257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Fund · State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF · measured from SEC filings

XLF holdings

XLF reports 80 holdings and behaves like 20.7 equally weighted ones, computed from its SEC Form N-PORT filing for 2026-06-30. The fact sheet publishes the first number; this page computes the second, and traces it across 28 quarters of filings.

Measured concentration

as of 2026-06-30
80 Positions reported
20.7 Effective holdings
3.9× Concentration multiple
57.59% Top ten weight

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 4 issuer countries.

What stands out

as of 2026-06-30

XLF's largest investment is Berkshire Hathaway Inc at 12.08% of net assets. JPMorgan Chase & Co and Visa Inc follow; the three together are 31.13%. Ten companies are 57.59% of the fund; the other 70 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, XLF behaves like 20.7 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.0 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings XLF has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (20 then, 20.7 now).

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Every filing since 2019

28

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, XLF went from behaving like 20 equally weighted positions to 20.7 — 3% more, while its top ten went from 55.07% to 57.59% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

PeriodHoldingsEffective Top 10Largest
2026-06-30 80 20.7 57.59% 12.09%
2026-03-31 79 20.9 56.28% 12.46%
2025-12-31 77 21.3 56.19% 11.75%
2025-09-30 78 21.3 55.09% 11.92%
2025-06-30 75 20.9 55.12% 12.08%
2025-03-31 76 19.8 55.36% 13.96%
2024-12-31 75 21.7 54.09% 12.25%
2024-09-30 74 21.3 53.85% 13.38%
Earlier filings (20 more, back to 2019-09-30)
PeriodHoldingsEffectiveTop 10Largest
2024-06-30 72 21.1 54.61% 12.92%
2024-03-31 72 20.7 54.75% 13.18%
2023-12-31 73 21.7 54.21% 12.48%
2023-09-30 73 20.4 54.7% 13.86%
2023-06-30 73 20.7 55.42% 13.17%
2023-03-31 74 22 53.88% 12.53%
2022-12-31 68 20.2 53.41% 14.84%
2022-09-30 67 21.3 52.23% 14.5%
2022-06-30 67 21.5 51.68% 14.26%
2022-03-31 68 20.3 53.12% 15.17%
2021-12-31 68 21.7 52.99% 12.68%
2021-09-30 66 21.1 53.98% 12.14%
2021-06-30 66 20.6 54.77% 12.83%
2021-03-31 66 20.1 54.7% 12.78%
2020-12-31 66 20.1 53.54% 13.64%
2020-09-30 67 19 53.58% 15.63%
2020-06-30 67 20.8 52.77% 13.4%
2020-03-31 67 18.1 55.26% 15.25%
2019-12-31 67 19.1 55.75% 12.76%
2019-09-30 68 20 55.07% 12.74%

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Compared with, in the essays

1

Overlap with other funds

1

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

WithOverlapSharedCombined effective
XLF vs VFH 78.89% 70 26.7

Largest positions, as filed

as of 2026-06-30

The 15 largest of 80 positions in XLF's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: XLF.csv.gz.

#PositionWeightCumulative
1Berkshire Hathaway Inc12.09%12.1%
2JPMorgan Chase & Co11.56%23.6%
3Visa Inc7.50%31.1%
4Mastercard Inc5.46%36.6%
5Bank of America Corp4.90%41.5%
6Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The3.93%45.4%
7Wells Fargo & Co3.33%48.8%
8Morgan Stanley3.30%52.1%
9Citigroup Inc3.15%55.2%
10American Express Co2.37%57.6%
11Charles Schwab Corp/The1.99%59.6%
12Blackrock Inc1.83%61.4%
13Progressive Corp/The1.68%63.1%
14Capital One Financial Corp1.64%64.7%
15S&P Global Inc1.63%66.4%

By country of issuer

as of 2026-06-30

Share of XLF's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

CountryShare
United States 96.34%
Switzerland 1.62%
Ireland° 1.26%
Bermuda° 0.79%

Returns the fund reported

2019-07 – 2026-06

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of XLF's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

4.0%Last twelve months filed
121%Whole series, compounded
16.9%Best month
-21.4%Worst month

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.05 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: XLF.json · all funds.

Who borrows XLF's shares

2026-06-30

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $689m was out to 9 borrowers, 1.34% of net assets. The largest, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, held 91.6% of it.

BorrowerOn loanShare of the loan
BARCLAYS BANK PLC $631m 91.6%
BofA Securities, Inc. $50m 7.3%
TD SECURITIES (USA), LLC $3m 0.4%
JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC $2m 0.3%
MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC $2m 0.3%

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.11% of net assets, 8.2% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter XLF has filed, with each borrower: XLF.json · all funds.

Since the previous filing

2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30

78 positions became 78: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 3.7%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of XLF compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Largest increases2026-03-312026-06-30Largest decreases2026-03-312026-06-30
Morgan Stanley2.81%3.30% CME Group Inc1.51%1.05%
Citigroup Inc2.81%3.15% Berkshire Hathaway Inc12.46%12.09%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The3.60%3.93% Intercontinental Exchange Inc1.27%0.92%
Bank of America Corp4.59%4.90% Mastercard Inc5.77%5.46%
JPMorgan Chase & Co11.25%11.56% Charles Schwab Corp/The2.23%1.99%
Visa Inc7.21%7.50% S&P Global Inc1.85%1.63%

Asset categories and pricing

as of 2026-06-30

99.75% equity, 0.25% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Derivative exposure and counterparties

as of 2026-06-30

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $51.35B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

99.83%Stocks held directly
0%Swap notional (0)
0.13%Futures notional (1)
100%Sum, % of net assets

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Neighbours by effective holdings, equity funds

10

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of XLF (20.7). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

FundReportsBehaves likeTop tenAs of
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF 40 20.4 61.64% 2026-06-30
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF 35 20.4 57.35% 2026-05-29
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 45 20.4 * 51.9% 2026-05-31
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF 103 20.6 59.5% 2026-06-30
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF 30 20.6 61.4% 2026-06-30
EAGL Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF 28 20.9 58.54% 2026-06-30
GTOP Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF 38 21.1 55.26% 2026-05-31
CIBR First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF 43 21.2 58.04% 2026-06-30
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF 153 21.2 42.55% 2026-07-31
VAW Vanguard Materials Index Fund 111 21.2 55.5% 2026-05-31

Essays that examine XLF

1

Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.