Fund index
GRID
5 articles on this site analyse GRID — 2 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30GRID reports 123 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 22.9 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 99.19% of GRID is held at a quoted market price, across 22 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
28Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, GRID went from behaving like 20.6 equally weighted positions to 22.9 — 11% more, while its top ten went from 60.52% to 58.36% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 123 | 22.9 | 58.36% | 8.52% |
| 2026-03-31 | 122 | 24.2 | 56.49% | 8.28% |
| 2025-12-31 | 116 | 23.5 | 56.66% | 8.26% |
| 2025-09-30 | 117 | 22.9 | 57.93% | 8.59% |
| 2025-06-30 | 108 | 23.9 | 55.57% | 8.28% |
| 2025-03-31 | 108 | 23.5 | 56.68% | 8.79% |
| 2024-12-31 | 105 | 23.8 | 56.01% | 8.16% |
| 2024-09-30 | 104 | 23.1 | 57.07% | 8.27% |
| 2024-06-30 | 104 | 23.5 | 55.74% | 8.37% |
| 2024-03-31 | 104 | 24 | 56.62% | 8.23% |
| 2023-12-31 | 103 | 23.9 | 57.02% | 8.18% |
| 2023-09-29 | 102 | 23.9 | 56.62% | 8.23% |
| 2023-06-30 | 86 | 22.2 | 58.53% | 8.48% |
| 2023-03-31 | 87 | 22.7 | 58.61% | 8.23% |
| 2022-12-30 | 84 | 21.8 | 59.37% | 8.27% |
| 2022-09-30 | 83 | 21.3 | 60.11% | 8.7% |
| 2022-06-30 | 80 | 21.5 | 60.13% | 8.03% |
| 2022-03-31 | 81 | 21.4 | 59.63% | 8.27% |
| 2021-12-31 | 74 | 20.4 | 61.75% | 8.66% |
| 2021-09-30 | 73 | 21.5 | 59.33% | 8.34% |
| 2021-06-30 | 71 | 20.5 | 60.73% | 8.11% |
| 2021-03-31 | 71 | 21.1 | 59.94% | 8.39% |
| 2020-12-31 | 64 | 21.7 | 59.74% | 8.21% |
| 2020-09-30 | 64 | 20.9 | 61.04% | 8.48% |
| 2020-06-30 | 59 | 17.1 | 66.4% | 9.91% |
| 2020-03-31 | 57 | 19.6 | 62.03% | 9.54% |
| 2019-12-31 | 58 | 19.1 | 62.88% | 8.11% |
| 2019-09-30 | 58 | 20.6 | 60.52% | 8.13% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
4Measures applied to it
7All articles
5-
Common Mistakes in Infrastructure Investing and How to Avoid Them
"Infrastructure" is not one asset class. XLU (regulated utilities), PAVE (industrial buildout), and GRID (smart-grid equipment) have different factor...
-
The Impact of 2026 Energy Policies on Your Long-Term Portfolio
Five thematic ways to express a 2026 energy-policy view — PAVE, GRID, NLR, XLU, VXUS — have produced very different 5-year returns, but the risk-adjusted...
-
Data Center REITs vs. Infrastructure ETFs: Which One for Consistent Cash Flow?
The "REITs for income, ETFs for growth" framing collapses on contact with five-year data: SRVR yields 2.6% but delivered just 0.3% annualized total return...
-
Grid Modernization and the GRID ETF: A Calibrated Look at Smart-Grid Equipment vs. Utilities
GRID and XLU are often grouped as "electricity plays," but they own structurally different businesses: GRID holds the equipment makers (transformers,...
-
Infrastructure ETFs in 2026: What XLU, VPU, IFRA, PAVE, and GRID Actually Own
The "infrastructure" label hides three different factor bets: regulated utilities (XLU, VPU), broad cyclical infrastructure (IFRA), and concentrated...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.