MGK holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 99.99% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

MGK's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 13.27% of net assets. Apple Inc and Microsoft Corp follow; the three together are 32.94%. Ten companies are 63.6% of the fund; the other 49 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, MGK behaves like 17.9 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.4 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings MGK has become more concentrated: it behaved like 28.1 at 2019-11-30 and 17.9 at 2026-06-30. Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 5 positions were added and 8 dropped; 10.3% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-06-30, MGK went from behaving like 28.1 equally weighted positions to 17.9 — 36% fewer, while its top ten went from 47.72% to 63.6% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 59 positions in MGK's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: MGK.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of MGK's own filings, 82 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.05 percentage points over 82 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: MGK.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $100m was out to 10 borrowers, 0.30% of net assets. The largest, Wells Fargo Securities LLC, held 34.6% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.29% of net assets, 96.1% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter MGK has filed, with each borrower: MGK.json · all funds.

61 positions became 58: 5 added (3.7% of the fund at the later date), 8 dropped (3.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 10.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of MGK compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Applied Materials Inc (1.13%), Intel Corp (1.10%), Western Digital Corp (0.51%), Seagate Technology Holdings PLC (0.51%), Space Exploration Technologies Corp (0.48%). Gone: McDonald's Corp (0.63%), Salesforce Inc (0.51%), S&P Global Inc (0.44%), T-Mobile US Inc (0.39%), Adobe Inc (0.38%), Sherwin-Williams Co/The (0.36%).

99.44% equity, 0.55% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $33.30B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OBFR01 + 0% on $53M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of MGK (17.9). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.