Fund index
ROBO
3 articles on this site analyse ROBO — 2 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-04-30ROBO reports 79 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 63.8 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 100% of ROBO is held at a quoted market price, across 14 issuer countries , with 2.42% in restricted securities. Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
27Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, ROBO went from behaving like 82.5 equally weighted positions to 63.8 — 23% fewer, while its top ten went from 16.93% to 21.08% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 79 | 63.8 | 21.08% | 4.26% |
| 2026-01-31 | 79 | 63.7 | 20.98% | 4.35% |
| 2025-10-31 | 78 | 72.7 | 19.04% | 2.3% |
| 2025-07-31 | 77 | 71.6 | 19.04% | 2.49% |
| 2025-04-30 | 75 | 70.1 | 18.37% | 2.04% |
| 2025-01-31 | 78 | 71.1 | 18.75% | 3.3% |
| 2024-10-31 | 78 | 73.7 | 17.99% | 2.18% |
| 2024-07-31 | 78 | 72.1 | 18.49% | 2% |
| 2024-04-30 | 77 | 72.8 | 17.46% | 1.95% |
| 2024-01-31 | 78 | 72.2 | 18.18% | 2.16% |
| 2023-10-31 | 79 | 73 | 17.94% | 2.11% |
| 2023-07-31 | 79 | 71.6 | 19.5% | 3.16% |
| 2023-04-30 | 79 | 73.9 | 17.5% | 2.3% |
| 2023-01-31 | 108 | 75 | 17.49% | 2.07% |
| 2022-10-31 | 82 | 74 | 18.2% | 2.25% |
| 2022-07-31 | 84 | 74.5 | 18.65% | 2.46% |
| 2022-04-30 | 82 | 75 | 17.03% | 1.85% |
| 2022-01-31 | 82 | 74.8 | 17.85% | 2.19% |
| 2021-10-31 | 83 | 75.6 | 18.19% | 2.28% |
| 2021-07-31 | 85 | 77.2 | 17.64% | 1.96% |
| 2021-04-30 | 85 | 77.9 | 16.93% | 2.02% |
| 2021-01-31 | 86 | 76.3 | 19.26% | 3.31% |
| 2020-10-31 | 86 | 80.1 | 17.2% | 1.91% |
| 2020-07-31 | 87 | 80.2 | 17.14% | 1.91% |
| 2020-04-30 | 88 | 77.9 | 18.85% | 2.09% |
| 2020-01-31 | 90 | 79.9 | 18.28% | 2.72% |
| 2019-10-31 | 91 | 82.5 | 16.93% | 1.81% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
2Measures applied to it
4All articles
3-
URA vs URNM vs NLR: Uranium Miners vs Nuclear Utilities — Two Bets on the Same Thesis
URA and URNM express the uranium thesis through mining equity; NLR blends miners with nuclear utilities and fuel-cycle names, and that structural difference...
-
BOTZ vs. ROBO vs. AIQ: Three AI & Robotics ETFs Compared
The three funds share a marketing category but not a portfolio: AIQ's 5-year CAGR of 17.2% comes mostly from mega-cap semiconductors and hyperscalers, not...
-
AIEQ vs ROBO: AI-Managed vs AI-Themed — Two Different Bets in the Same Wrapper
AIEQ and ROBO both wear "AI" branding, but they are entirely different products: AIEQ uses an AI system as the process for picking US equities; ROBO is a...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.