VNQ holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

VNQ's largest investment is Vang-rl Es2-ins+ at 14.63% of net assets. Welltower Inc and Prologis Inc follow; the three together are 29.47%. Ten companies are 54.95% of the fund; the other 134 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, VNQ behaves like 21.6 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.0 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings VNQ has become more concentrated: it behaved like 34.8 at 2019-10-31 and 21.6 at 2026-04-30. Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 0 positions were added and 3 dropped; 4.2% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, VNQ went from behaving like 34.8 equally weighted positions to 21.6 — 38% fewer, while its top ten went from 41.53% to 54.77% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

The 15 largest of 144 positions in VNQ's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: VNQ.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of VNQ's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.05 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: VNQ.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $214m was out to 13 borrowers. The largest, BofA Securities, Inc., held 48% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter VNQ has filed, with each borrower: VNQ.json · all funds.

151 positions became 148: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 3 dropped (0.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 4.2%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of VNQ compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Gone: PotlatchDeltic Corp (0.17%), Alexander & Baldwin Inc (0.09%), NET Lease Office Properties (0.02%).

99.43% equity, 0.57% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $69.95B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OBFR01 + 0% on $192M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of VNQ (21.6). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• 003 Expense ratio
• 003 Maximum drawdown
• 003 Duration
• 003 Total return

• VNQ vs SCHH: Two REIT Index ETFs — Holdings, Yield, and Realized Risk

  VNQ and SCHH are both broad U.S. equity REIT index funds with nearly identical realized volatility (~18.8% vs ~18.7% over five years), so the decision...

  28 Jun 2026 8 min ETF Analysis

• VNQ vs. PPTY: REITs Index vs. AI-Powered Real Estate Value Analysis

  VNQ is the cheap, deep, market-cap-weighted way to own U.S. listed real estate; PPTY is a fundamentals-tilted alternative that markets itself as smarter...

  10 May 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• Data Center REITs vs. Infrastructure ETFs: Which One for Consistent Cash Flow?

  The "REITs for income, ETFs for growth" framing collapses on contact with five-year data: SRVR yields 2.6% but delivered just 0.3% annualized total return...

  20 Mar 2026 9 min ETF Analysis