VOOG holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

VOOG's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 14.26% of net assets. Microsoft Corp and Apple Inc follow; the three together are 29.92%. Ten companies are 60.1% of the fund; the other 140 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, VOOG behaves like 19.8 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.1 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings VOOG has become more concentrated: it behaved like 55 at 2019-11-30 and 19.8 at 2026-05-31. Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 8 positions were added and 1 dropped; 7.3% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, VOOG went from behaving like 55 equally weighted positions to 19.8 — 64% fewer, while its top ten went from 31.85% to 60.1% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 150 positions in VOOG's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: VOOG.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of VOOG's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.06 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: VOOG.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $3m was out to 2 borrowers, 0.01% of net assets. The largest, MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC, held 54.3% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.01% of net assets, 92.9% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter VOOG has filed, with each borrower: VOOG.json · all funds.

140 positions became 147: 8 added (1.0% of the fund at the later date), 1 dropped (0.1% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 7.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of VOOG compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Vertiv Holdings Co (0.34%), Coherent Corp (0.19%), Lumentum Holdings Inc (0.17%), Carnival Corp Ltd (0.10%), Casey's General Stores Inc (0.08%), EchoStar Corp (0.05%). Gone: Carnival Corp (0.11%).

99.86% equity, 0.14% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $26.51B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OBFR01 + 0% on $33M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of VOOG (19.8). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.