Fund index
CTA
3 articles on this site analyse CTA — 1 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30CTA reports 54 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 1.6 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 100% of CTA is held at a quoted market price, across 4 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2022
18Between 2023-12-29 and 2026-06-30, CTA went from behaving like 1.8 equally weighted positions to 1.6 — 11% fewer, while its top ten went from 96.16% to 99.48% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 54 | 1.6 | 99.48% | 79.03% |
| 2026-03-31 | 79 | 1.2 | 155.28% | 67.47% |
| 2025-12-31 | 75 | 1.2 | 103.83% | 90.76% |
| 2025-09-30 | 53 | 2.7 | 97.09% | 49.2% |
| 2025-06-30 | 30 | 4.4 | 100.32% | 34.48% |
| 2025-03-31 | 54 | 2.8 | 130.03% | 34.89% |
| 2024-12-31 | 50 | 3.4 | 97.9% | 43.73% |
| 2024-09-30 | 50 | 2.1 | 99.98% | 57.09% |
| 2024-06-28 | 31 | 1.4 | 95.27% | 84.72% |
| 2024-03-28 * | 30 | 1.4 | 93.28% | 83.02% |
| 2023-12-29 | 22 | 1.8 | 96.16% | 70.76% |
| 2023-09-29 * | 43 | 2.5 | 92.16% | 60.5% |
| 2023-06-30 * | 33 | 3.8 | 88.95% | 38.19% |
| 2023-03-31 * | 28 | 4 | 85.77% | 37.06% |
| 2022-12-30 * | 28 | 4.6 | 86.54% | 33.3% |
| 2022-09-30 * | 29 | 5.5 | 88.94% | 29.59% |
| 2022-06-30 * | 35 | 4.1 | 76.27% | 45.26% |
| 2022-03-31 * | 12 | 36897.8 | 1.39% | 0.27% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
1All articles
3-
The Real Cost of Tail-Risk Hedging: Put Options vs Cash vs Trend Following
Protective puts pay off precisely when you need them, but the continuously rolled premium is a persistent drag — the academic estimate is a few percent per...
-
DBMF vs CTA: Two Managed-Futures Trend Funds — How They Pick Trends Differently
DBMF replicates a basket of trend-following hedge funds using regression; CTA runs its own multi-model trend engine layered on a Treasury collateral base....
-
DBMF Deep Dive: How AI-Managed Futures Pick Trends Without Forecasting
DBMF doesn't forecast markets. It reverse-engineers the factor positioning of the top managed-futures hedge funds from their reported returns and replicates...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.