DGRW holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 99.95% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

DGRW's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 7.94% of net assets. Microsoft Corp and Apple Inc follow; the three together are 17.55%. Ten companies are 36.14% of the fund; the other 188 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, DGRW behaves like 44.1 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 28 quarterly filings DGRW has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (52.5 then, 44.1 now). Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 5 positions were added and 6 dropped; 11.7% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, DGRW went from behaving like 52.5 equally weighted positions to 44.1 — 16% fewer, while its top ten went from 36.27% to 36.14% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

The 15 largest of 198 positions in DGRW's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: DGRW.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of DGRW's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.06 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: DGRW.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $45m was out to 5 borrowers, 0.27% of net assets. The largest, BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC., held 36.8% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter DGRW has filed, with each borrower: DGRW.json · all funds.

199 positions became 198: 5 added (3.8% of the fund at the later date), 6 dropped (2.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 11.7%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of DGRW compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (0.99%), HALLIBURTON COMPANY (0.84%), QUALCOMM INC (0.75%), DEERE & COMPANY (0.70%), UNION PACIFIC CORP (0.50%). Gone: Abbott Laboratories (1.43%), Nucor Corporation (0.33%), W.R. Berkley Corporation (0.24%), Cincinnati Financial Corporation (0.23%), Gen Digital Inc (0.09%), Coterra Energy Inc (0.03%).

99.95% equity, 0.05% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of DGRW (44.1). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• NOBL vs. DGRW: Dividend Aristocrats vs. AI-Filtered Quality Dividend Growth

  Over the past five years, DGRW returned 11.8% annualized versus NOBL's 5.7% — a 6.1-point gap, with DGRW showing slightly lower volatility and drawdown....

  13 May 2026 10 min ETF Analysis