ROBO holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 14 issuer countries, 2.7% restricted securities.

ROBO's largest investment is Celestica Inc at 2.22% of net assets. Airtac International Group and KOH Young Technology Inc follow; the three together are 5.99%. Ten companies are 17.7% of the fund; the other 70 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, ROBO behaves like 73.7 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.7 times the median. Across 27 quarterly filings ROBO has held roughly steady since 2019-10-31 (82.2 then, 71.8 now). Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 1 positions were added and 1 dropped; 7.9% of the weight moved. the United States is the largest country at 47.14% of the portfolio, across 14 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, ROBO went from behaving like 82.2 equally weighted positions to 71.8 — 13% fewer, while its top ten went from 16.97% to 18.61% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

ROBO's filing lists 81 positions including 3.66% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 67.3 effective holdings with a top ten of 19.71%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 73.7 with a top ten of 17.7%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 80 positions in ROBO's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: ROBO.csv.gz.

Share of ROBO's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of ROBO's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

No compounded figure is shown. This site's two readings of ROBO's monthly returns — the filed figures and a series computed from prices — differ by a median of 1.94 percentage points over 81 months, more than distributions explain. Which is wrong cannot be told from the filings; the others in the same position are listed here.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $134m was out to 20 borrowers. The largest, BofA Securities, Inc., held 25.6% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter ROBO has filed, with each borrower: ROBO.json · all funds.

78 positions became 78: 1 added (1.1% of the fund at the later date), 1 dropped (1.1% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 7.9%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of ROBO compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: SoftBank Group Corp. (1.10%). Gone: MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC. (1.08%).

95.97% equity, 4.03% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of ROBO (73.7). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• 003 Expense ratio
• 003 Maximum drawdown
• 003 Standard deviation
• 003 Turnover

• URA vs URNM vs NLR: Uranium Miners vs Nuclear Utilities — Two Bets on the Same Thesis

  URA and URNM express the uranium thesis through mining equity; NLR blends miners with nuclear utilities and fuel-cycle names, and that structural difference...

  08 Aug 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• BOTZ vs. ROBO vs. AIQ: Three AI & Robotics ETFs Compared

  The three funds share a marketing category but not a portfolio: AIQ's 5-year CAGR of 17.2% comes mostly from mega-cap semiconductors and hyperscalers, not...

  30 May 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• AIEQ vs ROBO: AI-Managed vs AI-Themed — Two Different Bets in the Same Wrapper

  AIEQ and ROBO both wear "AI" branding, but they are entirely different products: AIEQ uses an AI system as the process for picking US equities; ROBO is a...

  21 May 2026 10 min ETF Analysis