IUS holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 97.84% at a quoted market price (level 1), 15 issuer countries, 7.14% restricted securities.

IUS's largest investment is Alphabet Inc at 7.29% of net assets. Apple Inc and Amazon.com Inc follow; the three together are 14.69%. Ten companies are 29.54% of the fund; the other 533 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, IUS behaves like 69 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.6 times the median. Across 27 quarterly filings IUS has become more concentrated: it behaved like 100.4 at 2019-11-30 and 69 at 2026-05-31. Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 2 positions were added and 4 dropped; 9.3% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, IUS went from behaving like 100.4 equally weighted positions to 69 — 31% fewer, while its top ten went from 22.24% to 29.54% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

IUS's filing lists 545 positions including 2.2% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 67.8 effective holdings with a top ten of 29.51%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 69 with a top ten of 29.54%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 543 positions in IUS's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: IUS.csv.gz.

Share of IUS's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of IUS's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: IUS.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $19m was out to 19 borrowers, 2.16% of net assets. The largest, BNP PARIBAS PRIME BROKERAGE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, held 20.3% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 2.20% of net assets, 102% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter IUS has filed, with each borrower: IUS.json · all funds.

545 positions became 543: 2 added (0.1% of the fund at the later date), 4 dropped (0.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 9.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of IUS compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Carnival Corp. Ltd. (0.10%), Versigent PLC (0.02%). Gone: Carnival Corp. (0.13%), Coterra Energy Inc. (0.10%), Hologic, Inc. (0.05%), TEGNA Inc. (0.03%).

97.77% equity, 2.23% short-term investment as filed; 97.8% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of IUS (69). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.