Fund index
NOBL
4 articles on this site analyse NOBL — 2 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-05-31NOBL reports 74 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 68.9 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 99.96% of NOBL is held at a quoted market price, across 4 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
27Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, NOBL went from behaving like 57.1 equally weighted positions to 68.9 — 21% more, while its top ten went from 18.83% to 16.54% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-31 | 74 | 68.9 | 16.54% | 1.76% |
| 2026-02-28 | 79 | 68.7 | 16% | 1.64% |
| 2025-11-30 | 79 | 68.8 | 16.97% | 2.02% |
| 2025-08-31 | 76 | 69 | 15.88% | 1.8% |
| 2025-05-31 | 78 | 69 | 16.02% | 1.66% |
| 2025-02-28 | 76 | 68.8 | 16.1% | 1.74% |
| 2024-11-30 | 72 | 66 | 16.69% | 1.81% |
| 2024-08-31 | 74 | 66 | 16.54% | 1.72% |
| 2024-05-31 | 72 | 66.9 | 16.68% | 1.83% |
| 2024-02-29 | 72 | 67.1 | 16.26% | 1.67% |
| 2023-11-30 | 74 | 67.2 | 16.48% | 1.73% |
| 2023-08-31 | 73 | 66.3 | 16.41% | 1.68% |
| 2023-05-31 | 71 | 66.1 | 16.46% | 1.77% |
| 2023-02-28 | 73 | 67 | 16.81% | 1.86% |
| 2022-11-30 | 69 | 64.1 | 17.01% | 1.78% |
| 2022-08-31 | 72 | 63.8 | 17.66% | 1.93% |
| 2022-05-31 | 72 | 63.8 | 17.66% | 2.09% |
| 2022-02-28 | 69 | 64.9 | 17.84% | 2.17% |
| 2021-11-30 | 68 | 65.2 | 16.92% | 1.84% |
| 2021-08-31 | 70 | 65 | 17.13% | 1.87% |
| 2021-05-31 | 69 | 65 | 16.91% | 1.98% |
| 2021-02-28 | 70 | 65 | 17.23% | 1.96% |
| 2020-11-30 | 70 | 64.9 | 17.48% | 2.06% |
| 2020-08-31 | 69 | 65.1 | 16.67% | 1.81% |
| 2020-05-31 | 70 | 65.8 | 17.29% | 1.89% |
| 2020-02-29 | 69 | 64.2 | 17.02% | 1.8% |
| 2019-11-30 | 64 | 57.1 | 18.83% | 2% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
2Measures applied to it
4All articles
4-
DGRO vs SCHD: Two Dividend-Growth Approaches — Breadth vs Concentration
DGRO holds 400+ names with a lower 1.96% yield and a growth lean; SCHD holds roughly 100 with a 3.25% yield and a sharper value-quality tilt — same...
-
VYM vs SCHD: High Yield vs Dividend Quality — Two Different Bets on Income
VYM and SCHD both market themselves as dividend funds, but they are built on different screens — VYM ranks the broad market by forward yield; SCHD filters...
-
DIVZ vs SCHD vs NOBL: Three 'Quality Dividend' Approaches Compared
Three funds, three different definitions of "quality dividend": SCHD screens on financial strength plus yield, NOBL filters by 25+ years of consecutive...
-
NOBL vs. DGRW: Dividend Aristocrats vs. AI-Filtered Quality Dividend Growth
Over the past five years, DGRW returned 11.8% annualized versus NOBL's 5.7% — a 6.1-point gap, with DGRW showing slightly lower volatility and drawdown....
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.