Fund index
SCHG
3 articles on this site analyse SCHG — 1 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-05-31SCHG reports 197 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 23.3 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 100% of SCHG is held at a quoted market price, across 5 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
27Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, SCHG went from behaving like 43.1 equally weighted positions to 23.3 — 46% fewer, while its top ten went from 39% to 57.18% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-31 | 197 | 23.3 | 57.18% | 11.01% |
| 2026-02-28 | 196 | 23.7 | 57.23% | 10.83% |
| 2025-11-30 | 196 | 23.4 | 58.05% | 10% |
| 2025-08-31 | 229 | 21.7 | 57.41% | 11.55% |
| 2025-05-31 | 228 | 23.2 | 55.76% | 10.45% |
| 2025-02-28 | 226 | 23.5 | 54.94% | 11.14% |
| 2024-11-30 | 229 | 24.1 | 53.36% | 10.57% |
| 2024-08-31 | 251 | 19.5 | 58.59% | 12.12% |
| 2024-05-31 | 250 | 19.9 | 58.27% | 12.12% |
| 2024-02-29 | 251 | 21.7 | 55.35% | 12.5% |
| 2023-11-30 | 252 | 20.6 | 55.24% | 13.05% |
| 2023-08-31 | 243 | 21 | 55.28% | 13.46% |
| 2023-05-31 | 245 | 20 | 55.08% | 13.95% |
| 2023-02-28 | 246 | 23.3 | 50.57% | 13.52% |
| 2022-11-30 | 246 | 23.1 | 50.16% | 13.59% |
| 2022-08-31 | 227 | 18.8 | 56.76% | 15.26% |
| 2022-05-31 | 228 | 19.6 | 56.36% | 14.32% |
| 2022-02-28 | 228 | 19.7 | 56.68% | 14.09% |
| 2021-11-30 | 228 | 21.1 | 56.14% | 12.64% |
| 2021-08-31 | 233 | 23 | 53.3% | 11.91% |
| 2021-05-31 | 235 | 24.6 | 51.66% | 11.19% |
| 2021-02-28 | 231 | 24.1 | 51.17% | 11.86% |
| 2020-11-30 | 227 | 23.5 | 51.34% | 12.25% |
| 2020-08-31 | 349 | 29.7 | 44.53% | 11.14% |
| 2020-05-31 | 348 | 36.6 | 41.45% | 9.06% |
| 2020-02-29 | 351 | 40 | 40.1% | 8.79% |
| 2019-11-30 | 354 | 43.1 | 39% | 8.05% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
1Measures applied to it
4All articles
3-
Is Value 'Cheap'? Reading the Value Spread Instead of Guessing the Factor's Comeback
A wide value spread tells you the price of the value trade, not its timing — it raises the odds without dating them. Over the last five years VTV and VUG...
-
VTV vs VUG: The Value-vs-Growth Split Inside the S&P 500 — What 15 Years of Data Show
Over the trailing decade VUG compounded faster (18.1% vs 12.6% 10Y CAGR), but it did so with roughly double the realized volatility and a drawdown more than...
-
SCHG vs VUG: Large-Cap Growth Twins — Where the Index Construction Diverges
On the realized record, SCHG and VUG are statistically indistinguishable: a 1 basis-point fee gap, near-identical five-year volatility, and drawdowns within...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.