ICF holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

ICF's largest investment is Equinix Inc at 9.33% of net assets. Welltower Inc and Prologis Inc follow; the three together are 25.18%. Ten companies are 59.05% of the fund; the other 22 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, ICF behaves like 21.5 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.0 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings ICF has held roughly steady since 2019-10-31 (21.2 then, 20.5 now).

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, ICF went from behaving like 21.2 equally weighted positions to 20.5 — 3% fewer, while its top ten went from 59.18% to 60.18% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 32 positions in ICF's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: ICF.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of ICF's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.04 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: ICF.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2024-10-31, $31m was out to 2 borrowers, 1.41% of net assets. The largest, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., held 99.8% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 1.49% of net assets, 105.5% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter ICF has filed, with each borrower: ICF.json · all funds.

32 positions became 32: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 3.8%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of ICF compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

99.76% equity, 0.23% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $2.11B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of ICF (21.5). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.