257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Overlap · from SEC filings

IFRA vs QQQM: what actually overlaps

IFRA and QQQM: 1.55% of a dollar ends up in the same companies either way (SEC Form N-PORT, 2026-06-30 and 2026-05-31), across 5 securities the two funds both hold. Every free comparison tool can list the tickers in common; this weights them, which is the part that decides whether owning both changes anything.

1.55%Overlap by weight
5Shared holdings
79.5Combined effective holdings
+25.1 vs IFRA alone

The short version

Held alone, IFRA behaves like 54.4 equally weighted positions and QQQM like 32. Held together in equal size they behave like 79.5 — 25.1 more than IFRA on its own, even at 1.55% overlap.

Overlap here is the sum, over securities both funds hold, of the smaller of the two weights: the share of a dollar that sits in the same company either way. Matching is on CUSIP. Figures are as of each fund's own reporting date (2026-06-30 and 2026-05-31), which do not always align.

Not 50/50, or holding a third fund alongside these two? The portfolio calculator runs this same math for any weights, across up to 12 funds.

Side by side

as filed
IFRAQQQM
Assets$5B$97B
Holdings162103
Effective holdings54.432
Top ten weight32.36%47.43%
Largest position4.57%8.15%
Priced at market (Level 1)100%99.68%
Reporting date2026-06-302026-05-31

Each fund on its own: IFRA · QQQM

Where the overlap actually is

5

The ten shared positions that account for the most of it, with what each fund holds of its own. Shared is the lesser of the two — the part that is held in common either way. Where the two columns diverge, one fund is making a larger bet on that company than the other, and holding both does not average it away.

CompanyIFRAQQQMShared
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORPORATION. 2.274% 0.457% 0.457%
CSX Corporation 3.104% 0.369% 0.369%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. 2.011% 0.3% 0.3%
Xcel Energy Inc. 1.356% 0.217% 0.217%
EXELON CORPORATION 1.292% 0.205% 0.205%

What the difference is made of

89.96% · 98.45%

89.96% of IFRA sits in companies QQQM does not hold at all, and 98.45% of QQQM in companies IFRA does not hold. The largest of each, by weight in its own fund:

Only in IFRA (89.96%)
  • CATERPILLAR INC.
  • NEXTERA ENERGY, INC.
  • UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
  • QUANTA SERVICES, INC.
  • THE SOUTHERN COMPANY
Only in QQQM (98.45%)
  • NVIDIA Corp.
  • Apple Inc.
  • Microsoft Corp.
  • Micron Technology, Inc.
  • Amazon.com, Inc.

By country of issuer

2026-06-30 · 2026-05-31

Where each fund's money sits by the issuer country its filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Two funds can share companies and still differ here, and a pair that looks diversified by name can be one country twice.

CountryIFRAQQQMDifference
United States 92.23% 95.48% −3.25
Canada 3.76% 0.80% +2.96
Ireland° 3.04% 1.85% +1.19
Netherlands° 0.00% 1.19% −1.19
Switzerland 0.92% 0.00% +0.92
United Kingdom 0.02% 0.40% −0.38
Cayman Islands° 0.00% 0.25% −0.25
Israel 0.03% 0.00% +0.03
Not stated in filing 0.00% 0.03% −0.03

What each fund did last quarter

Each fund's newest filing against its previous one. A pair whose overlap is rising or falling does so because of these moves; the figures are the same ones on each fund's page and in its feed.

FundPeriodPositionsAddedDroppedTurnoverLargest increase
IFRA 2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30 166 → 164 354.5% UNITED RENTALS, INC. 1.92% → 2.49%
QQQM 2026-02-28 → 2026-05-31 102 → 103 4311.3% Micron Technology, Inc. 2.5% → 4.79%

Written about this pair

1

This page is the measurement. These essays argue about what it means, with the figures as they stood when each was written.

Related comparisons

8

Other pairs involving IFRA or QQQM, ordered by how much they overlap.

PairOverlapCombined effective
QQQ vs QQQM 91.56% 33.2
QQQM vs VUG 62.67% 26.4
QQQM vs XLK 55.5% 24.2
QQQM vs VOO 54.2% 42
QQQM vs VGT 53.73% 23.4
IVV vs QQQM 53.41% 42
QQQM vs VTI 47.73% 46.9
ITOT vs QQQM 47.3% 46.7

Sources and limits

Computed from SEC Form N-PORT (NPORT-P), the portfolio report every registered US fund files. Positions below 0.001% of net assets are dropped; weights are normalised to each filing's own total.

Unit investment trusts including SPY and DIA do not file N-PORT, so no overlap can be computed for them. Where a comparison is missing from this site, that is usually why rather than an oversight.

Overlap says what is held in common, not what will move together. Two funds with no shared holdings can still fall together, and the effective holding count takes no account of correlation. All 275 pairs are in the concentration dataset, and every fund's own history is on its fund page.