Fund index
IFRA
9 articles on this site analyse IFRA — 3 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30IFRA reports 165 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 54.2 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 100% of IFRA is held at a quoted market price, across 6 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
28Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, IFRA went from behaving like 104.6 equally weighted positions to 54.2 — 48% fewer, while its top ten went from 12.27% to 32.34% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 165 | 54.2 | 32.34% | 4.57% |
| 2026-03-31 | 167 | 55.4 | 32.63% | 4.2% |
| 2025-12-31 | 153 | 139.9 | 9.14% | 1.93% |
| 2025-09-30 | 156 | 145.2 | 8.58% | 1.2% |
| 2025-06-30 | 158 | 145 | 8.83% | 1.72% |
| 2025-03-31 | 159 | 148.1 | 8.64% | 1.2% |
| 2024-12-31 | 162 | 151.4 | 8.14% | 0.97% |
| 2024-09-30 | 166 | 153.8 | 8.22% | 1.1% |
| 2024-06-30 | 164 | 155.7 | 7.6% | 0.77% |
| 2024-03-31 | 168 | 150.6 | 9.03% | 1.87% |
| 2023-12-31 | 155 | 140 | 9.23% | 2.38% |
| 2023-09-30 | 154 | 134.9 | 9.76% | 2.65% |
| 2023-06-30 | 159 | 150.3 | 7.74% | 1.04% |
| 2023-03-31 | 162 | 132.3 | 10.51% | 2.91% |
| 2022-12-31 | 159 | 134 | 10.11% | 2.85% |
| 2022-09-30 | 158 | 148.3 | 8.5% | 1.64% |
| 2022-06-30 | 160 | 142 | 9.49% | 2.2% |
| 2022-03-31 | 161 | 154.5 | 7.55% | 0.82% |
| 2021-12-31 | 152 | 142.8 | 8.51% | 1.35% |
| 2021-09-30 | 153 | 143.7 | 9.03% | 1.46% |
| 2021-06-30 | 154 | 142.6 | 9.35% | 1.71% |
| 2021-03-31 | 155 | 149.2 | 8.14% | 0.89% |
| 2020-12-31 | 136 | 133.4 | 8.23% | 0.83% |
| 2020-09-30 | 136 | 128.7 | 9.24% | 1.78% |
| 2020-06-30 | 137 | 133.4 | 8.44% | 0.91% |
| 2020-03-31 | 147 | 125.7 | 11.25% | 2.15% |
| 2019-12-31 | 149 | 114 | 12.28% | 4.31% |
| 2019-09-30 | 150 | 104.6 | 12.27% | 5.28% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
6Measures applied to it
8All articles
9-
Top ETFs for AI Infrastructure in 2026 (Utilities, Energy, Grid)
AI capex is increasingly an electricity story. Data-center load growth has revived a previously sleepy regulated-utility sector and pulled grid-equipment...
-
Reading 2026 Capital Flows: The Macro Arithmetic Behind the "Smart Money" Narrative
"Smart money" is mostly a narrative device. The honest version of the question is which 2026 capital flows are large and persistent enough to look...
-
VXUS vs. a US-Only Core: What International Diversification Actually Adds
Over the trailing five years VXUS underperformed VOO by roughly 540 basis points per year — and the case for holding it does not rest on that window. VXUS's...
-
Grid Modernization and the GRID ETF: A Calibrated Look at Smart-Grid Equipment vs. Utilities
GRID and XLU are often grouped as "electricity plays," but they own structurally different businesses: GRID holds the equipment makers (transformers,...
-
Utilities in a Rate-Cut Cycle: What the AI Power Demand Story Does — and Doesn't — Justify
The "AI data center demand plus rate cuts equals utility re-rating" thesis is plausible — and largely consensus. Five-year realized data show utility ETFs...
-
Infrastructure ETFs in 2026: What XLU, VPU, IFRA, PAVE, and GRID Actually Own
The "infrastructure" label hides three different factor bets: regulated utilities (XLU, VPU), broad cyclical infrastructure (IFRA), and concentrated...
-
VPU vs XLU: A Fee, Liquidity, and Concentration Comparison for Long-Horizon Utility Exposure
VPU (0.09%) and XLU (0.08%) are functionally near-identical at the top of the basket — the holdings overlap is far more important than the 1 bp fee gap....
-
VOO, XLU, IFRA: What 5-Year Data Says About Three Approaches to the AI Power Build-Out
Over five years, VOO (13.9% CAGR) beat both XLU (9.2%) and IFRA (12.8%) on raw return — the AI tailwind didn't show up in the "picks-and-shovels" trade the...
-
Sizing an AI-Infrastructure Sleeve: VOO, QQQM, XLU, IFRA, and SGOV Through a Long-Horizon Lens
The "AI infrastructure" label sits across three different ETF wrappers — utilities (XLU), industrial buildout (IFRA), and the consuming software layer...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.