Fund index
DIVZ
9 articles on this site analyse DIVZ — 2 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30DIVZ reports 30 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 26.2 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 100% of DIVZ is held at a quoted market price, across 3 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2025
5Between 2025-06-30 and 2026-06-30, DIVZ went from behaving like 26.1 equally weighted positions to 26.2 — 0% more, while its top ten went from 49.27% to 48.54% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 30 | 26.2 | 48.54% | 5.98% |
| 2026-03-31 | 29 | 25.1 | 49.93% | 6.89% |
| 2025-12-31 | 31 | 27.3 | 46.52% | 5.47% |
| 2025-09-30 | 32 | 27.6 | 46.24% | 5.57% |
| 2025-06-30 | 30 | 26.1 | 49.27% | 6.24% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
2Measures applied to it
8All articles
9-
DGRO vs SCHD: Two Dividend-Growth Approaches — Breadth vs Concentration
DGRO holds 400+ names with a lower 1.96% yield and a growth lean; SCHD holds roughly 100 with a 3.25% yield and a sharper value-quality tilt — same...
-
VYM vs SCHD: High Yield vs Dividend Quality — Two Different Bets on Income
VYM and SCHD both market themselves as dividend funds, but they are built on different screens — VYM ranks the broad market by forward yield; SCHD filters...
-
DIVZ vs SCHD vs NOBL: Three 'Quality Dividend' Approaches Compared
Three funds, three different definitions of "quality dividend": SCHD screens on financial strength plus yield, NOBL filters by 25+ years of consecutive...
-
The Ultimate 2026 Hybrid Portfolio: How to Mix Classic ETFs with AI Quant
The hybrid framework — a low-cost passive core plus a small AI-quant satellite — only earns its keep when the satellite delivers exposure the core does not....
-
AGG vs. BNDI: Total Bond Market vs. AI-Driven Active Fixed Income Strategy
AGG and BNDI hold roughly the same investment-grade bond universe in their core. The difference is one decision: BNDI writes options on top of that core to...
-
JEPI vs. AIPI: High-Yield Income vs. AI-Powered Options Overlay Strategy
JEPI pays an 8.4% distribution yield against a five-year track record (CAGR 8.2%, max drawdown -13.7%) and runs $44.0B in assets — a credible defensive...
-
SCHD vs. DIVZ: Traditional Dividend Growth vs. AI-Enhanced Yield Strategy
Over the trailing five years DIVZ outpaced SCHD by roughly 90 bp per year on total return, with lower realized volatility — but at roughly ten times the...
-
SCHD vs VIG: A Quantitative Analysis of Dividend Quality Factors
VIG outpaced SCHD by roughly 160 basis points per year over the trailing five years (10.3% vs 8.7% CAGR), driven by its broader sector reach and...
-
SCHD and the Power of Dividend Discipline
SCHD is not a yield product — it is a quality screen (return on equity, cash flow / debt, five-year dividend growth) that happens to express itself through...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.