DIVZ holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table . Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 3 issuer countries.

Ten companies are 48.57% of the fund; the other 20 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, DIVZ behaves like 26.2 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.6 times more concentrated than the median. Across 5 quarterly filings DIVZ has held roughly steady since 2025-06-30 (26 then, 26.2 now). Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 5 positions were added and 4 dropped; 19.7% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2025-06-30 and 2026-06-30, DIVZ went from behaving like 26 equally weighted positions to 26.2 — 1% more, while its top ten went from 49.34% to 48.57% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Share of DIVZ's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of DIVZ's own filings, 15 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: DIVZ.json · all funds.

29 positions became 30: 5 added (10.7% of the fund at the later date), 4 dropped (12.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 19.7%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of DIVZ compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: RTX Corp (3.07%), Union Pacific Corp (2.41%), Abbott Laboratories (1.96%), Texas Instruments Inc (1.84%), QUALCOMM Inc (1.41%). Gone: Valero Energy Corp (3.85%), Dominion Energy Inc (3.76%), Devon Energy Corp (2.38%), Lennar Corp (1.99%).

97.86% equity, 2.14% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of DIVZ (26.2). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• 009 Expense ratio
• 008 Maximum drawdown
• 008 Standard deviation
• 007 Total return
• 005 Duration
• 005 Factor exposure
• 005 Beta
• 003 Tracking error

• DGRO vs SCHD: Two Dividend-Growth Approaches — Breadth vs Concentration

  DGRO holds 400+ names with a lower 1.96% yield and a growth lean; SCHD holds roughly 100 with a 3.25% yield and a sharper value-quality tilt — same...

  05 Jul 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• VYM vs SCHD: High Yield vs Dividend Quality — Two Different Bets on Income

  VYM and SCHD both market themselves as dividend funds, but they are built on different screens — VYM ranks the broad market by forward yield; SCHD filters...

  21 Jun 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• DIVZ vs SCHD vs NOBL: Three 'Quality Dividend' Approaches Compared

  Three funds, three different definitions of "quality dividend": SCHD screens on financial strength plus yield, NOBL filters by 25+ years of consecutive...

  01 Jun 2026 11 min ETF Analysis

• The Ultimate 2026 Hybrid Portfolio: How to Mix Classic ETFs with AI Quant

  The hybrid framework — a low-cost passive core plus a small AI-quant satellite — only earns its keep when the satellite delivers exposure the core does not....

  15 May 2026 10 min Investment Framework

• AGG vs. BNDI: Total Bond Market vs. AI-Driven Active Fixed Income Strategy

  AGG and BNDI hold roughly the same investment-grade bond universe in their core. The difference is one decision: BNDI writes options on top of that core to...

  09 May 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• JEPI vs. AIPI: High-Yield Income vs. AI-Powered Options Overlay Strategy

  JEPI pays an 8.4% distribution yield against a five-year track record (CAGR 8.2%, max drawdown -13.7%) and runs $44.0B in assets — a credible defensive...

  06 May 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• SCHD vs. DIVZ: Traditional Dividend Growth vs. AI-Enhanced Yield Strategy

  Over the trailing five years DIVZ outpaced SCHD by roughly 90 bp per year on total return, with lower realized volatility — but at roughly ten times the...

  03 May 2026 11 min ETF Analysis

• SCHD vs VIG: A Quantitative Analysis of Dividend Quality Factors

  VIG outpaced SCHD by roughly 160 basis points per year over the trailing five years (10.3% vs 8.7% CAGR), driven by its broader sector reach and...

  28 Apr 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• SCHD and the Power of Dividend Discipline

  SCHD is not a yield product — it is a quality screen (return on equity, cash flow / debt, five-year dividend growth) that happens to express itself through...

  20 Feb 2026 9 min ETF Analysis