BNDW holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

The largest line in BNDW's filing is not a stock but Vanguard Total B, a equity position at 51.05% of net assets. Ten companies are 100% of the fund; the other -7 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, BNDW behaves like 2 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 20.0 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings BNDW has held roughly steady since 2019-11-30 (2 then, 2 now).

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, BNDW went from behaving like 2 equally weighted positions to 2 — 0% more, while its top ten went from 100% to 100% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 3 largest of 3 positions in BNDW's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: BNDW.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of BNDW's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: BNDW.json · all funds.

3 positions became 3: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 0.4%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of BNDW compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

100.00% equity as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of BNDW (2). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.