IYR holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

IYR's largest investment is Welltower Inc at 10.82% of net assets. Prologis Inc and Simon Property Group Inc follow; the three together are 24.31%. Ten companies are 51.4% of the fund; the other 52 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, IYR behaves like 25.8 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.6 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings IYR has become more concentrated: it behaved like 45.3 at 2019-09-30 and 25.8 at 2026-06-30.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, IYR went from behaving like 45.3 equally weighted positions to 25.8 — 43% fewer, while its top ten went from 37% to 51.4% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 62 positions in IYR's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: IYR.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of IYR's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.05 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: IYR.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $608,578 was out to 1 borrower, 0.01% of net assets.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.01% of net assets, 76.8% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter IYR has filed, with each borrower: IYR.json · all funds.

62 positions became 62: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 3.8%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of IYR compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

99.84% equity, 0.16% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $4.67B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of IYR (25.8). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• VNQ vs. PPTY: REITs Index vs. AI-Powered Real Estate Value Analysis

  VNQ is the cheap, deep, market-cap-weighted way to own U.S. listed real estate; PPTY is a fundamentals-tilted alternative that markets itself as smarter...

  10 May 2026 10 min ETF Analysis