EWW holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 98.87% at a quoted market price (level 1), 2 issuer countries.

EWW's largest investment is Grupo Mexico SAB DE CV at 14.27% of net assets. Grupo Financiero Banorte SAB DE CV and America Movil SAB DE CV follow; the three together are 31.98%. Ten companies are 63.06% of the fund; the other 32 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, EWW behaves like 17.6 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.4 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings EWW has held roughly steady since 2019-11-30 (15.9 then, 17.6 now). Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 0 positions were added and 1 dropped; 4.0% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, EWW went from behaving like 15.9 equally weighted positions to 17.6 — 11% more, while its top ten went from 63.38% to 63.06% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

EWW's filing lists 43 positions including 1.21% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 17.6 effective holdings with a top ten of 62.99%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 17.6 with a top ten of 63.06%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 42 positions in EWW's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: EWW.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of EWW's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.16 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: EWW.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $22m was out to 3 borrowers, 1.11% of net assets. The largest, GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., held 57.7% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 1.21% of net assets, 108.6% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter EWW has filed, with each borrower: EWW.json · all funds.

43 positions became 42: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 1 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 4.0%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of EWW compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Gone: MEX BOLSA IDX FUT MAR26 (0.02%).

98.9% of EWW is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $1.99B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of EWW (17.6). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.