Fund · Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF · measured from SEC filings
PAVE holdings
PAVE reports 100 holdings and behaves like 50.5 equally weighted ones, computed from its SEC Form N-PORT filing for 2026-05-31. The fact sheet publishes the first number; this page computes the second, and traces it across 27 quarters of filings.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-05-31Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.
What stands out
as of 2026-05-31PAVE's largest investment is Quanta Services Inc at 4.18% of net assets. CSX Corp and Eaton Corp PLC follow; the three together are 10.97%. Ten companies are 32.34% of the fund; the other 90 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, PAVE behaves like 50.5 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 27 quarterly filings PAVE has held roughly steady since 2019-11-30 (48.2 then, 50.5 now).
Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.
Every filing since 2019
27Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, PAVE went from behaving like 48.2 equally weighted positions to 50.5 — 5% more, while its top ten went from 32.73% to 32.34% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-31 | 100 | 50.5 | 32.34% | 4.18% |
| 2026-02-28 | 100 | 50.8 | 32.46% | 3.39% |
| 2025-11-30 | 99 | 50 | 32.58% | 4.39% |
| 2025-08-31 | 100 | 50.3 | 32.45% | 3.9% |
| 2025-05-31 | 101 | 49.7 | 32.55% | 4.21% |
| 2025-02-28 | 100 | 51.4 | 32.01% | 3.49% |
| 2024-11-30 | 101 | 53 | 31.99% | 3.69% |
| 2024-08-31 | 99 | 52.7 | 31.24% | 3.71% |
Earlier filings (19 more, back to 2019-11-30)
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-31 | 100 | 53.5 | 30.75% | 3.62% |
| 2024-02-29 | 99 | 52 | 30.48% | 3.25% |
| 2023-11-30 | 98 | 50 | 32.22% | 3.9% |
| 2023-08-31 | 98 | 51.8 | 31.28% | 3.82% |
| 2023-05-31 | 98 | 52.2 | 30.5% | 3.44% |
| 2023-02-28 | 98 | 53 | 30.77% | 3.44% |
| 2022-11-30 | 99 | 51.6 | 31% | 4.55% |
| 2022-08-31 | 99 | 52 | 30.63% | 4.38% |
| 2022-05-31 | 99 | 52.6 | 30.53% | 4.35% |
| 2022-02-28 | 100 | 53.5 | 30.34% | 4.15% |
| 2021-11-30 | 99 | 52.1 | 30.33% | 3.51% |
| 2021-08-31 | 98 | 51.3 | 31% | 3.87% |
| 2021-05-31 | 99 | 52.7 | 29.99% | 3.45% |
| 2021-02-28 | 101 | 53.3 | 29.95% | 3.33% |
| 2020-11-30 | 94 | 48 | 32.66% | 3.82% |
| 2020-08-31 | 93 | 45.3 | 34.44% | 4.31% |
| 2020-05-31 | 94 | 45.9 | 33.82% | 4.18% |
| 2020-02-29 | 94 | 48.4 | 31.42% | 3.4% |
| 2019-11-30 | 93 | 48.2 | 32.73% | 3.77% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Compared with, in the essays
4Overlap with other funds
4Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.
| With | Overlap | Shared | Combined effective |
|---|---|---|---|
| PAVE vs IFRA | 34.03% | 50 | 75.4 |
| PAVE vs VPU | 3.13% | 2 | 62.6 |
| PAVE vs XLU | 2.86% | 1 | 55.4 |
| PAVE vs GRID | 2.52% | 9 | 61.9 |
Largest positions, as filed
as of 2026-05-31The 15 largest of 100 positions in PAVE's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: PAVE.csv.gz.
| # | Position | Weight | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | QUANTA SERVICES, INC. | 4.18% | 4.2% |
| 2 | CSX Corporation | 3.48% | 7.7% |
| 3 | EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY | 3.30% | 11.0% |
| 4 | HOWMET AEROSPACE INC. | 3.27% | 14.2% |
| 5 | TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC | 3.19% | 17.4% |
| 6 | UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION | 3.12% | 20.5% |
| 7 | NUCOR CORPORATION | 3.10% | 23.6% |
| 8 | ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. | 2.92% | 26.6% |
| 9 | NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION | 2.90% | 29.5% |
| 10 | UNITED RENTALS, INC. | 2.87% | 32.3% |
| 11 | DEERE & COMPANY | 2.86% | 35.2% |
| 12 | SEMPRA | 2.86% | 38.1% |
| 13 | FASTENAL COMPANY | 2.71% | 40.8% |
| 14 | EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. | 2.64% | 43.4% |
| 15 | PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION | 2.48% | 45.9% |
Returns the fund reported
2019-09 – 2026-05Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of PAVE's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.
No compounded figure is shown. This site's two readings of PAVE's monthly returns — the filed figures and a series computed from prices — differ by a median of 3.48 percentage points over 81 months, more than distributions explain. Which is wrong cannot be told from the filings; the others in the same position are listed here.
Who borrows PAVE's shares
2026-05-31The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $12m was out to 1 borrower, 0.09% of net assets.
| Borrower | On loan | Share of the loan |
|---|---|---|
| MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC | $12m | 100.0% |
Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.09% of net assets, 102.6% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter PAVE has filed, with each borrower: PAVE.json · all funds.
Since the previous filing
2026-02-28 → 2026-05-31100 positions became 100: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 7.0%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of PAVE compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.
| Largest increases | 2026-02-28 | 2026-05-31 | Largest decreases | 2026-02-28 | 2026-05-31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUCOR CORPORATION | 2.24% | 3.10% | PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION | 3.02% | 2.48% |
| QUANTA SERVICES, INC. | 3.38% | 4.18% | DEERE & COMPANY | 3.39% | 2.86% |
| STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. | 0.73% | 1.43% | Amrize AG | 1.98% | 1.63% |
| STEEL DYNAMICS, INC. | 1.56% | 2.06% | MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. | 2.25% | 1.90% |
| UNITED RENTALS, INC. | 2.47% | 2.87% | CRH PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY | 2.71% | 2.41% |
| MASTEC, INC. | 1.30% | 1.62% | SEMPRA | 3.16% | 2.86% |
Asset categories and pricing
as of 2026-05-3199.91% equity, 0.09% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.
Neighbours by effective holdings, equity funds
10Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of PAVE (50.5). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.
| Fund | Reports | Behaves like | Top ten | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | 108 | 49.9 | 35.03% | 2026-05-31 |
| BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 507 | 49.9 | 37.08% | 2026-07-31 |
| NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 50 | 50 | 20.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 55 | 50.1 | 25.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| APUE ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF | 449 | 50.3 | 38.42% | 2026-05-31 |
| SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 750 | 50.6 | 37.28% | 2026-05-31 |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 436 | 50.6 | 36.16% | 2026-05-31 |
| AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 1,546 | 50.7 | 37.35% | 2026-05-31 |
| TSPA T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF | 329 | 50.8 | 36.33% | 2026-06-30 |
| VV Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund | 444 | 51.3 | 36.62% | 2026-06-30 |
Measures applied in the essays
8Essays that examine PAVE
8-
Top ETFs for AI Infrastructure in 2026 (Utilities, Energy, Grid)
AI capex is increasingly an electricity story. Data-center load growth has revived a previously sleepy regulated-utility sector and pulled grid-equipment...
-
Infrastructure in a 30-Year Core: What the Data on XLU and PAVE Actually Shows
"Infrastructure" is two different factor exposures wearing one label: XLU is regulated-utility income, PAVE is industrial build-out cyclicality. Treating...
-
Common Mistakes in Infrastructure Investing and How to Avoid Them
"Infrastructure" is not one asset class. XLU (regulated utilities), PAVE (industrial buildout), and GRID (smart-grid equipment) have different factor...
-
Rebalancing After an AI Concentration Run: Where the Trimmed Capital Actually Belongs
Daryanani-style threshold bands (±15% of target) reduce rebalance frequency and tax drag versus naive calendar rebalancing — but only if the chosen...
-
The Impact of 2026 Energy Policies on Your Long-Term Portfolio
Five thematic ways to express a 2026 energy-policy view — PAVE, GRID, NLR, XLU, VXUS — have produced very different 5-year returns, but the risk-adjusted...
-
Data Center REITs vs. Infrastructure ETFs: Which One for Consistent Cash Flow?
The "REITs for income, ETFs for growth" framing collapses on contact with five-year data: SRVR yields 2.6% but delivered just 0.3% annualized total return...
-
The 90/10 Allocation Framework: Pairing Broad Equity, AI Infrastructure, and a Cash Sleeve
The 90/10 template — 90% diversified equity, 10% short-duration Treasury cash — is best understood as a 100% equity policy with a rebalancing buffer, not a...
-
Infrastructure ETFs in 2026: What XLU, VPU, IFRA, PAVE, and GRID Actually Own
The "infrastructure" label hides three different factor bets: regulated utilities (XLU, VPU), broad cyclical infrastructure (IFRA), and concentrated...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.