Microsoft Corp follow; the three together are 31.91%. Ten companies are 60.41% of the fund; the other 141 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, VUG behaves like 19.8 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.1 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings VUG has become more concentrated: it behaved like 42.6 at 2019-09-30 and 19.8 at 2026-06-30. Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 7 positions were added and 13 dropped; 10.1% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, VUG went from behaving like 42.6 equally weighted positions to 19.8 — 53% fewer, while its top ten went from 38.88% to 60.41% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

The 15 largest of 151 positions in VUG's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: VUG.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of VUG's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.04 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: VUG.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $917m was out to 22 borrowers, 0.24% of net assets. The largest, Wells Fargo Securities LLC, held 34% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.22% of net assets, 91% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter VUG has filed, with each borrower: VUG.json · all funds.

154 positions became 148: 7 added (1.7% of the fund at the later date), 13 dropped (1.1% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 10.1%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of VUG compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Intel Corp (0.79%), Corning Inc (0.30%), Space Exploration Technologies Corp (0.29%), Astera Labs Inc (0.12%), Flex Ltd (0.10%), AST SpaceMobile Inc (0.05%). Gone: Salesforce Inc (0.29%), S&P Global Inc (0.22%), T-Mobile US Inc (0.17%), Zoetis Inc (0.09%), Copart Inc (0.06%), Insulet Corp (0.04%).

99.69% equity, 0.31% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $379.29B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OBFR01 + 0% on $147M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of VUG (19.8). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• 005 Expense ratio
• 005 Maximum drawdown
• 005 Standard deviation
• 003 Duration
• 003 Factor exposure
• 003 Total return

The same filings read aloud in under a minute. Links open YouTube; nothing from it loads on this page.

• ITOT vs VUG: owning both is less diversified than ITOT alone (52% overlap) 2026-10-09
• VUG vs XLK: owning both is less diversified than VUG alone (54% overlap) 2026-10-02
• VTI vs VUG: owning both is less diversified than VTI alone (52% overlap) 2026-09-28
• Is IVV + VUG more diversified than IVV alone? No — 57% overlap 2026-09-21
• VOO + VUG: owning both makes you less diversified 2026-09-16
• QQQ + VUG: owning both makes you less diversified 2026-09-14

• QQQ Holdings: All 105 Positions, the Top 10 at 45%, and Why It Behaves Like 34 Stocks

  What the Invesco QQQ Trust actually held on 30 June 2026, from its SEC Form N-PORT filing: 102 stocks plus three cash and futures lines, the fifty largest with weights, and the arithmetic that turns "105 holdings" into an effective count of 34. Nvidia 7.6%, Apple 6.7%, Micron 5.6%; the top ten are 45.0% and the top fifty 87.5%. Overlap with VOO, VGT, XLK and QQQM, and how the concentration has moved since 2020.

  17 Sept 2026 5 min ETF Analysis

• Is Value 'Cheap'? Reading the Value Spread Instead of Guessing the Factor's Comeback

  A wide value spread tells you the price of the value trade, not its timing — it raises the odds without dating them. Over the last five years VTV and VUG...

  21 Aug 2026 10 min Macro & Markets

• VTV vs VUG: The Value-vs-Growth Split Inside the S&P 500 — What 15 Years of Data Show

  Over the trailing decade VUG compounded faster (18.1% vs 12.6% 10Y CAGR), but it did so with roughly double the realized volatility and a drawdown more than...

  16 Jul 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• SCHG vs VUG: Large-Cap Growth Twins — Where the Index Construction Diverges

  On the realized record, SCHG and VUG are statistically indistinguishable: a 1 basis-point fee gap, near-identical five-year volatility, and drawdowns within...

  17 Jun 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• TTAI Explained: Tactical Theme Rotation — Is the AI Signal Actually Repeatable?

  TTAI is not an "AI rotation" fund in any meaningful sense — it is a rules-based free-cash-flow screen on international developed-market large caps, charging...

  23 May 2026 11 min ETF Analysis

• VUG vs. TTAI: Large-Cap Growth vs. AI-Based Tactical Theme Rotation

  VUG and TTAI are not the matchup the legacy title suggests. TTAI today is the Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF — a free-cash-flow-weighted international...

  12 May 2026 9 min ETF Analysis