RWR holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

RWR's largest investment is Welltower Inc at 10.57% of net assets. Prologis Inc and Simon Property Group Inc follow; the three together are 24.38%. Ten companies are 51.64% of the fund; the other 92 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, RWR behaves like 26.6 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.6 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings RWR has become more concentrated: it behaved like 34.9 at 2019-09-30 and 26.6 at 2026-06-30. Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 0 positions were added and 1 dropped; 3.3% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, RWR went from behaving like 34.9 equally weighted positions to 26.6 — 24% fewer, while its top ten went from 45.1% to 51.64% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 102 positions in RWR's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: RWR.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of RWR's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.06 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: RWR.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $28m was out to 17 borrowers, 1.50% of net assets. The largest, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, held 72.2% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.29% of net assets, 19.3% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter RWR has filed, with each borrower: RWR.json · all funds.

101 positions became 100: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 1 dropped (0.2% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 3.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of RWR compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Gone: Veris Residential Inc (0.16%).

99.21% equity, 0.79% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $1.84B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of RWR (26.6). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.