CIBR holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 98.44% at a quoted market price (level 1), 8 issuer countries.

CIBR's largest investment is Palo Alto Networks Inc at 9.62% of net assets. Fortinet Inc and Crowdstrike Holdings Inc follow; the three together are 26.76%. Ten companies are 58.04% of the fund; the other 33 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, CIBR behaves like 21.2 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.0 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings CIBR has become more concentrated: it behaved like 27.4 at 2019-09-30 and 21.2 at 2026-06-30. the United States is the largest country at 86.52% of the portfolio, across 8 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, CIBR went from behaving like 27.4 equally weighted positions to 21.2 — 23% fewer, while its top ten went from 46.55% to 58.04% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

CIBR's filing lists 44 positions including 1.59% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 21.1 effective holdings with a top ten of 58.06%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 21.2 with a top ten of 58.04%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 43 positions in CIBR's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: CIBR.csv.gz.

Share of CIBR's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of CIBR's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.09 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: CIBR.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $209m was out to 10 borrowers, 1.51% of net assets. The largest, GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., held 58.2% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 1.59% of net assets, 105.1% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter CIBR has filed, with each borrower: CIBR.json · all funds.

43 positions became 43: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 8.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of CIBR compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

98.4% of CIBR is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of CIBR (21.2). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• CIBR vs BUG vs HACK: Cybersecurity ETFs — Where the Holdings and Fees Diverge

  All three funds sell the same story — pure-play cybersecurity exposure — but their five-year realized returns span a wide range (7.2% to 14.7% CAGR), and...

  09 Aug 2026 9 min ETF Analysis