BKLC holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 12 issuer countries.

BKLC's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 7.53% of net assets. Apple Inc and Microsoft Corp follow; the three together are 18.66%. Ten companies are 37.08% of the fund; the other 497 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, BKLC behaves like 49.9 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 25 quarterly filings BKLC has held roughly steady since 2020-04-30 (60.2 then, 49.9 now). Between the 2026-01-30 and 2026-04-30 filings 9 positions were added and 12 dropped; 6.0% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2020-04-30 and 2026-04-30, BKLC went from behaving like 60.2 equally weighted positions to 49.9 — 17% fewer, while its top ten went from 30.28% to 37.93% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 507 positions in BKLC's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: BKLC.csv.gz.

Share of BKLC's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of BKLC's own filings, 73 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.11 percentage points over 72 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: BKLC.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $30m was out to 6 borrowers. The largest, BofA Securities, Inc., held 56.9% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter BKLC has filed, with each borrower: BKLC.json · all funds.

508 positions became 505: 9 added (0.6% of the fund at the later date), 12 dropped (0.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 6.0%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of BKLC compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: SANDISK CORP (0.24%), LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC (0.10%), BLOOM ENERGY CORP (0.10%), COHERENT CORP (0.07%), FTAI AVIATION LTD (0.04%), KEYCORP (0.03%). Gone: Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Money Market Fund (0.09%), CF Industries Holdings Inc (0.03%), Hologic Inc (0.03%), Clorox Co/The (0.02%), Regency Centers Corp (0.02%), Builders FirstSource Inc (0.02%).

99.96% equity, 0.04% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $5.26B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of BKLC (49.9). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.