VAW holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

VAW's largest investment is Linde PLC at 14.92% of net assets. Newmont Corp and Freeport-mcmoran follow; the three together are 28.67%. Ten companies are 55.5% of the fund; the other 101 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, VAW behaves like 21.2 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.0 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings VAW has held roughly steady since 2019-11-30 (25.9 then, 21.2 now). Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 0 positions were added and 2 dropped; 6.0% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, VAW went from behaving like 25.9 equally weighted positions to 21.2 — 18% fewer, while its top ten went from 50.84% to 55.5% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 111 positions in VAW's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: VAW.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of VAW's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.06 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: VAW.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $24m was out to 8 borrowers, 0.52% of net assets. The largest, BofA Securities, Inc., held 53.5% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.57% of net assets, 109.6% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter VAW has filed, with each borrower: VAW.json · all funds.

113 positions became 111: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 2 dropped (0.4% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 6.0%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of VAW compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Gone: Sealed Air Corp (0.38%), Eightco Holdings Inc (0.01%).

99.40% equity, 0.60% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $4.52B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OBFR01 + 0% on $8M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of VAW (21.2). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.