TGRW holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 8 issuer countries.

TGRW's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 13.89% of net assets. Alphabet Inc CL A and Apple Inc follow; the three together are 31.72%. Ten companies are 58.28% of the fund; the other 71 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, TGRW behaves like 20 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.1 times more concentrated than the median. Across 24 quarterly filings TGRW has become more concentrated: it behaved like 30.7 at 2020-09-30 and 20 at 2026-06-30. Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 14 positions were added and 3 dropped; 24.8% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2020-09-30 and 2026-06-30, TGRW went from behaving like 30.7 equally weighted positions to 20 — 35% fewer, while its top ten went from 44.22% to 58.28% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 81 positions in TGRW's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: TGRW.csv.gz.

Share of TGRW's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of TGRW's own filings, 71 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.10 percentage points over 70 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: TGRW.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $2m was out to 2 borrowers, 0.22% of net assets. The largest, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, held 99.7% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter TGRW has filed, with each borrower: TGRW.json · all funds.

70 positions became 81: 14 added (10.7% of the fund at the later date), 3 dropped (0.1% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 24.8%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of TGRW compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC (3.72%), APPLIED MATERIALS INC (1.87%), CATERPILLAR INC (1.32%), SANDISK CORP (0.80%), KLA CORP (0.76%), MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC (0.59%). Gone: WINGSTOP INC (0.06%), ARES MANAGEMENT CORP (0.03%), COUPANG INC-A (0.01%).

95.07% equity, 4.93% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of TGRW (20). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.