Fund · iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF · measured from SEC filings
IFRA holdings
IFRA reports 164 holdings and behaves like 54.4 equally weighted ones, computed from its SEC Form N-PORT filing for 2026-06-30. The fact sheet publishes the first number; this page computes the second, and traces it across 28 quarters of filings.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 6 issuer countries.
What stands out
as of 2026-06-30IFRA's largest investment is Caterpillar Inc at 4.57% of net assets. Nextera Energy Inc and Union Pacific Corp follow; the three together are 12.41%. Ten companies are 32.36% of the fund; the other 154 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, IFRA behaves like 54.4 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 28 quarterly filings IFRA has become more concentrated: it behaved like 147.5 at 2019-09-30 and 54.4 at 2026-06-30. Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 3 positions were added and 5 dropped; 4.5% of the weight moved.
Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.
Every filing since 2019
28Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, IFRA went from behaving like 147.5 equally weighted positions to 54.4 — 63% fewer, while its top ten went from 7.73% to 32.36% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 164 | 54.4 | 32.36% | 4.57% |
| 2026-03-31 | 166 | 55.5 | 32.66% | 4.2% |
| 2025-12-31 | 152 | 147.4 | 7.99% | 0.84% |
| 2025-09-30 | 155 | 148.2 | 8.18% | 0.83% |
| 2025-06-30 | 157 | 151.2 | 7.89% | 0.84% |
| 2025-03-31 | 158 | 151 | 8.25% | 0.85% |
| 2024-12-31 | 161 | 152.8 | 8.11% | 0.97% |
| 2024-09-30 | 165 | 155.7 | 8.08% | 1.1% |
Earlier filings (20 more, back to 2019-09-30)
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-30 | 163 | 156.8 | 7.59% | 0.77% |
| 2024-03-31 | 167 | 158.7 | 7.9% | 0.87% |
| 2023-12-31 | 154 | 151.6 | 7.58% | 0.84% |
| 2023-09-30 | 153 | 151.1 | 7.82% | 0.94% |
| 2023-06-30 | 158 | 152.5 | 7.42% | 0.83% |
| 2023-03-31 | 161 | 151.9 | 8.3% | 1.23% |
| 2022-12-31 | 158 | 152.9 | 7.96% | 1.05% |
| 2022-09-30 | 157 | 154.2 | 7.6% | 0.81% |
| 2022-06-30 | 159 | 152.2 | 8.09% | 0.83% |
| 2022-03-31 | 160 | 154.9 | 7.56% | 0.82% |
| 2021-12-31 | 151 | 146.5 | 7.95% | 0.84% |
| 2021-09-30 | 152 | 148.1 | 8.37% | 0.94% |
| 2021-06-30 | 153 | 148.6 | 8.43% | 1.03% |
| 2021-03-31 | 154 | 149.4 | 8.14% | 0.89% |
| 2020-12-31 | 135 | 134.1 | 8.22% | 0.83% |
| 2020-09-30 | 135 | 133.7 | 8.29% | 0.86% |
| 2020-06-30 | 136 | 134.7 | 8.35% | 0.91% |
| 2020-03-31 | 146 | 132.9 | 10.1% | 1.05% |
| 2019-12-31 | 148 | 144.5 | 8.73% | 1.22% |
| 2019-09-30 | 149 | 147.5 | 7.73% | 0.85% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Compared with, in the essays
6Overlap with other funds
7Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.
| With | Overlap | Shared | Combined effective |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFRA vs VPU | 40% | 54 | 42.9 |
| IFRA vs XLU | 37.25% | 30 | 38.4 |
| IFRA vs PAVE | 34.03% | 50 | 75.4 |
| IFRA vs VOO | 4.59% | 48 | 99.8 |
| IFRA vs GRID | 4.31% | 6 | 58.5 |
| IFRA vs QQQM | 1.55% | 5 | 79.5 |
| IFRA vs SGOV | 0.05% | 1 | 52.2 |
Largest positions, as filed
as of 2026-06-30The 15 largest of 164 positions in IFRA's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: IFRA.csv.gz.
| # | Position | Weight | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CATERPILLAR INC. | 4.57% | 4.6% |
| 2 | NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. | 3.97% | 8.5% |
| 3 | UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION | 3.88% | 12.4% |
| 4 | QUANTA SERVICES, INC. | 3.77% | 16.2% |
| 5 | CSX Corporation | 3.10% | 19.3% |
| 6 | THE SOUTHERN COMPANY | 2.92% | 22.2% |
| 7 | DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION | 2.67% | 24.9% |
| 8 | CRH PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY | 2.51% | 27.4% |
| 9 | UNITED RENTALS, INC. | 2.49% | 29.9% |
| 10 | NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION | 2.48% | 32.4% |
| 11 | THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC. | 2.45% | 34.8% |
| 12 | COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC. | 2.43% | 37.2% |
| 13 | CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORPORATION. | 2.27% | 39.5% |
| 14 | AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. | 2.01% | 41.5% |
| 15 | TC Energy Corporation | 1.79% | 43.3% |
By country of issuer
as of 2026-06-30Share of IFRA's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.
| Country | Share |
|---|---|
| United States | 92.23% |
| Canada | 3.76% |
| Ireland° | 3.04% |
| Switzerland | 0.92% |
| Israel | 0.03% |
| United Kingdom | 0.02% |
Returns the fund reported
2019-07 – 2026-06Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of IFRA's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.
Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.07 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: IFRA.json · all funds.
Who borrows IFRA's shares
2026-06-30The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $38m was out to 13 borrowers, 0.81% of net assets. The largest, JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, held 30.6% of it.
| Borrower | On loan | Share of the loan |
|---|---|---|
| JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC | $12m | 30.6% |
| TD SECURITIES (USA), LLC | $7m | 18.4% |
| BNP PARIBAS PRIME BROKERAGE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | $7m | 17.4% |
| CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. | $6m | 16.7% |
| HSBC BANK PLC | $3m | 7.0% |
Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.85% of net assets, 104.4% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter IFRA has filed, with each borrower: IFRA.json · all funds.
Since the previous filing
2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30166 positions became 164: 3 added (0.1% of the fund at the later date), 5 dropped (0.1% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 4.5%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of IFRA compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.
| Largest increases | 2026-03-31 | 2026-06-30 | Largest decreases | 2026-03-31 | 2026-06-30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNITED RENTALS, INC. | 1.92% | 2.49% | CRH PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY | 2.95% | 2.51% |
| COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC. | 2.01% | 2.43% | MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. | 1.48% | 1.21% |
| STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. | 0.51% | 0.88% | CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORPORATION. | 2.54% | 2.27% |
| CATERPILLAR INC. | 4.20% | 4.57% | Amrize AG | 1.16% | 0.92% |
| QUANTA SERVICES, INC. | 3.41% | 3.77% | NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION | 2.71% | 2.49% |
| CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION | 0.80% | 1.05% | NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. | 4.12% | 3.97% |
New: TREKOR METALS LIMITED (0.09%), S P MID 400 EMINI SEP26 (0.00%), XAU UTILITIES SEP26 (0.00%). Gone: Taseko Mines Limited (0.10%), GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CORPORATION (0.05%), XAU UTILITIES JUN26 (0.00%), XAE ENERGY JUN26 (0.00%), S P MID 400 EMINI JUN26 (0.00%).
Asset categories and pricing
as of 2026-06-3099.11% equity, 0.89% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.
Derivative exposure and counterparties
as of 2026-06-30A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $4.62B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.
Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).
Neighbours by effective holdings, equity funds
10Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of IFRA (54.4). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.
| Fund | Reports | Behaves like | Top ten | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF | 260 | 53.2 | 29.22% | 2026-06-30 |
| VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund | 1,011 | 53.5 | 36.38% | 2026-05-31 |
| SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 989 | 53.5 | 36.24% | 2026-05-31 |
| APIE ActivePassive International Equity ETF | 548 | 53.5 | 23.91% | 2026-05-31 |
| XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 81 | 54.1 | 31.61% | 2026-07-31 |
| CGGE Capital Group Global Equity ETF | 115 | 54.6 | 34.07% | 2026-05-31 |
| XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 76 | 54.8 | 28.92% | 2026-07-31 |
| IYY iShares Dow Jones U.S. ETF | 967 | 54.8 | 35.04% | 2026-07-31 |
| XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 214 | 55.1 | 33.58% | 2026-07-31 |
| CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 761 | 55.2 | 35.17% | 2026-06-30 |
Measures applied in the essays
8Essays that examine IFRA
9-
Top ETFs for AI Infrastructure in 2026 (Utilities, Energy, Grid)
AI capex is increasingly an electricity story. Data-center load growth has revived a previously sleepy regulated-utility sector and pulled grid-equipment...
-
Reading 2026 Capital Flows: The Macro Arithmetic Behind the "Smart Money" Narrative
"Smart money" is mostly a narrative device. The honest version of the question is which 2026 capital flows are large and persistent enough to look...
-
VXUS vs. a US-Only Core: What International Diversification Actually Adds
Over the trailing five years VXUS underperformed VOO by roughly 540 basis points per year — and the case for holding it does not rest on that window. VXUS's...
-
Grid Modernization and the GRID ETF: A Calibrated Look at Smart-Grid Equipment vs. Utilities
GRID and XLU are often grouped as "electricity plays," but they own structurally different businesses: GRID holds the equipment makers (transformers,...
-
Utilities in a Rate-Cut Cycle: What the AI Power Demand Story Does — and Doesn't — Justify
The "AI data center demand plus rate cuts equals utility re-rating" thesis is plausible — and largely consensus. Five-year realized data show utility ETFs...
-
Infrastructure ETFs in 2026: What XLU, VPU, IFRA, PAVE, and GRID Actually Own
The "infrastructure" label hides three different factor bets: regulated utilities (XLU, VPU), broad cyclical infrastructure (IFRA), and concentrated...
-
VPU vs XLU: A Fee, Liquidity, and Concentration Comparison for Long-Horizon Utility Exposure
VPU (0.09%) and XLU (0.08%) are functionally near-identical at the top of the basket — the holdings overlap is far more important than the 1 bp fee gap....
-
VOO, XLU, IFRA: What 5-Year Data Says About Three Approaches to the AI Power Build-Out
Over five years, VOO (13.9% CAGR) beat both XLU (9.2%) and IFRA (12.8%) on raw return — the AI tailwind didn't show up in the "picks-and-shovels" trade the...
-
Sizing an AI-Infrastructure Sleeve: VOO, QQQM, XLU, IFRA, and SGOV Through a Long-Horizon Lens
The "AI infrastructure" label sits across three different ETF wrappers — utilities (XLU), industrial buildout (IFRA), and the consuming software layer...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.