IWMI holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

The largest line in IWMI's filing is not a stock but Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF, a equity position at 100.38% of net assets. Ten companies are 100% of the fund; the other -8 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, IWMI behaves like 1 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 50.0 times more concentrated than the median. Across 9 quarterly filings IWMI has held roughly steady since 2024-08-31 (1 then, 1 now).

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2024-08-31 and 2026-06-30, IWMI went from behaving like 1 equally weighted positions to 1 — 0% more, while its top ten went from 100% to 100% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 2 largest of 2 positions in IWMI's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: IWMI.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of IWMI's own filings, 25 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: IWMI.json · all funds.

2 positions became 2: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 0.1%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of IWMI compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

99.25% equity, 0.75% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $1.02B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of IWMI (1). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.