Fund index
BOTZ
4 articles on this site analyse BOTZ — 2 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-05-31BOTZ reports 63 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 20.9 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 99.88% of BOTZ is held at a quoted market price, across 11 issuer countries , with 2.48% in restricted securities. Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
27Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, BOTZ went from behaving like 19.4 equally weighted positions to 20.9 — 8% more, while its top ten went from 63.72% to 59.03% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-31 | 63 | 20.9 | 59.03% | 9.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | 51 | 18.5 | 63.84% | 10.5% |
| 2025-11-30 | 53 | 20.1 | 59.75% | 11.04% |
| 2025-08-31 | 50 | 18.6 | 63.53% | 11.66% |
| 2025-05-31 | 51 | 19.3 | 64.08% | 9.82% |
| 2025-02-28 | 47 | 17.4 | 63.57% | 12.25% |
| 2024-11-30 | 47 | 17.3 | 63.09% | 13.05% |
| 2024-08-31 | 45 | 16.5 | 67.46% | 11.95% |
| 2024-05-31 | 43 | 18.4 | 63.81% | 11.3% |
| 2024-02-29 | 47 | 12.4 | 71.19% | 20.91% |
| 2023-11-30 | 45 | 16.3 | 66.6% | 14.53% |
| 2023-08-31 | 46 | 15.8 | 66.13% | 15.21% |
| 2023-05-31 | 53 | 17.9 | 65.12% | 11.41% |
| 2023-02-28 | 47 | 17.2 | 67.38% | 10.4% |
| 2022-11-30 | 44 | 17 | 68.59% | 11.03% |
| 2022-08-31 | 43 | 3.3 | 155.96% | 21.6% |
| 2022-05-31 | 40 | 17.2 | 67.18% | 10.59% |
| 2022-02-28 | 40 | 16.2 | 68.35% | 11.13% |
| 2021-11-30 | 39 | 15.8 | 69.07% | 12.91% |
| 2021-08-31 | 37 | 17.6 | 66.72% | 8.73% |
| 2021-05-31 | 33 | 18.3 | 64.13% | 9.4% |
| 2021-02-28 | 32 | 20.4 | 60.1% | 8.11% |
| 2020-11-30 | 31 | 19.5 | 62.55% | 8.41% |
| 2020-08-31 | 31 | 18.6 | 63.57% | 9.84% |
| 2020-05-31 | 38 | 18.1 | 64.16% | 12.76% |
| 2020-02-29 | 38 | 19.7 | 61.61% | 10.92% |
| 2019-11-30 | 36 | 19.4 | 63.72% | 8.99% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
2Measures applied to it
6All articles
4-
BOTZ vs. ROBO vs. AIQ: Three AI & Robotics ETFs Compared
The three funds share a marketing category but not a portfolio: AIQ's 5-year CAGR of 17.2% comes mostly from mega-cap semiconductors and hyperscalers, not...
-
AIEQ vs ROBO: AI-Managed vs AI-Themed — Two Different Bets in the Same Wrapper
AIEQ and ROBO both wear "AI" branding, but they are entirely different products: AIEQ uses an AI system as the process for picking US equities; ROBO is a...
-
What SGOV and Gold Actually Do: A Quant Look at Defensive Assets in 2026
SGOV's five-year realized volatility is 0.2% and its worst drawdown was 0.03% — it behaves like cash with a yield, not like a "bond." The 3.9% distribution...
-
BOTZ vs IRBO: Finding the Most Cost-Effective Entry into Automation
Over the trailing five years, IRBO's equal-weighted approach delivered an 11.1% CAGR versus BOTZ's 4.3% — a 6.8-point gap that dwarfs the 21 bp fee...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.