BUFQ holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

The largest line in BUFQ's filing is not a stock but FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - December, a equity position at 25.44% of net assets. Ten companies are 100% of the fund; the other -5 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, BUFQ behaves like 4 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 11.1 times more concentrated than the median. Across 16 quarterly filings BUFQ has held roughly steady since 2022-08-31 (4 then, 4 now).

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2022-08-31 and 2026-05-31, BUFQ went from behaving like 4 equally weighted positions to 4 — 0% more, while its top ten went from 100% to 100% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 5 largest of 5 positions in BUFQ's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: BUFQ.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of BUFQ's own filings, 48 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: BUFQ.json · all funds.

5 positions became 5: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 1.2%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of BUFQ compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

99.93% equity, 0.07% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of BUFQ (4). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.